Ramucirumab

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Cyramza)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Ramucirumab
Monoclonal antibody
TypeWhole antibody
SourceHuman
TargetVEGFR2 (KDR)
Clinical data
Trade namesCyramza
Other namesLY3009806, IMC-1121B
AHFS/Drugs.comMonograph
MedlinePlusa614026
License data
Routes of
administration
Intravenous infusion
Drug classAntineoplastic agents
ATC code
Legal status
Legal status
Identifiers
CAS Number
DrugBank
ChemSpider
  • none
UNII
E number{{#property:P628}}
CompTox Dashboard (EPA)
  • {{#property:P3117}}Lua error in Module:EditAtWikidata at line 29: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
ECHA InfoCard{{#property:P2566}}Lua error in Module:EditAtWikidata at line 29: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
Chemical and physical data
FormulaC6374H9864N1692O1996S46
Molar mass143609.63 g·mol−1
 ☒NcheckY (what is this?)  (verify)

Ramucirumab([5]), sold under the brand name Cyramza, is a fully human monoclonal antibody (IgG1) used for the treatment of cancer.[3][4] Ramucirumab is a human vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2) antagonist.[3][4] Ramucirumab was developed by ImClone Systems.[not verified in body]

Medical uses

[edit | edit source]

Ramucirumab is indicated for the treatment of gastric cancer, colorectal cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, and hepatocellular carcinoma.[3][4]

Contraindications

[edit | edit source]

Under the European Union approval, NSCLC therapy with ramucirumab is contraindicated when there is tumor cavitation, or if major vessels are involved.[6][7]

Side effects

[edit | edit source]

The most common adverse effects in a study investigating ramucirumab monotherapy were diarrhea (14% of patients, as compared to 9% under placebo), hyponatraemia (low blood sodium levels; 6% versus 2%), headache (9% versus 3%), and high blood pressure (16% versus 8%).[3][4]

Pharmacology

[edit | edit source]

Mechanism of action

[edit | edit source]

Ramucirumab is a direct VEGFR2 antagonist, that binds with high affinity to the extracellular domain of VEGFR2 and block the binding of natural VEGFR ligands (VEGF-A, VEGF-C and VEGF-D). These ligands are secreted by solid tumors to promote angiogenesis (formation of new blood vessels from pre-existing ones) and enhance tumor blood supply. Binding of ramucirumab to VEGFR2 leads to inhibition of VEGF-mediated tumor angiogenesis.[3]

History

[edit | edit source]

In April 2014, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved ramucirumab as a single-agent treatment for advanced gastric cancer or gastro-esophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma after prior treatment with fluoropyrimidine- or platinum-containing chemotherapy. The approval was based on the results of the REGARD trial, a phase III, international, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, that evaluated the safety and efficacy of ramucirumab combinated with best supportive care versus placebo.[8] This trial has been criticised for its use of a placebo control arm, which does not reflect standard of care in most Western countries.[9]

Ramucirumab has also been studied in combination with paclitaxel (a type of chemotherapy) and received additional FDA approval on 5 November 2014 as a treatment for people with advanced gastric cancer or GEJ adenocarcinoma after prior treatment with fluoropyrimidine- or platinum-based chemotherapy. The approval was based on the results of the RAINBOW trial, that compared ramucirumab plus paclitaxel or paclitaxel alone.[10]

In December 2014, the FDA approved ramucirumab in combination with docetaxel for treatment of metastatic non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) with disease progression during or after first-line platinum-containing chemotherapy. The approval was based on REVEL trial.[11]

In April 2015, ramucirumab was approved by FDA for the treatment of people with metastatic colorectal cancer with disease progression on or after prior therapy with bevacizumab, oxaliplatin, and fluoropyrimidine. The approval was based on the results of the RAISE trial, a phase III study, which compared ramucirumab plus irinotecan, folinic acid, and 5-fluorouracil (FOLFIRI) to FOLFIRI alone.[12]

In May 2019, ramucirumab was approved by FDA as a single agent treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in people who have an alpha fetoprotein (AFP) of > 400 ng/mL and have been previously treated with sorafenib.[13] The approval was based on REACH-2 (NCT02435433), a multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study in participants with advanced HCC with AFP > 400 ng/mL who had disease progression on or after sorafenib or who were intolerant. The estimated median overall survival (OS) was 8.5 months (7.0-10.6 months) for participants receiving ramucirumab and 7.3 months (5.4-9.1 months) for those receiving placebo.

Clinical trials

[edit | edit source]

In September 2013, the manufacturer Eli Lilly announced that its phase III study for ramucirumab failed to hit its primary endpoint on progression-free survival among women with metastatic breast cancer.[14][15]

In June 2014, a phase III trial of the drug reported it failed to improve overall survival in liver cancer.[16]

In February 2016, it was reported that a phase II trial of adding ramucirumab to docetaxel improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared with docetaxel alone in locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma.[17] It is being studied in the RANGE phase III trial for this indication.[18]

Between 2016 and 2018, 26 hospitals in Italy conducted a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II trial to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the anti-VEGFR-2 antibody ramucirumab combined with gemcitabine in participants with pretreated  pleural mesothelioma. Combining ramucirumab to standard second line gemcitabine significantly improved overall survival after failure of first-line chemotherapy, with a favorable safety profile.[19]

References

[edit | edit source]
  1. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  2. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  3. ^ a b c d e f Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  4. ^ a b c d e Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  5. ^ Statement On A Nonproprietary Name Adopted By The USAN Council - Ramucirumab, American Medical Association
  6. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  7. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  8. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  9. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  10. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  11. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  12. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  13. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  14. ^ Clinical trial number NCT00703326 for "Phase III Study of Docetaxel + Ramucirumab or Placebo in Breast Cancer" at ClinicalTrials.gov
  15. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  16. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  17. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  18. ^ Clinical trial number NCT02426125 for "A Study of Ramucirumab (LY3009806) Plus Docetaxel in Participants With Urothelial Cancer (RANGE)" at ClinicalTrials.gov
  19. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).

Lua error in mw.title.lua at line 392: bad argument #2 to 'title.new' (unrecognized namespace name 'Portal'). Lua error in Module:Authority_control at line 153: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).