Poleta Formation

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Poleta Formation
Stratigraphic range: Cambrian Series 2
~519–518 Ma
The Poleta Folds area, the locality after which the formation is named.
TypeFormation
Sub-unitsSee: Members
UnderliesHarkless Formation
OverliesCampito Formation
Thickness0–1,900 ft (0–579 m)[1]
Lithology
PrimaryFine siliciclastics
OtherLimestone, Quartzite, Siltstone
Location
RegionCalifornia, Nevada
CountryUnited States
Type section
Named forPoleta Folds

The Poleta Formation is a geological unit known for the exceptional fossil preservation in the Indian Springs Lagerstätte, located in eastern California and Nevada.[2]

Occurrence

[edit | edit source]

The formation dates to the Stage 3 of the yet-to-be-ratified Cambrian Series 2; the lower portion base of the formation and the youngest Lagerstätte beds date to the Nevadella trilobite zone (= Laurentian Montezuman stage), with higher beds dating to the Olenellus trilobite zone (= Laurentian Dyeran stage), making the formation the same age as the Sirius Passet and just younger than the Chengjiang.[2] It outcrops in Esmeralda County in western Nevada.[2]

Geology

[edit | edit source]

The Poleta Formation is mainly composed of limestone rocks within its lower and upper sections, with its middle section containing siltstone, quartzite, and some limestone.[1]

Members

[edit | edit source]

The formation contains three members, which are as follows, in ascending age:

  • Lower Member: This member is the thickest of the three, getting up to 1,000 ft (300 m) thick. It is primarily composed of medium to light-gray oolitic limestone, containing an abundance of archeocyathid reefs.[3] The limestone mostly well-bedded, although it is occasionally thin to very thin-bedded. There is also a single inter-stratified layer of greenish-gray or olive-gray siltstone, getting up to 100 ft (30 m) thick.[1]
  • Middle Member: This member in some areas gets up to 600 ft (180 m) thick. It is dominated by siltstones, limestones, and sandstones or quartzites. The siltstone layers are made up of grayish-olive, pale-olive, and locally pale-yellowish-brown or light-brown siltstone, shale, and phylitic silstone, which are composed of subangular silt-sized grains of quartz, embedded in a fine-textured matrix of muscovite or mica clay, and chlorite. The limestone layers are composed of medium-gray to grayish-orange or mottled-gray to light-brown aphanitic to medium crystalline limestone, which is inter-stratified with occasional siltstone. The sandstone or quartzite layers are primarily pale-brown, light-brown and very-pale-orange, very fine to fine grained and commonly evenly laminated. In some areas, these layers can grade into a coarse siltstone. They also contain quartz and feldspars.[1]
  • Upper Member: This member is the thinnest, only getting up to 100 ft (30 m) thick. It is mostly composed of medium-gray limestone, which is very thin to thin-bedded. It also contains a few archaeocyathid fossils.[1]

Depositional setting

[edit | edit source]

The formation was deposited on an offshore shelf between the wave base and storm base, and experienced storm-related pulses of siliciclastic sediment input. Like many other Burgess Shale-type Lagerstätten, this unit was deposited on the Cordilleran margin of the Laurentian continent; it is among the oldest of the Lagerstätten from this region.[2]

Taphonomy

[edit | edit source]

The modes of preservation of the non-biomineralised material found within the Indian Springs Lagerstätte has been noted to be either clay-mineral replacement, and pyrite or iron oxide staining. This is similar to the modes of preservation seen in the Chengjiang Lagerstätte. The Lagerstätte is also an example of a obrution-type deposition, which is a rapid burial of organisms, with some helicoplacoids being buried alive, still in their upright position. This form of deposition will have also obscured the buried specimens from scavengers.[2]

Paleobiota

[edit | edit source]
File:Archeocyathids.JPG
Archeocyathids from the Death Valley area

Most of the fauna is biomineralized, including brachiopods, hyolithids, trilobites,[4] archeocyathids from the Gold Point Reef locality,[5][3] and helicoplacoids, which are often articulated.[2] Non-mineralized components of these fossils are also preserved, as are sponges, anomalocaridid parts, and a range of algae and cyanobacteria.[2]

Trace fossils, mainly Planolites, are also common; ichnofossils generally lie on the bedding plane and very few penetrate more than 1 millimetre (0.039 in) into the sediment. The biota of this formation has been noted to be similar to the Utah Lagerstätten, more so to the Spence Shale.[2]

Color key
Taxon Reclassified taxon Taxon falsely reported as present Dubious taxon or junior synonym Ichnotaxon Ootaxon Morphotaxon
Notes
Uncertain or tentative taxa are in small text; crossed out taxa are discredited.

Arthropoda

[edit | edit source]
Genus Species Notes Images
Mesonacis
  • M. fremonti
Olenellid trilobite, originally described as Fremonita.[6]
File:Mesonacis NMNH.jpg
Laudonia[1][6]
  • Laudonia sp.
Olenellid trilobite.
Olenellus[6]
  • O. clarki
Olenellid trilobite.
File:Olenellus clarki 37mm CRF.jpeg
Elliptocephala[7]
  • E. praenuntius
Olenellid trilobite.
Teresellus[7]
  • Teresellus sp.
  • T. goldfieldensis
Olenellid rilobite.
Nevadella[1][6][2]
  • N. eucharis
Nevadid trilobite.
File:Nevadella eucharis USNM PAL 60079.jpg
Nevadia[2]
  • N. parvoconica
Nevadid trilobite.
File:NevadiaSp.jpg
Judomia (?)[1]
  • Judomia (?) sp.
Nevadid trilobite.
Holmiella[4]
  • H. falx
Holmiid trilobite.
Holmia[1]
  • Holmia sp.
Holmiid trilobite.
Palmettaspis[4]
  • P. consorta
  • P. lidensis
Holmiid trilobite.
Grandinasus[4]
  • Grandinasus sp.
  • G. argentus
  • G. auricampus
Holmiid trilobite.
Holmidd (?)[4]
  • ???
Undetermined holmiid trilobite.
Keeleaspis (?)[7]
  • K. (?) terhaari
Corynexochid trilobite.
Polliaxis[7]
  • P. hanseni
Corynexochid trilobite.
Geraldinella[2]
  • Geraldinella sp.
Fallotaspidoid trilobite.
Anomalocarididae[2]
  • ???
Anomalocaridid sclerites and fragments.

Lophotrochozoa

[edit | edit source]
Genus Species Notes Images
Microcornus[8]
  • Microcornus sp.
Lophotrochozoan hyolith.
Hyolithellus (?)[8]
  • Hyolithellus (?) sp.
Lophotrochozoan hyolith.
Obolella[9]
  • Obolellasp.
Obelellid brachiopod.
File:Obolella crassa.png
Kutorgina[9]
  • K. perugata
Kutorginid brachiopod.
File:Kutorgina cingulata.png
Lingulella[9]
  • Lingulella spp.
Obolid brachiopod.
File:Lingulella sp. NIGP 176327.png
Spinulothele[9]
  • S. dubia
Acrotheloid brachiopod.
Pompeckium (?)[9]
  • P. argenteum (?)
Eoorthid brachiopod.
Mickwitzia[2]
  • M. occidens
Mickwitziid brachiopod.
Swantonia[9]
  • S. weeksi
Brachiopod of uncertain affinities.
Lingulid[2]
  • ???
Lingulid brachiopod.
Obollelid[2]
  • ???
Obollelid brachiopod, muscle scars preserved.
Hyolithes[6]
  • H. princeps
Lophotrochozoan hyolith.
Hyolithellus[3]
  • Hyolithellus (?) sp.
  • H. insolitus
Lophotrochozoan hyolith.
Hyolithid[2]
  • ???
Lophotrochozoan hyolithids, too poorly preserved for taxonomic placement.
Orthothecida[10]
  • ???
Orthothecid hyoliths, too poorly preserved for taxonomic placement.
Lapworthella (?)[11]
  • Lapworthella (?) sp.
Lophotrochozoan tommotid.

Chancelloriidae

[edit | edit source]
Genus Species Notes Images
Allonia[8]
  • Allonia sp.
Chancelloriid organism.
Chancelloria[8]
  • Chancelloria sp.
Chancelloriid organism.
Chancelloriid[2]
  • ???
Chancelloriid spicules.

Cnidaria

[edit | edit source]
Genus Species Notes Images
Paiutitubulites[12]
  • P. variabilis
  • P. durhami
Anthozoan cnidarian.
Cambrotubulites[12]
  • Cambrotubulites sp.
  • C. trisepta
Anthozoan cnidarian.
Sphenothallus[3]
  • Sphenothallus sp.
Cnidarian conulariid.
Genus A[12]
  • Genus A sp.
Anthozoan cnidarian, similar interior to Cambrotubulites and Paiutitubulites, though differs in having five septa.

Porifera (Sponges)

[edit | edit source]
Genus Species Notes Images
Archaeocyathus[3]
  • A. arborensis
Archeocyathid sponge.
Claruscoscinus[3]
  • Claruscoscinus sp.
Archeocyathid sponge.
Protopharetra[3]
  • P. junensis
Archeocyathid sponge.
Gatagacyathus[3]
  • Gatagacyathus sp.
Archeocyathid sponge.
Ethmophyllum[3]
  • E. whitneyi
Archeocyathid sponge.
File:Ethmophyllum whitneyi.png
Williamicyathus[3]
  • W. colvillensis
Archeocyathid sponge.
Robustocyathellus[3]
  • Robustocyathellus sp.
Archeocyathid sponge.
Paranacyathus[13]
  • Paranacyathus sp.
Archeocyathid sponge.
Protopharetra[13]
  • Protopharetra sp.
Archeocyathid sponge.
Metacyathellus (?)[3]
  • Metacyathellus (?) sp.
Archeocyathid sponge.
Cordilleracyathus (?)[3]
  • Cordilleracyathus (?) sp.
Archeocyathid sponge.
Wapkia (?)[2]
  • Wapkia (?) sp.
Wapkiid demosponge.

Echniodermata

[edit | edit source]
Genus Species Notes Images
Helicoplacus[1][6][14][2]
  • Helicoplacus sp.
  • H. gilberti
Oblong echinoderm.
File:Helicoplacus USNM.jpg
Eocystites[14]
  • Eocystites sp.
Echinoderm.

Foraminifera

[edit | edit source]
Genus Species Notes Images
Platysolenites[15]
  • P. antiquissimus
Agglutinated hyperamminid foraminiferan.
File:Estonian Museum of Natural History Specimen No 171849 photo (g1 g1-551 1 jpg).jpg
Problematicum A[15]
  • ???
Platysolenites-like tubular test, may be a taphonomic variant of Platysolenites. Also shows a resemblance to Spirosolenites spiralis, Although it differs to much in other ways when compared to Platysolenites and Spirosolenites.

Petalonamae

[edit | edit source]
Genus Species Notes Images
Swartpuntia[16]
  • Swartpuntia sp.
Sessile frondose organism, although assignment has been questioned based on the possibility that known specimens could be referred to other known Cambrian frondose organisms.[17]
File:Swartpuntiagermsi.png

incertae sedis

[edit | edit source]
Genus Species Notes Images
Onuphionella[18]
  • O. claytonensis
Tubular fossil.
Salterella[19]
  • Salterella sp.
Tubular salterellid fossil.
Westgardia[20]
  • W. gigantea
Valve-shaped fossil. Noted to be a mold of the shell, and poor preservation hinders taxonomic placement, although general morphology suggests it to be a mollusc.

Flora

[edit | edit source]
Genus Species Notes Images
Cyanobacteria (?)[7]
  • ???
Calcareous cyanobacteria.
Renalcis[13]
  • Renalcis sp.
Cyanophyte cyanobacteria.

Ichnogenera

[edit | edit source]
Genus Species Notes Images
Cruziana[14]
  • Cruziana sp.
Trails.
File:Cruziana2.jpg
Planolites[14][2]
  • Planolites sp.
Burrows.
File:Planolites.jpg
Scolicia[14]
  • Scolicia sp.
Burrows.
File:Ichnofossils - Scolicia strozzii.JPG
Rusophycus[14]
  • Rusophycus sp.
Resting trace of trilobites.
File:RusophycusOrdovician.jpg
Bergaueria[14]
  • Bergaueria sp.
Resting trace of cnidarians.
File:Bergaueria radiata.png
Laevicyclus[14]
  • Laevicyclus sp.
Traces.
Psammichnites (?)[14]
  • Psammichnites (?) sp.
Burrows.
Monocraterion[14]
  • Monocraterion sp.
Burrows.
Skolithos[1][14]
  • Skolithos sp.
Burrows.
File:Skolithos.jpg

See also

[edit | edit source]

Lua error in mw.title.lua at line 392: bad argument #2 to 'title.new' (unrecognized namespace name 'Portal').

References

[edit | edit source]
  1. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  2. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  3. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  4. ^ a b c d e Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  5. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  6. ^ a b c d e f Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  7. ^ a b c d e Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  8. ^ a b c d Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  9. ^ a b c d e f Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  10. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  11. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  12. ^ a b c Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  13. ^ a b c Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  14. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  15. ^ a b Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  16. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  17. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  18. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  19. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  20. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).