MyWiki:WikiProject Motorsport/Formula E
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Motorsport/Navigation}} The Formula E Taskforce has been created to make a better, co-ordinated effort towards Formula E related articles.
Participants
[edit source]- Holdenman05 (talk · contribs)
- ZappaOMati (talk · contribs)
- Speedy Question Mark (talk · contribs)
- DH85868993 (talk · contribs)
- JohnMcButts (talk · contribs)
- FamilycomputerFTW (talk · contribs)
- MWright96 (talk · contribs)
- StuffAndMore (talk · contribs)
- TJSRX (talk · contribs)
- Pokerplayer513 (talk · contribs)
- SSSB (talk · contribs)
- AMitzikarlA•Let's talk•
- TartarTorte (talk · contribs)
- MaxLikesStuff (talk · contribs)
- Fakhruddin Hawari (talk · contribs)
- MB2437
- Shadow614 (talk · contribs)
Userbox
[edit source]Placing this code on your userpage:
- {{User WP Formula E}}
will produce this userbox:
FE This user is a member of the Formula E taskforce.
Articles
[edit source]Seasons
[edit source]Templates
[edit source]- Template:Formula E teams
- Template:Formula E race report
- Template:Formula E
- Template:FE ePrix Season 1-10
- Template:FE ePrix Season 11-20
Categories
[edit source]- Category:Formula E
- Category:Formula E seasons
- Category:2014–15 Formula E season
- Category:2015–16 Formula E season
- Category:2016–17 Formula E season
- Category:2017–18 Formula E season
- Category:2018–19 Formula E season
- Category:2019–20 Formula E season
- Category:2020–21 Formula E season
- Category:2021–22 Formula E season
- Category:2022–23 Formula E season
- Category:2023–24 Formula E season
- Category:2024–25 Formula E season
- Category:Formula E teams
- Category:Formula E drivers
- Category:Formula E team owners
- Category:Formula E team templates
Race abbreviations
[edit source]The Formula E taskforce uses the official Formula E race abbreviations, as documented below. Note that these may differ from the abbreviations used by other WikiProjects/task forces, e.g. WikiProject Formula One uses "MON" for the Formula One Monaco Grand Prix.
| Abbrev | Race (Venue) |
|---|---|
| ADR | Ad Diriyah ePrix |
| BEI | Beijing ePrix |
| BER | Berlin ePrix (Tempelhof) |
| Berlin ePrix (Karl-Marx-Allee) | |
| BRN | Swiss ePrix (Bern Street Circuit) |
| BUE | Buenos Aires ePrix |
| CPT | Cape Town ePrix |
| DIR | Diriyah ePrix[a] |
| DRH | |
| HKG | Hong Kong ePrix |
| HYD | Hyderabad ePrix |
| ITA | Misano ePrix |
| JAK | Jakarta ePrix[b] |
| JKT | |
| JED | Jeddah ePrix |
| LBH | Long Beach ePrix |
| LDN | London ePrix (Battersea Park) |
| London ePrix (ExCeL) | |
| MCO | Monaco ePrix |
| MEX | Mexico City ePrix |
| MIA | Miami ePrix |
| MRK | Marrakesh ePrix |
| MSC | Moscow ePrix |
| MTL | Montreal ePrix |
| NYC | New York City ePrix |
| PAR | Paris ePrix |
| PDE | Punta del Este ePrix |
| POR | Portland ePrix |
| PUE | Puebla ePrix |
| PUT | Putrajaya ePrix |
| RME | Rome ePrix |
| SAO | São Paulo ePrix |
| SCL | Santiago ePrix (Parque Forestal) |
| Santiago ePrix (Parque O'Higgins) | |
| SEO | Seoul ePrix |
| SHA | Shanghai ePrix |
| SYX | Sanya ePrix |
| TKO | Tokyo ePrix |
| VNC | Vancouver ePrix |
| VLC | Valencia ePrix |
| ZUR | Zürich ePrix |
| Source (2022–23) | |
| Past seasons: | 2021–22 2020–21 2019–20 2018–19 2017–18 |
- ^ "DRH" replaced "DIR" since the 2022 Diriyah ePrix.
- ^ "JKT" was used for the 2023 Jakarta ePrix.
Legend:
Denotes an event that is part of the 2022–23 calendar.
Denotes an event that is not part of the current calendar.
Denotes user-created abbreviations for races held exlusively prior to the 2017–18 season.
Denotes official abbreviations for races that didn't take place and also provisional (user-created) abbreviations when official abbreviation is unknown.
Denotes official abbreviations not in use as they were replaced by new ones.
Further notes:
- Formula E were not using any official abbreviations before the 2017–18 season. In order to keep continuity, the official abbreviation should replace the user-created abbreviation (if different) for prior races, if it's the same event (i.e. the same ePrix name).
- The official abbrevations are taken from the official Formula E documents listed on the results page or the notice board. The entire point is to unify Wikipedia articles with the actual abbreviations as Formula E happens to use the abbreviation system itself.
- All official abbrevations for the given season should always be respected, even if they differ in comparison with previous seasons. Only user-created abbreviations should be replaced retroactively with the official ones.
Featured content
[edit source]Featured Articles
[edit source]Former featured articles
[edit source]Featured Lists
[edit source]Featured Candidates
[edit source]Good Articles
[edit source]- 2015 Berlin ePrix

- 2016–17 Formula E Championship

- 2016 Long Beach ePrix

- 2016 Paris ePrix

- 2016 Berlin ePrix

- 2016 Hong Kong ePrix

- 2016 Marrakesh ePrix

- 2017 Buenos Aires ePrix

- 2017 Mexico City ePrix

- 2017 Monaco ePrix

- 2017 Paris ePrix

- 2017 Berlin ePrix

- 2017 New York ePrix

- 2017 Montreal ePrix

- 2017 Hong Kong ePrix

- 2018 Marrakesh ePrix

- 2018 Santiago ePrix

- 2018 Punta del Este ePrix

- 2018 Rome ePrix

- 2018 Paris ePrix

- 2018 Berlin ePrix

- 2018 Zürich ePrix

- 2018 New York City ePrix

Good Article Candidates
[edit source]Did you know?
[edit source]Article assessment
[edit source]Quality scale
[edit source]Note: A B-class article should have at least one reference.
| Class | Criteria | Reader's experience | Editing suggestions | Example |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The article has attained featured article status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured article candidates. More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured article criteria:{{Wikipedia:Featured article criteria}}
|
Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. | Cleopatra (as of June 2018) |
|
| The article has attained featured list status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured list candidates. More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured list criteria:{{Wikipedia:Featured list criteria}}
|
Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. | List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events (as of May 2018) |
|
| The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class. More detailed criteria
The article meets the A-Class criteria:
{{Wikipedia:Content assessment/A-Class criteria|raw=yes}} |
Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting. | Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. WP:Peer review may help. | Battle of Nam River (as of June 2014) |
|
| The article meets all of the good article criteria, and has been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from WP:Good article nominations. More detailed criteria
{{Wikipedia:Good article criteria}}
|
Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (though not necessarily equalling) the quality of a professional publication. | Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing. | Everybody Wants to Rule the World (as of October 2025) |
|
| B | The article meets all of the B-Class criteria. It is mostly complete and does not have major problems, but requires some further work to reach good article standards. More detailed criteria
{{Wikipedia:Content assessment/B-Class criteria|raw=yes}}
|
Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher. | A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines. | Psychology (as of January 2024) |
| C | The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup. More detailed criteria
The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements, or need editing for clarity, balance, or flow.
|
Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study. | Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems. | Wing (as of June 2018) |
| Start | An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources. More detailed criteria
The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas. The article has one or more of the following:
|
Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more. | Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Improve the grammar, spelling, and writing style; decrease the use of jargon. | Gravel (as of January 2006) |
| Stub | A very basic description of the topic. Meets none of the Start-Class criteria. | Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant. | Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant. | Lineage (anthropology) (as of December 2014) |
| List | Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list or set index article, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area. | There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader. | Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized. | List of literary movements |