MyWiki:WikiProject Geology/Periods
Template:WP:WikiProject Geology/Navbox4 The Geological periods task force is a group of editors aiming to improve Wikipedia's articles about the geological periods, as part of WikiProject Geology, WikiProject Dinosaurs and WikiProject Palaeontology.
With articles on the periods receiving around a thousand hits a day, they are some of the most visited geology articles, but many are in need of attention and expansion!
Goals
[edit source]To bring each of Wikipedia's articles on geological periods to a common standard, comprehensively covering all major aspects of the period.
Each article should begin to address the contemporary geography, geology, climate, and geochemistry, as well as detailing life at the time - the marine (including reefs) and terrestrial fauna and flora. It should also provide an outline of any significant events (for example the PETM or Cambrian explosion) and document any historical significance attached to the period.
Collaboration of the month
[edit source]This month's period for improvement is the Triassic. Please help expand this article in any way you can!
Worklist
[edit source]Please find any cell that interests you and try to bring it up a grade. We're aiming for an "A" in every box! (For a good example of what's expected in most categories, see Paleocene).
| Period | Article structure | History | Geography | Geology | Climate | Events | Palaeontology | Geochemistry | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | B | C | C | C | Stub | Start | Needed | For the History section to be A-tier, a blurb about the abolition and subsequent readoption of the period by the ICS needs to be added. Additionally, the section needs to be restructured, as there are too many short paragraphs and some of them can be grouped together. | |
| C | C | Start | C | Start | Stub | C | Needed | Include some more info in a history section and that section will be well on its way to becoming A-tier. The rest of this article needs some heavier-duty improvements. | |
| B | Start | File:Symbol a class.svg A | C | B | C | C | Needed | The Climate section need of a supplementary image or photograph for it to be an A-tier section. | |
| B | C | C | B | B | B | B | Stub | For the Climate section to be A-tier, it could use an additional image or chart to balance out the dense comprehension. | |
| B | B | B | File:Symbol a class.svg A | C | B | File:Symbol a class.svg A | Stub | History could be an "A", but needs to be expanded to include the period's addition/inclusion in the ICS timescale. Also the end-Jurassic extinction events should probably be discussed a bit more - perhaps in a paragraph or two. Climate should also be expanded to include an overview of the general climatic conditions in the Jurassic. Otherwise, this is one of the best articles seen so far! | |
| B | Stub | File:Symbol a class.svg A | C | C | File:Symbol a class.svg A | B | Needed | Only issue with the paleontology section is that it needs a bit more info about the plants (if possible). Structure is almost an "A" as well, just needs a bit of reorganization with the geology-related stuff. | |
| B | C | C | C | B | B | B | Needed | ||
| B | File:Symbol a class.svg A | File:Symbol a class.svg A | File:Symbol a class.svg A | File:Symbol a class.svg A | File:Symbol a class.svg A | B | File:Symbol a class.svg A | ||
| B | B | File:Symbol a class.svg A | Start | C | B | File:Symbol a class.svg A | Needed | History could be an "A", but needs to be expanded for reasons listed in "Jurassic" | |
| B | B | C | Start | C | Stub | B | Needed | History could be "A", but needs needs to be expanded for reasons listed in "Jurassic" | |
| B | C | B | C | C | B | B | Stub | ||
| B | File:Symbol a class.svg A | File:Symbol a class.svg A | File:Symbol a class.svg A | File:Symbol a class.svg A | B | B | File:Symbol a class.svg A | ||
| B | C | Stub | Needed | Stub | C | B | Start | Geography and Geology are barely mentioned in the article, if not completely absent. | |
| C | C | Start | Stub | C | C | C | Needed | ||
| Stub | Needed | Stub | Needed | Needed | Stub | Start | Needed | All periods from the Rhyacian to the Tonian are considered stubs and require drastic improvements. | |
| Stub | Stub | Stub | Stub | Needed | Stub | Stub | Needed | ||
| Stub | Needed | Stub | Needed | Needed | Stub | Start | Needed | ||
| Stub | Needed | Stub | Needed | Needed | Stub | Stub | Needed | ||
| Stub | Needed | Stub | Stub | Stub | Stub | Stub | Needed | ||
| Stub | Stub | Stub | Stub | Needed | Stub | Needed | Needed | ||
| Start | Start | Needed | Stub | Needed | Stub | Stub | Needed | ||
| C | Start | B | Start | B | C | Start | Start | Geology is mentioned in the article, but mostly in the Paleontology section, as this period lacks subdivisions to expand on. For Geology to at least reach B-tier, there should be dedicated paragraphs for the depositional sites correlating to this timeframe from all respective locations in the world (it includes one for Australia, but is missing info from North America, South Africa, Northwestern Europe, and China). |
You can help by assessing articles in each of the areas listed above. The grading scale is as follows:
| File:Symbol a class.svg A | Well written, comprehensive and fully sourced report of all aspects of the subject. May form a separate article (e.g. "Ediacaran biota"), which the main article summarises. |
| B | Reasonably comprehensive but room for improvement. |
| C | Makes a good stab at addressing the issue; all the major components are at least noted, but significant expansion is necessary. |
| Start | A good start: at least a paragraph addressing the topic. |
| Stub | Topic is only briefly mentioned somewhere in the article. |
We're also looking to create a uniform look and feel to all articles about geological time periods. To this end we're working on the infobox template listed below. If you can think of any way to improve this box, please speak up!
Participation
[edit source]Everybody is encouraged to help out with the tasks listed above, as they wish! You may also wish to add this page to your watchlist to keep an eye on developments.
Anyone wishing to formally indicate their membership of the project is encouraged to add their signature to the list below:
- Enlil Ninlil (talk) 10:46, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
- Smith609 Talk 15:45, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
- Woudloper (talk) 11:55, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
- Hza a 9 (talk) 17:25, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
- Benniboi01 (talk) 21:41, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
- Jarred C Lloyd (talk) 02:18, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
- Hemiauchenia (talk) 00:14, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
- JavaRogers (talk) 22:59, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
- Dudley Miles (talk) 10:27, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
- Anteosaurus magnificus (talk) 05:11, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
- Fanboyphilosopher (talk) 15:39, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
- Silica Cat (talk) 16:37, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- Alex26337 (talk) 12:38, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
Project banner
[edit source]Place {{WikiProject Geology|class=|importance=|Geological periods=|Geological periods-importance=}} onto any new article's talk page for it to be recognised and assessed under the scope of this task force. An article's assessment is generated from the class and importance parameters and helps organise relevant articles for improvement. When assessed, the class and importance parameters are filled in, like this:
{{WikiProject Geology|class=Start|importance=Mid|Geological periods=yes|Geological periods-importance=High}}
and the banner looks like this:
| WikiProject icon | Geology: Periods Mid‑importance | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
Shortcuts: {{WikiProject Geology}}, {{WPGEOLOGY}}, {{WPGeology}}, {{WP Geology}}
The article is classified in the appropriate subcategories of Category:Geological periods articles. For more information visit the WikiProject Geology assessment page: Wikipedia:WikiProject Geology/Assessment