Zero-divisor graph

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The zero-divisor graph of 2×4, the only possible zero-divisor graph that is a tree but not a star

In mathematics, and more specifically in combinatorial commutative algebra, a zero-divisor graph is an undirected graph representing the zero divisors of a commutative ring. It has elements of the ring as its vertices, and pairs of elements whose product is zero as its edges.[1]

Definition

[edit | edit source]

There are two variations of the zero-divisor graph commonly used. In the original definition of Beck (1988), the vertices represent all elements of the ring.[2] In a later variant studied by Anderson & Livingston (1999), the vertices represent only the zero divisors of the given ring.[3]

Examples

[edit | edit source]

If n is a semiprime number (the product of two prime numbers) then the zero-divisor graph of the ring of integers modulo n (with only the zero divisors as its vertices) is either a complete graph or a complete bipartite graph. It is a complete graph Kp1 in the case that n=p2 for some prime number p. In this case the vertices are all the nonzero multiples of p, and the product of any two of these numbers is zero modulo p2.[3]

It is a complete bipartite graph Kp1,q1 in the case that n=pq for two distinct prime numbers p and q. The two sides of the bipartition are the p1 nonzero multiples of q and the q1 nonzero multiples of p, respectively. Two numbers (that are not themselves zero modulo n) multiply to zero modulo n if and only if one is a multiple of p and the other is a multiple of q, so this graph has an edge between each pair of vertices on opposite sides of the bipartition, and no other edges. More generally, the zero-divisor graph is a complete bipartite graph for any ring that is a product of two integral domains.[3]

The only cycle graphs that can be realized as zero-product graphs (with zero divisors as vertices) are the cycles of length 3 or 4.[3] The only trees that may be realized as zero-divisor graphs are the stars (complete bipartite graphs that are trees) and the five-vertex tree formed as the zero-divisor graph of 2×4.[1][3]

Properties

[edit | edit source]

In the version of the graph that includes all elements, 0 is a universal vertex, and the zero divisors can be identified as the vertices that have a neighbor other than 0. Because it has a universal vertex, the graph of all ring elements is always connected and has diameter at most two. The graph of all zero divisors is non-empty for every ring that is not an integral domain. It remains connected, has diameter at most three,[3] and (if it contains a cycle) has girth at most four.[4][5]

The zero-divisor graph of a ring that is not an integral domain is finite if and only if the ring is finite.[3] More concretely, if the graph has maximum degree d, the ring has at most (d22d+2)2 elements. If the ring and the graph are infinite, every edge has an endpoint with infinitely many neighbors.[1]

Beck (1988) conjectured that (like the perfect graphs) zero-divisor graphs always have equal clique number and chromatic number. However, this is not true; a counterexample was discovered by Anderson & Naseer (1993).[6]

References

[edit | edit source]
  1. ^ a b c Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  2. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  3. ^ a b c d e f g Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  4. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  5. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  6. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).