Template:Sum RFC/testcases

This is the template test cases page for the sandbox of Template:Sum RFC. Purge this page to update the examples.
If there are many examples of a complicated template, later ones may break due to limits in MediaWiki; see the HTML comment "NewPP limit report" in the rendered page.
You can also use Special:ExpandTemplates to examine the results of template uses.
You can test how this page looks in the different skins and parsers with these links:

Test0

{{Sum RFC}}

Parameter error in {{Sum RFC}}: Missing RFC.

Test1

{{Sum RFC|10|plain=yes |ref=yes}}

Test2

{{Sum RFC|15|title=no}}

RFC 15

Test3

{{Sum RFC|826}}

RFC 826 – "An Ethernet Address Resolution Protocol," Internet Standard 37.

Test4

{{Sum RFC|903}}

RFC 903 – "A Reverse Address Resolution Protocol," Internet Standard 38.

Test5

{{Sum RFC|879|notes=yes}}

RFC 879 – "The TCP Maximum Segment Size and Related Topics," Obsolete. Obsoleted by RFC 7805 and 9293. Updated by RFC 6691.

Test6

{{Sum RFC|2100|ref=yes}}

RFC 2100 – "The Naming of Hosts,"^[2] Informational.

Test7

{{Sum RFC|2321|ref=yes}}

RFC 2321 – "RITA -- The Reliable Internetwork Troubleshooting Agent,"^[3] Informational.

Test8

{{Sum RFC|2321|ref=yes |refnotes=no}}

RFC 2321 – "RITA -- The Reliable Internetwork Troubleshooting Agent,"^[3] Informational.

References

^ ^a ^b Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value). Status Unknown. Obsoleted by RFC 16. Updated by RFC 24, 27 and 30. Obsoletes RFC 3.
^ ^a ^b Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value). Informational. This is an April Fools' Day Request for Comments.
^ ^a ^b ^c ^d Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value). Informational. This is an April Fools' Day Request for Comments. Cite error: The named reference "rfc2321" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).