Sumner's conjecture

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Unsolved problem in mathematics
Does every (2n2)-vertex tournament contain as a subgraph every n-vertex oriented tree?
File:Polytrees in a tournament.svg
A 6-vertex tournament, and copies of every 4-vertex oriented tree within it.

Sumner's conjecture (also called Sumner's universal tournament conjecture) is a conjecture in extremal graph theory on oriented trees in tournaments. It states that every orientation of every n-vertex tree is a subgraph of every (2n2)-vertex tournament.[1] David Sumner, a graph theorist at the University of South Carolina, conjectured in 1971 that tournaments are universal graphs for polytrees. The conjecture was proven for all large n by Daniela Kühn, Richard Mycroft, and Deryk Osthus.[2]

Examples

[edit | edit source]

Let polytree P be a star K1,n1, in which all edges are oriented outward from the central vertex to the leaves. Then, P cannot be embedded in the tournament formed from the vertices of a regular 2n3-gon by directing every edge clockwise around the polygon. For, in this tournament, every vertex has indegree and outdegree equal to n2, while the central vertex in P has larger outdegree n1.[3] Thus, if true, Sumner's conjecture would give the best possible size of a universal graph for polytrees.

However, in every tournament of 2n2 vertices, the average outdegree is n32, and the maximum outdegree is an integer greater than or equal to the average. Therefore, there exists a vertex of outdegree n32=n1, which can be used as the central vertex for a copy of P.

Partial results

[edit | edit source]

The following partial results on the conjecture have been proven.

  • There is a function f(n) with asymptotic growth rate f(n)=2n+o(n) with the property that every n-vertex polytree can be embedded as a subgraph of every f(n)-vertex tournament. Additionally and more explicitly, f(n)3n3.[4]
  • There is a function g(k) such that tournaments on n+g(k) vertices are universal for polytrees with k leaves.[5]
  • There is a function h(n,Δ) such that every n-vertex polytree with maximum degree at most Δ forms a subgraph of every tournament with h(n,Δ) vertices. When Δ is a fixed constant, the asymptotic growth rate of h(n,Δ) is n+o(n).[6]
  • Every "near-regular" tournament on 2n2 vertices contains every n-vertex polytree.[7]
  • Every orientation of an n-vertex caterpillar tree with diameter at most four can be embedded as a subgraph of every (2n2)-vertex tournament.[7]
  • Every (2n2)-vertex tournament contains as a subgraph every n-vertex arborescence.[8]
[edit | edit source]

Rosenfeld (1972) conjectured that every orientation of an n-vertex path graph (with n8) can be embedded as a subgraph into every n-vertex tournament.[7] After partial results by Thomason (1986), this was proven by Havet & Thomassé (2000a).

Havet and Thomassé[9] in turn conjectured a strengthening of Sumner's conjecture, that every tournament on n+k1 vertices contains as a subgraph every polytree with at most k leaves. This has been confirmed for almost every tree by Mycroft and Naia (2018).

Burr (1980) conjectured that, whenever a graph G requires 2n2 or more colors in a coloring of G, then every orientation of G contains every orientation of an n-vertex tree. Because complete graphs require a different color for each vertex, Sumner's conjecture would follow immediately from Burr's conjecture.[10] As Burr showed, orientations of graphs whose chromatic number grows quadratically as a function of n are universal for polytrees.

Notes

[edit | edit source]
  1. ^ Kühn, Mycroft & Osthus (2011a). However the earliest published citations given by Kühn et al. are to Reid & Wormald (1983) and Wormald (1983). Wormald (1983) cites the conjecture as an undated private communication by Sumner.
  2. ^ Kühn, Mycroft & Osthus (2011b).
  3. ^ This example is from Kühn, Mycroft & Osthus (2011a).
  4. ^ Kühn, Mycroft & Osthus (2011a) and El Sahili (2004). For earlier weaker bounds on f(n), see Chung (1981), Wormald (1983), Häggkvist & Thomason (1991), Havet & Thomassé (2000b), and Havet (2002).
  5. ^ Häggkvist & Thomason (1991); Havet & Thomassé (2000a); Havet (2002).
  6. ^ Kühn, Mycroft & Osthus (2011a).
  7. ^ a b c Reid & Wormald (1983).
  8. ^ Havet & Thomassé (2000b).
  9. ^ In Havet (2002), but jointly credited to Thomassé in that paper.
  10. ^ This is a corrected version of Burr's conjecture from Wormald (1983).

References

[edit | edit source]
  • Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value)..
  • Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).. As cited by Wormald (1983).
  • Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value)..
  • Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value)..
  • Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value)..
  • Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value)..
  • Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value)..
  • Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value)..
  • Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value)..
  • Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value)..
  • Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value)..
  • Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value)..
  • Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value)..
  • Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value)..
[edit | edit source]