Staunch Book Prize

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The Staunch Book Prize is an award given to thriller novels that avoid featuring violence to women. British writer and screenwriter Bridget Lawless founded the prize in 2018. Some writers object to the premise of the award, referring to it as a "gag order" and accusing it of censorship.[1]

Background

[edit | edit source]

But we are concerned about the way that women are depicted as the victims of extreme torture, rape and murder, graphically described, bloody, terrifying and prolonged, normalised and offered up as entertainment. And guess what, so are lots of people, including readers who reject it by preference, and those working to end violence towards women.

Bridget Lawless[2]

Lawless established the prize in 2018 after she noticed the number of films that used rape as a plot device in the 2017 British Academy of Film and Television Arts (BAFTA) award nominees,[2] and was inspired by the Time's Up[3] and Me Too[4] movements, to encourage alternatives to violence-against-women tropes.[5]

The official website describes the criteria as "a novel in the thriller genre in which no woman is beaten, stalked, sexually exploited, raped or murdered."[6] The Staunch Book Prize is open to traditionally published, self-published and not-yet-published works[2] and awards £2,000 (funded by Lawless).[5] The entry fee is £20.[7]

The annual winner is announced on November 25, which is the International Day for the Elimination of Violence against Women.[2] The original novel prize was suspended for 2021 and was projected to return in 2022.[8] In 2022, the Staunch Book Prize closed.[9]

Controversy

[edit | edit source]

Several writers criticized the Staunch Book Prize. Crime writer Sarah Hilary equated the prize criteria with silencing the voices of domestic violence victims, and called it "not a prize so much as a gagging order".[1] Domestic noir writer Julia Crouch said "what that kind of prize immediately knocks out is the lived experience of millions of women in this country".[10]

In World Literature Today, writer Janet Clark counters the criticism by saying "the prize is one way of drawing attention toward an undeniable trend of using horrific and perverse brutality as cheap plot devices. And it works: people talk about it."[11] Hallie Rubenhold, writing in The Guardian, calls the prize "noble in sentiment", while acknowledging Val McDermid's argument that "acts of misogyny and violence against women are being committed, they need to be written about, and not swept under the carpet."[12]

The first winner of the prize, Jock Serong, says the prize addresses "that laziness that creeps in, the tropes where women and girls are used unthinkingly as default victims in the story."[7] Slate notes that the debate over the prize accomplishes the prize's purpose of drawing attention to the use of violence against women in fiction.[13]

Winners

[edit | edit source]

Shortlist

[edit | edit source]
Year Author Work Result Ref
2018 Jock Serong On the Java Ridge Won [17]
Peter Adamson The Kennedy Moment Shortlisted
Alison Gaylin If I Die Tonight Shortlisted
Anna Porter The Appraisal Shortlisted
Khurrum Rahman East of Hounslow Shortlisted
Joyce Thompson Cops & Queens Shortlisted
2019 Samantha Harvey The Western Wind Won [18]
Brenda Brooks Honey: A Novel Shortlisted
Hannelore Cayre The Godmother Shortlisted
Lawrence Osborne Only to Sleep Shortlisted
August Thomas Liar's Candle: A Novel Shortlisted
2020 Attica Locke Heaven, My Home Won [19]
Fiona Erskine The Chemical Reaction Shortlisted
Aimee Liu Glorious Boy Shortlisted
Ottessa Moshfegh Death in Her Hands Shortlisted
Jock Serong The Burning Island Shortlisted
Paul Vidich The Coldest Warrior Shortlisted

References

[edit | edit source]
  1. ^ a b Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  2. ^ a b c d Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  3. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  4. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  5. ^ a b Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  6. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  7. ^ a b Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  8. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  9. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  10. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  11. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  12. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  13. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  14. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  15. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  16. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  17. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  18. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  19. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).