Rhipicephalus

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Rhipicephalus
File:Rhipicephalus sanguineus.jpg
Rhipicephalus sanguineus
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Arthropoda
Subphylum: Chelicerata
Class: Arachnida
Order: Ixodida
Family: Ixodidae
Genus: Rhipicephalus
Koch, 1844[1]
Type species
Ixodes sanguineus
Latreille, 1806
Species

90 species, see text.

Ixodidae
Ixodidae cladogram after Barker et al., (2024)[2]

Rhipicephalus is a genus of hard ticks in the family Ixodidae, consisting of about 90 species.[3] While many species are native to tropical Africa, the genus is cosmopolitan, being found across the world.[4] Several species are vectors of significant human and animal pathogens.

Morphology

[edit | edit source]

Rhipicephalus ticks are commonly called 'brown ticks' as they are mostly brown in colour.[5] Most adult ticks in this genus do not have colour patterns on their scutum (inornate).[5] Many taxa are very similar, without clear distinguishing features. Identification is often further frustrated by intraspecies variation.[6][5] While males are reliably distinct, instar and female specimens are sometimes impossible to identify due to the lack of differential morphological features.[6][7][5]

Disease potential

[edit | edit source]

Rhipicephalus parasitism is of significant economic, medical, and veterinary importance. Many species are vectors of pathogens of humans and animals, including causing East Coast fever, anaplasmosis, babesiosis, rickettsiosis,[4] Boutonneuse fever, Lyme disease, Q fever, Rocky Mountain spotted fever, NSDV and Crimean–Congo hemorrhagic fever.[8][9] In addition to the infectious agents spread by ticks, tick bites can lead to allergic and toxic reactions.[10][11]

Some species can cause tick paralysis by injecting a neurotoxin with their bite, such as Rhipicephalus evertsi and Rhipicephalus warburtoni.[12]

Sex pheromone studies

[edit | edit source]

A number of Rhipicephalus spp. females produce phenol and p-cresol after being fed for six days. These compounds may act as sex pheromones since these compounds were shown to be the sex pheromone of Rhipicephalus appendiculatus.[13]

Etymology

[edit | edit source]

The name Rhipicephalus is derived from the Greek word rhiphis, meaning "fan-like",[citation needed] and κεφαλή, kephalē, meaning "head". The two terms are related to the hexagonal basis capituli of Rhipicephalus.

Species

[edit | edit source]

As of 2025, the genus contains 90 recognised species:[14]

Unrecognised

[edit | edit source]

Rhipicephalus sanguineus species complex

[edit | edit source]

Rhipicephalus includes a clade centred around the brown dog tick, Rhipicephalus sanguineus. The taxonomy is currently in flux as phylogenies are developed. The species complex contains 16 known species-level lineages, but these often do not map singularly or wholly onto known species. Some species that are prima facie in the complex are yet to be sequenced:[23][24]

  • R. afranicus Bakkes, 2020 - 'Afrotropical lineage'
  • R. camicasi Morel, Mouchet & Rodhain, 1976
  • R. guilhoni Morel & Vassiliades, 1963
  • R. leporis Pomerantsev, 1946 [g]
  • R. linnaei Audouin, 1826 - 'tropical lineage'
  • R. moucheti Morel, 1965 [h]
  • R. pumilio Schulze, 1935
  • R. pusillus Gil Collado, 1936
  • R. rossicus Yakimov & Kol-Yakimova, 1911
  • R. rutilus Koch, 1844 - 'southeastern European lineage'
  • R. sanguineus sensu stricto Latreille, 1806
  • R. schulzei Olenev 1929 [i]
  • R. secundus Feldman-Muhsam, 1952
  • R. sulcatus Neumann, 1908
  • R. turanicus Pomerantsev, 1936

Suspect

[edit | edit source]
  • Rhipicephalus bergeoni Morel & Balis, 1976 [j]
  • Rhipicephalus hibericus Millán, Rodriguez-Pastor & Estrada-Peña, 2024 [k]

Subgenus Boophilus

[edit | edit source]

Boophilus was once considered a separate genus, but studies in the early 2000s resulted in Boophilus being made a subgenus of Rhipicephalus.[25] Although Boophilus has been included in the Rhipicephalus genus, their morphology is different from the typical Rhipicephalus species.[6][7]

Notes

[edit | edit source]
  1. ^ Provisionally valid; possibly a synonym of R. ziemanni
  2. ^ Treated as a synonym of R. pseudolongus in Walker et al. (2000)
  3. ^ R. hibericus is suspect. Millán et al. (2024) described R. hibericus from ticks, relying primarily on reproductive isolation experiments, but used specimens (Zaragoza, Spain) that were not from the type locality (Montpellier, France). Kelava et al. (2025) and Dantas-Torres (2024) both found that the species was not distinct, genetically, from R. sanguineus s.s.
  4. ^ Females and instars are very similar to R. pulchellus
  5. ^ Highly similar to R. jeanneli
  6. ^ Invalid as a nomen nudum as per Guglielmone et al. (2010)
  7. ^ This species has not been confirmed to cluster, genetically, within the complex.
  8. ^ This species has not been confirmed to cluster, genetically, within the complex.
  9. ^ This species has not been confirmed to cluster, genetically, within the complex.
  10. ^ Although R. burgeoni is traditionally included in the species complex, it has not been able to be resolved within the group. Dantas‑Torres et al (2024) considers it separate.
  11. ^ Although Millán et al (2024) describe the species with differential morphology and reproductive isolation, Kelava et al (2025) found the species clusters with the R. sanguineus s.s. clade with a pairwise genetic difference of less than 0.5% Dantas-Torres, Sousa-Paula & Otranto (2024) report similar findings. R. hibericus is likely a synonym of R. sanguineus sensu stricto.

References

[edit | edit source]
  1. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  2. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  3. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  4. ^ a b Olwoch, J. M., et al. (2007). Climate change and the genus Rhipicephalus (Acari: Ixodidae) in Africa. Onderstepoort J Vet Res 74(1), 45-72.
  5. ^ a b c d Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  6. ^ a b c Beati, L. and J. E. Keirans. (2001). Analysis of the systematic relationships among ticks of the genera Rhipicephalus and Boophilus (Acari: Ixodidae) based on mitochondrial 12S ribosomal DNA gene sequences and morphological characters. The Journal of Parasitology 87(1), 32.
  7. ^ a b Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  8. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  9. ^ Rhipicephalus. Archived 2010-02-05 at the Wayback Machine Tick Identification Key. University of Lincoln.
  10. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  11. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  12. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  13. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  14. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  15. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  16. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  17. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  18. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  19. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  20. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  21. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  22. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  23. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  24. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  25. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).

Further reading

[edit | edit source]
  • Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
[edit | edit source]

Lua error in Module:Taxonbar at line 165: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).