Ramification group

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

In number theory, more specifically in local class field theory, the ramification groups are a filtration of the Galois group of a local field extension, which gives detailed information on the ramification phenomena of the extension.

Ramification theory of valuations

[edit | edit source]

In mathematics, the ramification theory of valuations studies the set of extensions of a valuation v of a field K to an extension L of K. It is a generalization of the ramification theory of Dedekind domains.[1][2]

The structure of the set of extensions is known better when L/K is Galois.

Decomposition group and inertia group

[edit | edit source]

Let (Kv) be a valued field and let L be a finite Galois extension of K. Let Sv be the set of equivalence classes of extensions of v to L and let G be the Galois group of L over K. Then G acts on Sv by σ[w] = [w ∘ σ] (i.e. w is a representative of the equivalence class [w] ∈ Sv and [w] is sent to the equivalence class of the composition of w with the automorphism σ : LL; this is independent of the choice of w in [w]). In fact, this action is transitive.

Given a fixed extension w of v to L, the decomposition group of w is the stabilizer subgroup Gw of [w], i.e. it is the subgroup of G consisting of all elements that fix the equivalence class [w] ∈ Sv.

Let mw denote the maximal ideal of w inside the valuation ring Rw of w. The inertia group of w is the subgroup Iw of Gw consisting of elements σ such that σx ≡ x (mod mw) for all x in Rw. In other words, Iw consists of the elements of the decomposition group that act trivially on the residue field of w. It is a normal subgroup of Gw.

The reduced ramification index e(w/v) is independent of w and is denoted e(v). Similarly, the relative degree f(w/v) is also independent of w and is denoted f(v).

Ramification groups in lower numbering

[edit | edit source]

Ramification groups are a refinement of the Galois group G of a finite L/K Galois extension of local fields. We shall write w,𝒪L,𝔭 for the valuation, the ring of integers and its maximal ideal for L. As a consequence of Hensel's lemma, one can write 𝒪L=𝒪K[α] for some αL where 𝒪K is the ring of integers of K.[3] (This is stronger than the primitive element theorem.) Then, for each integer i1, we define Gi to be the set of all sG that satisfies the following equivalent conditions.

  • (i) s operates trivially on 𝒪L/𝔭i+1.
  • (ii) w(s(x)x)i+1 for all x𝒪L
  • (iii) w(s(α)α)i+1.

The group Gi is called i-th ramification group. They form a decreasing filtration,

G1=GG0G1{*}.

In fact, the Gi are normal by (i) and trivial for sufficiently large i by (iii). For the lowest indices, it is customary to call G0 the inertia subgroup of G because of its relation to splitting of prime ideals, while G1 the wild inertia subgroup of G. The quotient G0/G1 is called the tame quotient.

The Galois group G and its subgroups Gi are studied by employing the above filtration or, more specifically, the corresponding quotients. In particular,

  • G/G0=Gal(l/k), where l,k are the (finite) residue fields of L,K.[4]
  • G0=1L/K is unramified.
  • G1=1L/K is tamely ramified (i.e., the ramification index is prime to the residue characteristic.)

The study of ramification groups reduces to the totally ramified case since one has Gi=(G0)i for i0.

One also defines the function iG(s)=w(s(α)α),sG. (ii) in the above shows iG is independent of choice of α and, moreover, the study of the filtration Gi is essentially equivalent to that of iG.[5] iG satisfies the following: for s,tG,

  • iG(s)i+1sGi.
  • iG(tst1)=iG(s).
  • iG(st)min{iG(s),iG(t)}.

Fix a uniformizer π of L. Then ss(π)/π induces the injection Gi/Gi+1UL,i/UL,i+1,i0 where UL,0=𝒪L×,UL,i=1+𝔭i. (The map actually does not depend on the choice of the uniformizer.[6]) It follows from this[7]

  • G0/G1 is cyclic of order prime to p
  • Gi/Gi+1 is a product of cyclic groups of order p.

In particular, G1 is a p-group and G0 is solvable.

The ramification groups can be used to compute the different 𝔇L/K of the extension L/K and that of subextensions:[8]

w(𝔇L/K)=s1iG(s)=i=0(|Gi|1).

If H is a normal subgroup of G, then, for σG, iG/H(σ)=1eL/KsσiG(s).[9]

Combining this with the above one obtains: for a subextension F/K corresponding to H,

vF(𝔇F/K)=1eL/Fs∉HiG(s).

If sGi,tGj,i,j1, then sts1t1Gi+j+1.[10] In the terminology of Lazard, this can be understood to mean the Lie algebra gr(G1)=i1Gi/Gi+1 is abelian.

Example: the cyclotomic extension

[edit | edit source]

The ramification groups for a cyclotomic extension Kn:=𝐐p(ζ)/𝐐p, where ζ is a pn-th primitive root of unity, can be described explicitly:[11]

Gs=Gal(Kn/Ke),

where e is chosen such that pe1s<pe.

Example: a quartic extension

[edit | edit source]

Let K be the extension of Q2 generated by x1=2+2. The conjugates of x1 are x2=22, x3=x1, x4=x2.

A little computation shows that the quotient of any two of these is a unit. Hence they all generate the same ideal; call it π. 2 generates π2; (2)=π4.

Now x1x3=2x1, which is in π5.

and x1x2=422, which is in π3.

Various methods show that the Galois group of K is C4, cyclic of order 4. Also:

G0=G1=G2=C4.

and G3=G4=(13)(24).

w(𝔇K/Q2)=3+3+3+1+1=11, so that the different 𝔇K/Q2=π11

x1 satisfies X4 − 4X2 + 2, which has discriminant 2048 = 211.

Ramification groups in upper numbering

[edit | edit source]

If u is a real number 1, let Gu denote Gi where i the least integer u. In other words, sGuiG(s)u+1. Define ϕ by[12]

ϕ(u)=0udt(G0:Gt)

where, by convention, (G0:Gt) is equal to (G1:G0)1 if t=1 and is equal to 1 for 1<t0.[13] Then ϕ(u)=u for 1u0. It is immediate that ϕ is continuous and strictly increasing, and thus has the continuous inverse function ψ defined on [1,). Define Gv=Gψ(v). Gv is then called the v-th ramification group in upper numbering. In other words, Gϕ(u)=Gu. Note G1=G,G0=G0. The upper numbering is defined so as to be compatible with passage to quotients:[14] if H is normal in G, then

(G/H)v=GvH/H for all v

(whereas lower numbering is compatible with passage to subgroups.)

Herbrand's theorem

[edit | edit source]

Herbrand's theorem states that the ramification groups in the lower numbering satisfy GuH/H=(G/H)v (for v=ϕL/F(u) where L/F is the subextension corresponding to H), and that the ramification groups in the upper numbering satisfy GuH/H=(G/H)u.[15][16] This allows one to define ramification groups in the upper numbering for infinite Galois extensions (such as the absolute Galois group of a local field) from the inverse system of ramification groups for finite subextensions.

The upper numbering for an abelian extension is important because of the Hasse–Arf theorem. It states that if G is abelian, then the jumps in the filtration Gv are integers; i.e., Gi=Gi+1 whenever ϕ(i) is not an integer.[17]

The upper numbering is compatible with the filtration of the norm residue group by the unit groups under the Artin isomorphism. The image of Gn(L/K) under the isomorphism

G(L/K)abK*/NL/K(L*)

is just[18]

UKn/(UKnNL/K(L*)) .

See also

[edit | edit source]

Notes

[edit | edit source]
  1. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  2. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  3. ^ Neukirch (1999) p.178
  4. ^ since G/G0 is canonically isomorphic to the decomposition group.
  5. ^ Serre (1979) p.62
  6. ^ Conrad
  7. ^ Use UL,0/UL,1l× and UL,i/UL,i+1l+
  8. ^ Serre (1979) 4.1 Prop.4, p.64
  9. ^ Serre (1979) 4.1. Prop.3, p.63
  10. ^ Serre (1979) 4.2. Proposition 10.
  11. ^ Serre, Corps locaux. Ch. IV, §4, Proposition 18
  12. ^ Serre (1967) p.156
  13. ^ Neukirch (1999) p.179
  14. ^ Serre (1967) p.155
  15. ^ Neukirch (1999) p.180
  16. ^ Serre (1979) p.75
  17. ^ Neukirch (1999) p.355
  18. ^ Snaith (1994) pp.30-31

References

[edit | edit source]
  • B. Conrad, Math 248A. Higher ramification groups
  • Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  • Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  • Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  • Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  • Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).