Quantum clock model

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The quantum clock model is a quantum lattice model.[1] It is a generalisation of the transverse-field Ising model . It is defined on a lattice with N states on each site. The Hamiltonian of this model is

H=J(i,j(ZiZj+ZiZj)+gj(Xj+Xj))

Here, the subscripts refer to lattice sites, and the sum i,j is done over pairs of nearest neighbour sites i and j. The clock matrices Xj and Zj are N×N generalisations of the Pauli matrices satisfying

ZjXk=e2πiNδj,kXkZj and XjN=ZjN=1

where δj,k is 1 if j and k are the same site and zero otherwise. J is a prefactor with dimensions of energy, and g is another coupling coefficient that determines the relative strength of the external field compared to the nearest neighbor interaction.

The model obeys a global N symmetry, which is generated by the unitary operator UX=jXj where the product is over every site of the lattice. In other words, UX commutes with the Hamiltonian.

When N=2 the quantum clock model is identical to the transverse-field Ising model. When N=3 the quantum clock model is equivalent to the quantum three-state Potts model. When N=4, the model is again equivalent to the Ising model. When N>4, strong evidences have been found that the phase transitions exhibited in these models should be certain generalizations [2] of Kosterlitz–Thouless transition, whose physical nature is still largely unknown.

One-dimensional model

[edit | edit source]

There are various analytical methods that can be used to study the quantum clock model specifically in one dimension.

Kramers–Wannier duality

[edit | edit source]

A nonlocal mapping of clock matrices known as the Kramers–Wannier duality transformation can be done as follows:[3] Xj~=ZjZj+1Z~jZ~j+1=Xj+1 Then, in terms of the newly defined clock matrices with tildes, which obey the same algebraic relations as the original clock matrices, the Hamiltonian is simply H=Jgj(Z~jZ~j+1+g1X~j+h.c.). This indicates that the model with coupling parameter g is dual to the model with coupling parameter g1, and establishes a duality between the ordered phase and the disordered phase.

Note that there are some subtle considerations at the boundaries of the one dimensional chain; as a result of these, the degeneracy and N symmetry properties of phases are changed under the Kramers–Wannier duality. A more careful analysis involves coupling the theory to a N gauge field; fixing the gauge reproduces the results of the Kramers Wannier transformation.

Phase transition

[edit | edit source]

For N=2,3,4, there is a unique phase transition from the ordered phase to the disordered phase at g=1. The model is said to be "self-dual" because Kramers–Wannier transformation transforms the Hamiltonian to itself. For N>4, there are two phase transition points at g1<1 and g2=1/g1>1. Strong evidences have been found that these phase transitions should be a class of generalizations[2] of Kosterlitz–Thouless transition. The KT transition predicts that the free energy has an essential singularity that goes like ec|ggc|, while perturbative study found that the essential singularity behaves as ec|ggc|σ where σ goes from 0.2 to 0.5 as N increases from 5 to 9. The physical pictures[4] of these phase transitions are still not clear.

Jordan–Wigner transformation

[edit | edit source]

Another nonlocal mapping known as the Jordan Wigner transformation can be used to express the theory in terms of parafermions.

References

[edit | edit source]
  1. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  2. ^ a b Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  3. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  4. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).