Nesting (voting districts)

| Part of the Politics series |
| Elections |
|---|
| Lua error in mw.title.lua at line 392: bad argument #2 to 'title.new' (unrecognized namespace name 'Portal'). |
Nesting is the delimitation of voting districts for one elected body in order to define the voting districts for another body.[1]
The major concerns of nesting are that it may impede the creation of majority-minority districts, and that it may cause cities or other communities of interest to be split into different voting districts and therefore dilute their votes.
By country
[edit | edit source]Fiji
[edit | edit source]Under the 1970 constitution, Fiji had ten National constituencies. Each of them elected one indigenous Fijian member and one Indo-Fijian member on its own, but two national constituencies were nested into one for the election of General electors' representatives.[2]
Poland
[edit | edit source]The voting districts for the Senate of the Republic of Poland have to be within the bounds of the voting districts of the Sejm of the Republic of Poland.[3]
United Kingdom
[edit | edit source]The Scottish Parliament and Senedd Cymru are elected using an Additional member system, combining single-member constituencies with a party-list component chosen to ensure overall proportional representation across the chamber. To elect this proportional component, single-member constituencies are nested together within larger multi-member regions. In addition, the single-member constituencies in the Senedd are identical to those used for the UK House of Commons; this was also the case in Scotland until the Fifth Periodic Review of Westminster constituencies.
United States
[edit | edit source]
The US states which have nesting in their state legislatures (with the ratio of lower house to upper):
- Alaska (2/1)[4]
- Arizona (2/1)[5] (districts are identical)
- Illinois (2/1)[6]
- Iowa (2/1)[7]
- Maryland (3/1)[8] (29 of 47 districts are identical)
- Minnesota (2/1)[9]
- Montana (2/1)[10]
- New Jersey (2/1)[11] (districts are identical)
- North Dakota (2/1)[12] (46 of 47 districts are identical)
- Ohio (3/1)[13]
- Oregon (2/1)[14]
- South Dakota (2/1)[15] (33 of 35 districts are identical)
- Washington (2/1)[16] (districts are identical)
- Wisconsin (3/1)[17]
In addition there are four states with exact ratios (California, Hawaii[dubious – discuss], New York[dubious – discuss], and Wyoming) that encourage, but do not require, nesting of legislative districts.[18] Two other states with uneven lower-upper house ratios (Rhode Island and Utah) encourage nesting between legislative and congressional districts. Five other states (Florida, Idaho, Indiana, Nevada and Tennessee) have a lower-to-upper house seat ratio of either 2:1 or 3:1, but do not feature nesting in their laws on redistricting.
References
[edit | edit source]- ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
- ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
- ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
- ^ All about Redistricting - Alaska
- ^ All about Redistricting - Arizona
- ^ Illinois Constitution Article IV, Section 2(b) http://www.ilga.gov/commission/lrb/con4.htm
- ^ All about Redistricting - Iowa
- ^ All about Redistricting -Maryland
- ^ All about Redistricting - Minnesota
- ^ All about Redistricting -Montana
- ^ All about Redistricting - New Jersey
- ^ All about Redistricting - North Dakota
- ^ All about Redistricting - Ohio
- ^ All about Redistricting - Oregon
- ^ All about Redistricting - South Dakota
- ^ All about Redistricting - Washington
- ^ All about Redistricting -Wisconsin
- ^ Where the lines are drawn by the Brennan Center for Justice
Further reading
[edit | edit source]- Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).