MyWiki:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/Archive/2025/August

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Proposals, August 2025

Minas Gerais geography stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Over 600 articles, this one will be a bit difficult as I cant find a decent category structure to use as a basis for a petscan search, it seems the regions changes in 2017? so a hand search will be needed at least to complete this. Obviously templates first, categories iff they pass 60.

Waacstats (talk) 16:41, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Erebinae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Over 600, needs a resort as it looks like some genus have moved out of one sub cat, to catch some of this I propose:

Waacstats (talk) 16:41, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

Support this and all of the below. Helps clean things up :D - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:53, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Marginellidae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Another one over 600, looking at the category alot begin Marginella therefore I propose:

Waacstats (talk) 16:41, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Hepialidae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Over 600 articles, could do with a trim. the following are viable based on names rather categories:

Waacstats (talk) 16:41, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Pooideae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was crate.
over 600 articles, the following appears viable:

Waacstats (talk) 16:41, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Heterobranchia stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
These are both a bit odd, I have found 200 articles that belong in a sub-category or sub-sub-category the only problem is one is a "Parent only" and therefore don't have a general stub tag, the other is also "parent only" and its stub tag redirects to its grandparent I propose removing the parent only status from the two categories below and creating the matching template to allow articles from smaller sub-categories of the perm cats a way into these categories and un-redirecting the existing template to the correct category:

Waacstats (talk) 16:41, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Bombycoidea stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Another one over 600 articles that could do with a split. I propsoe the following:

Waacstats (talk) 16:41, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

American Civil War biography stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
over 600 articles, I propose splitting out the soldiers and sailors of either side:

for some reason the category has a lower case a for army inn the Union army category, everything else is uppercase so I have followed suit Waacstats (talk) 16:41, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

New South Wales geography stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
A good split already started on this +600 category. I propose continuing that split with:

Waacstats (talk) 16:41, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Photography stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
another one over 600, could do with a trim. I believe enough of the articles relate to lenses though I think the petscan results include a number of false positives.

Waacstats (talk) 16:41, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Georgia_(U.S._state)_politician_stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Over 600, could do with a trim I propose following the exammple of many other states and split out the state level politicians. I am not 100% convinced we need the disambig here but thought better to keep it inline with the politician parent:

There will be about 50 overlapping. Waacstats (talk) 16:41, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Faboideae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Over 600 articles I have found the following to be large enough:

Waacstats (talk) 16:41, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Speedy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
This weeks finds:

Waacstats (talk) 16:41, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

 Done - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:51, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split in Turkey

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
A few Provinces in Turkey have over 600 articles and could do with a split. I propose a split by District as per the already split provinces, not all of these will pass 60 so templates first then categories for those that pass the 60 mark:

Waacstats (talk) 16:41, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

Support all the geography stubs - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 04:02, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Two Austrian geo splits

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Both Lower Austria and Styria are starting to get a bit large at over 600 articles. I propose a split by division for both, not all of these will pass 60 so templates first then categories for those that pass the 60 mark:

Waacstats (talk) 16:41, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Võru County geography stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Pushing 700 articles could do with a split I propose splitting by parish, one of these may be a bit short so templates first, categories iff they reach 60:

Waacstats (talk) 16:41, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

Standards and measurement stubs

Closing in on 700 articles, I'd like to propose the following:

Waacstats (talk) 16:41, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Speedy categories

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I will likely create these when I'm at my computer next time:

Might be worth having the -river-stub for each one double upmerged to there as well as the river category (look at my speedy from last week), might also make a couple of other counties viable?. Waacstats (talk) 08:08, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Spilomelinae sub-stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Some of the stubs in Spilomelinae stubs are of the Hydririni tribe; as such, I'd like to propose a subcategory/template:

- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:46, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

I also plan on making {{Herpetogrammatini-stub}} for those belonging to the following genera of Herpetogrammatini (these don't have their own stub category):
- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:04, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
Great catch, these need a good breakdown. Waacstats (talk) 08:09, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Coccinellidae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Coccinellidae stubs is hella big; I propose making the following sub-stubs (based on subfamily, tribe, then genera): Coccinellinae stubs, {{Coccinellinae-stub}}

Epilachnini stubs, {{Epilachnini-stub}}

Scymninae stubs, {{Scymninae-stub}}

Sticholotidinae stubs, {{Sticholotidinae-stub}}

- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 00:35, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

Support, however I would suggest making templates for the tribe level, I think there are other genera that could go there and if there aren't now there may be in the future if the biologist decide to move genera around. Waacstats (talk) 08:14, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
I just included the tribe templates in my request. I'm getting ready to go to class - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 13:46, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
A note to any admins looking for any empty categories: I'm currently working on these, but I'm not at home right now - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 18:13, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Ardabil province geography sub-stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Main stub category: Ardabil province geography stubs. I'm back before school starts to make proposals:

Looks good, glad to see you back! Waacstats (talk) 08:16, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Crambini stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Over 650 articles, perm cat has no sub cats however I propose th following based on links to category:

Waacstats (talk) 21:57, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Flavobacteria stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Safetly in the 600+ articles, I would like to propose the following:

Waacstats (talk) 21:57, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

Tineidae stubs

Closing in on 700 I propose the following:

Waacstats (talk) 21:57, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

Ulidiidae

Another one pushing 700 articles:

Waacstats (talk) 21:57, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

Support all of the above :D - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:00, 27 August 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Actinomycetota

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Close to 700 articles so could do with a split. I therefore propose the following:

Waacstats (talk) 21:57, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Rugby union orgs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Not desperatly needed but will tidy up the parent categories

Waacstats (talk) 21:57, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

Per the parent cat & previous stub formats, I think this should be "Rugby union organisation stubs" and "Rugbyunion-org-stub". Her Pegship (?) 19:46, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
Good spot, I obviously didn't update my quick note to propose it properly. Waacstats (talk) 10:53, 26 August 2025 (UTC)
So now should be Rugby union organisation stubs {{Rugbyunion-org-stub}} Waacstats (talk) 11:58, 26 August 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of steroids

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Category is over 600 could do with a split

Waacstats (talk) 21:57, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Speedies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
This weeks over 60

Waacstats (talk) 21:57, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

Support I'm creating them right now - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:07, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
Also, @Waacstats, how do you find these large stub templates? I'd love to know :D - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:08, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
They are just ones I come across. I wish I had an easier way of finding them though. Waacstats (talk) 08:04, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Speedys

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
This weeks list of new categories where the associated tempalte(s) have passed the 60 park:

Waacstats (talk) 12:25, 18 August 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Apocynaceae

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
A nother one over 700 pages, I propose the following:

Waacstats (talk) 12:25, 18 August 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Hypsogastropoda stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
This one looks reaady to split, at 668 pages and 51 categories, all the pages are already using by genus(?) templates I propose we use the next layer down that the perm cats use which would mean the following categories:

Waacstats (talk) 12:25, 18 August 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Limenitidinae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Anouther biological category with over 700 articles. I propose the following split based on perm cats:

I'm not 100% convinced on the name for the second one, I'm not convinced we need the disambig for either the template or the category but the perrm cat uses it so? anyone any ideas? Waacstats (talk) 12:25, 18 August 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Miridae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Another over 700, I propose the following based on perm cats:

Waacstats (talk) 12:25, 18 August 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Milesiini stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Category is approaching 750 I propose the following based on names and not categories as the parent has no perm sub cats.

Waacstats (talk) 12:25, 18 August 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Mesostigmata stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Another tree of life category pushing 800, I propose the following based on perm cats:

Waacstats (talk) 12:25, 18 August 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Staphylinidae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Pushing 800 articles, I propose the following splits:

Waacstats (talk) 12:25, 18 August 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Speedy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
A few speediable categories:

Waacstats (talk) 20:14, 10 August 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Large Olympic medalists stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
The Dutch, French, German, Swedish and Soviet subcats have recently grown to over 600 and I would like to cut these back a bit. A few other countries could do with a trim as well:

Waacstats (talk) 20:14, 10 August 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Sports biographies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
A couple of Sports biographies without stub categories. I propose the following category which should be viable based on articles that have asbox (atleast one stub template).

Waacstats (talk) 20:14, 10 August 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Ascomycota stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
This category has a number of large subcats, I would like to propose the following categories and templates

Waacstats (talk) 20:14, 10 August 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Cumberland geography stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Over 700 articles, we have 2 non-metropolitan I propose using these to split them.

I have followed the article and permcat for disambiging Cumberland UA nd historic county. Waacstats (talk) 18:19, 3 August 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Theclinae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Over 700 articles, could do with a split:

All appear viable per the parent cats. Waacstats (talk) 18:19, 3 August 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Protein stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Over 800 articles we already of 1 split by location so I thought the following would be useful, it will still be oversized but not not quite so oversized

Waacstats (talk) 18:19, 3 August 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Speedy categories

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
some upmerged templates that have passed the 60 mark.

and some categories each from a number of templates:

Waacstats (talk) 18:19, 3 August 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Biologist

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Some refining is possible with the following:

Waacstats (talk) 18:19, 3 August 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Retrieved from "http://70.231.62.181/index.php?title=MyWiki:WikiProject_Stub_sorting/Proposals/Archive/2025/August&oldid=24829057"