MyWiki:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/Archive/2014/March

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Proposals, March 2014

Category:Human migration stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was do not create.
I suggest creating this category, it's a really important topic and it hasn't got a category yet. 15:00, 29 March 2014

If you look at WP:WSS/P#Proposing new stub types – procedure, you'll see that it asks you to "find a good number of stub articles, as many as you can, that will fit that template"; so, what articles would you put in your proposed stub category? --Redrose64 (talk) 15:05, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
- This one, for example: Immigrant language — Preceding unsigned comment added by Darekkk (talk • contribs) 20:08, 29 March 2014‎
That's easily stub-sorted - {{Sociolinguistics-stub}} places it into Category:Linguistics stubs and Category:Sociology stubs. But that's just one - you really need 60. --Redrose64 (talk) 20:28, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:2000s rock song stubs split

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I propose splittting Category:2000s rock song stubs by decade:

With over 500 articles now, the category could approach thousands of articles by the end of the century. --Jax 0677 (talk) 23:51, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

It shouldn't need a split. Stub categories beginning "2000s" are always for a decade, not a century. --Redrose64 (talk) 00:00, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
I agree. If editors are adding the 2000s song stub into articles for 2010s songs, they are doing so incorrectly. Such songs that could be placed in the suggested stub template should be placed in both {{2010s-song-stub}} and {{rock-song-stub}}. When the number of song articles in both categories reach 60 (which I believe is the threshold), the 2010s-rock-song-stub can be created through proper procedures. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 00:46, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
  • I'm not a regular here, but I know CfD. It seems to me that the 2010s rock song stub category is going to be needed and, as someone has created it, it should be retained now—all the more so, as the latest official specific rock song stub "2000s" is likely to be misunderstood by some inexperienced editors. – Fayenatic London 16:54, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
  • Reply - I agree with Fayenatic London on this one. Whether it is incorrect or not, inexperienced users who do not see a 2010s template available may use the 2000s template in its place, irrespective of whether it is correct. If other decades from the 20th century have required this, I am almost certain that decades in the 21st century will require it as well. --Jax 0677 (talk) 18:00, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
The normal process at WSS/P is that we create a decade-specific category when there is a demonstrable need, and not speculatively. Very few stub cats exist for centuries; in fact the only one that I know of is Category:20th-century play stubs and of its ten decades, six have their own subcategories, the other four upmerge. --Redrose64 (talk) 18:06, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
Comment While splitting is the wrong proposal here, I took it upon myself to diffuse Category:Rock song stubs, populating Category:2010s rock song stubs to 70 stub articles. I'm sure further digging within Category:2010s song stubs and Category:2000s rock song stubs will find more candidates for inclusion. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 03:01, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:New York City building and structure stubs split

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I propose splittting Category:New York City building and structure stubs by borough:

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Jazz composition templates by decade

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create upmerged templates.
We currently have {{jazz-composition-stub}} but I think it makes sense to have:

Category:Jazz composition stubs has 325 articles, I think some of them could be split by decade, what d'ya think?♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:37, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Suggestion: first start with upmerged templates, then let's see if any of them deserves a separate category. Regards, --Fadesga (talk) 01:59, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
I agree with Fadesga - just do it and create the category for any decade once you pass 60 for it. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 04:52, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:San Francisco Bay Area building and structure stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I propose creating Category:San Francisco Bay Area building and structure stubs, which would include:

עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 21:06, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Support all.♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:37, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

{{Jazz-venue-stub}}

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
For stubs on jazz clubs and venues. This jazz club or venue is a stub... ♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:22, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:National association football team stubs split into four groups

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.

Maiō T. (talk) 20:55, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

So, I created these three categories & templates. Maiō T. (talk) 22:47, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Disease stubs split

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Speedy request. Would like subcategories for this huge category. Propose Category:Circulatory disease stubs, Category:Nervous system disease stubs, Category:Musculoskeletal disease stubs and Category:Respiratory disease stubs. The templates are already present and upmerged to the Disease stubs category.

Thanks! EricEnfermero HOWDY! 13:00, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

Looks like a speedy S1 case here. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 20:33, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Wyoming building and structure stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I thiml we should create Category:Wyoming building and structure stub - this would include 2 {{Wyoming-struct-stub}}s, 28 {{Wyoming-bridge-struct-stub}}s, 25 {{Wyoming-school-stub}}s, 6 {{Wyoming-sports-venue-stub}}s, 4 {{Wyoming-airport-stub}}, 4 {{Wyoming-railstation-stub}}, and 2 {{Wyoming-hospital-stub}}s - a total of 71. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 04:04, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

  • Speedy support per S2 - all the other 48 states (plus DC) have cats. --Redrose64 (talk) 21:09, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Hawaii building and structure stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I think we should create Category:Hawaii building and structure stubs - in addition to the 31 articles populating Category:Hawaii school stubs (an obvious child of the proposed category, although whether or not it should exist is a separate question), we have 21 {{Hawaii-struct-stub}}s, 5 {{Hawaii-sports-venue-stub}}s, 2 {{Hawaii-hospital-stub}}s, and 1 each of {{Hawaii-airport-stub}}, {{Hawaii-bridge-struct-stub}} and {{Hawaii-hotel-stub}} - a total of 63 stubs. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 22:01, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

  • Speedy support per S2 - all the other 48 states (plus DC) have cats. --Redrose64 (talk) 21:09, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:American tunnel stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I propose creating Category:American tunnel stubs - {{US-tunnel-stub}} is up to 64 transclusions. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 21:18, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:United States hospital stubs split

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I propose splitting Category:United States hospital stubs/{{US-hospital-stub}} to have categories by region (as the parent category , Category:United States building and structure stubs, is), and a tag for each state feeding into these categories (or their own for ny state with at least 60 stubs) - a quick scan finds 705 stubs belonging here. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 20:59, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Norwegian tunnel stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Speedy request. To pick up template {{Norway-tunnel-stub}}. 61 tagged articles. Dawynn (talk) 11:35, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Croatian actor stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Speedy request. To pick up template {{Croatia-actor-stub}}. 65 tagged articles. Dawynn (talk) 11:33, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Manhattan railway station stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Category:New York City railway station stubs has passed 200 stubhs already. The only viable child stub category, at this point, would be Category:Manhattan railway station stubs/{{Manhattan-railstation-stub}} - although I can't do a scan right noiw, I know that all the contents of the permcat (100 articles), other than 4 (all from Category:Railroad terminals in New York City - Penn, an older station by the same name, Grand Cenral, and Hudson Terminal), are stubs. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 13:38, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Italian Roman Catholic clergy stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I have just created the upmerged {{Italy-RC-clergy-stub}}, included both in the Category:Italian religious biography stubs and in the Category:Roman Catholic clergy stubs. Further looking into this scan (74 stubs), maybe it could be a good idea to create a special Category:Italian Roman Catholic clergy stubs. What do you say? Regards, --Fadesga (talk) 20:09, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Category created. --Fadesga (talk) 23:31, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Los Angeles, California building and structure stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was .
I propose Category:Los Angeles, California building and structure stubs/{{LosAngeles-struct-stub}} - a quick scan finds 216 stubs here. Didn't go through all of them - but the dozen or so I checked at random all seem to belong, and even a third of these would be more than enough to justify a category. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 11:08, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Speedy support --Fadesga (talk) 20:04, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Texas railway station stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
{{Texas-railstation-stub}} already has 61 transclusions, a number I expect will continue to rise. I propose Category:Texas railway station stubs for this tag. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 16:39, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

  • Speedy support per S1 --Redrose64 (talk) 19:18, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Dallas Area Rapid Transit stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I propose Category:Dallas Area Rapid Transit stubs/{{DART-stub}} - a quick scan finds 63 stubs. Note that the use of abbreviation for the tag and the full name for the category already exists for other systems - e.g Category:Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority stubs/{{MBTA-stub}}. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 16:03, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Retrieved from "http://70.231.62.181/index.php?title=MyWiki:WikiProject_Stub_sorting/Proposals/Archive/2014/March&oldid=19004679"