MyWiki:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/2025/September

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Proposals, September 2025

[edit source]

Cambodia geography sub-stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Cambodia geography stubs is pretty big; I propose the following subcats/temps:

Support looks good to me Waacstats (talk) 21:52, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Mersin Province geography sub-stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Mersin Province geography stubs is pretty beefy; I propose the following splits:

Support looks good to me Waacstats (talk) 21:52, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

South Korean railway station sub-stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
South Korean railway station stubs is pretty big; I propose the following subcategories/templates:

Support no issues here that i can see. Waacstats (talk)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Yorkshire and the Humber railway station sub-stub

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create as revised.
I propose the following as a subcat of Yorkshire and the Humber railway station stubs and Railway stations in Yorkshire:

Given the size of the split is it worth splitting this directly to North/South/West and East Riding? Waacstats (talk) 08:26, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
I'm not keen on having Yorkshire railway station stubs as a single sub-group because they make up the vast bulk of Yorkshire and the Humber railway station stubs: there are comparatively few that aren't in Yorkshire. The ones that would be left behind would comprise those in North Lincolnshire (20 stub articles out of 46) together with those in North East Lincolnshire (2 stub articles out of 36), which even taken together don't have many stations. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 20:30, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Italian railway station sub-stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create as revised.
Italian railway station stubs is pretty big; I propose the following subcategories/templates:

Support the idea here but we normally go with the place name as you have above rather than a demonym. Waacstats (talk) 08:06, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
So it would be Lombardy, Apulia, Lazio and Piedmont for the categories, too? - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 23:58, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
I would say so, for some reason (lost to time) we have gone with demonym for continent and country level but then place name below that, at least from what I can see. Waacstats (talk) 21:55, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Gaziantep Province geography sub-stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Gaziantep Province geography stubs is pretty big; I propose the following subcategories/templates:

Altered the Nizip district for you (missed space) other than that these look ok. Waacstats (talk) 07:59, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Kastamonu Province geography sub-stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Kastamonu Province geography stubs is looking pretty big; I propose the following subcats/temps:

Support these. Waacstats (talk) 08:03, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Castilla–La Mancha geography substubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Castilla–La Mancha geography stubs is pretty beefy; I propose the following subcats/temps:

Not seeing any issues on these. Waacstats (talk) 08:02, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Basque Country geography sub-stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Basque Country geography stubs is pretty big; I propose the following splits:

Other than the Basque being a country rather than a county (I changed the category link) these look goods. Waacstats (talk) 08:01, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
Thanks :D - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 15:10, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Cassidinae stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I have only just proposed a split of this last week and it has doubled in size to over 1200 articles (after I split out 166) I can now find another three genus' that have enough articles for there own templates so propose the following:

These will still leave it oversized but it is a good start. Waacstats (talk) 19:50, 22 September 2025 (UTC)

Support every bit helps! :D - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:46, 25 September 2025 (UTC)
It has gone up to 1900. I propose more:
- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 06:49, 25 September 2025 (UTC)
Support extension of my proposal, hopefully we can get it down somewhere close to a reasonable size. Waacstats (talk) 21:51, 25 September 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

By-elections to the Parliament of the United Kingdom in English constituency stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Starting to get large we have already split out London, I propose we atleast create templates for the other regions and categories for any of those regions that reach 60:

Waacstats (talk) 19:50, 22 September 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Colorado, Louisiana and New Mexico

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
All three states are strating to get large. I would like to propose splitting these with by county templates, categories for any that make 60 and then we can more clearly see what we have regarding regional categories. Templates and categories of the following formats:

Waacstats (talk) 19:50, 22 September 2025 (UTC)

Support, but please be a little more specific, if that makes sense. I don't want to accidentally create something generic... - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 06:51, 25 September 2025 (UTC)
Sorry, given the fact that there is about 64, 64 and 33 counties in each I din't really want to write all of them out. I mean that for example taking Santa Fe County, New Mexico I propose we go with Category:Sante Fe County, New Mexico geography stubs and {{SantaFeNM-geo-stub}}. I hope that makes sense. Waacstats (talk) 21:48, 25 September 2025 (UTC)
Okay - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 03:06, 26 September 2025 (UTC)
Idk maybe I can make a Google spreadsheet for all of them? There will be a lot of copypaste involved, but I wanna know what you think - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 03:07, 26 September 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Veneto geography stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Another Italian category getting large we have previously split Italian regions by Province so propose we follow suit here.

Waacstats (talk) 19:50, 22 September 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Bacteroidota stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
This category was over 600 till it was sorted, could do with some more sub categories to get it down a bit more, based on the permcat I propose the following:

Also to tidy up the largest subcat I propose

Waacstats (talk) 19:50, 22 September 2025 (UTC)

Support the first one has already been created, btw - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 03:07, 26 September 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Kachin State geography stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Another one getting large, we have previously split the Myanmar states by district. This one only has six districts, two of which have categories and seem to have almost all the articles. I propose all the templates anyway just in case someone comes back and finishes these off. As usual templates first categories for those that reach 60:

Waacstats (talk) 19:50, 22 September 2025 (UTC)

Support. I withdrew my version of the request because it was an unintentional duplicate - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 13:45, 23 September 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Cymbidieae stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Yet another one that was getting larger. I propose reducing this down with the following

Waacstats (talk) 19:50, 22 September 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Italian film actors

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Another one getting large, propose we follow suit for other nations and split by decade of birth along the lines of:

Waacstats (talk) 19:50, 22 September 2025 (UTC)

Support, but I think we can go all the way for this one:
- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 03:17, 26 September 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Hemilophini stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
creeping up. The following would help prevent that.

Waacstats (talk) 19:50, 22 September 2025 (UTC)

Support - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:10, 28 September 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Mississippi politician stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Another one getting large, I propose we follow other states and split out the state level politicians

Waacstats (talk) 19:50, 22 September 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Tineidae

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Again creeping up, propose the following:

Waacstats (talk) 19:50, 22 September 2025 (UTC)

Support - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:33, 28 September 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Speedies

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
This weeks list, the 1930s NZ RU bio might be 1 short, but it is close enough and it would look odd going from 20s to 40s, and 1910s is only at 40 so a bit too far away yet.

Waacstats (talk) 19:50, 22 September 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Bolu Province geography sub-stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Bolu Province geography stubs is looking pretty big; I propose the following subtemplates/subcategories:

Support, no issues that I can see. I am beginning to wonder if Turkish Provinces are the new French Departments. Waacstats (talk) 13:03, 23 September 2025 (UTC)
I hope not - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 06:52, 25 September 2025 (UTC)
@Waacstats I created them :D - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:49, 28 September 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Aegean region geography sub-stub

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Aegean region geography stubs isn't too big, but I'd like to propose a sub-stub:

Actually, I just took a look at the number of transclusions for that redirect, and it looks like the category should be speedily created - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 21:46, 21 September 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Afyonkarahisar Province geography sub-stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Afyonkarahisar Province geography stubs is pretty beefy; I propose splitting it up into subtemplates/subcategories when needed:

- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 21:01, 21 September 2025 (UTC)

I can't see anything wrong with these. Waacstats (talk) 19:55, 22 September 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Scythrididae sub-stub

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
The following will be a subcategory of Scythrididae stubs and Scythris:

I have no issues with this one. Waacstats (talk) 20:02, 22 September 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Xyloryctidae sub-stub

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
The following will be a subcategory of Xyloryctidae stubs and Cryptophasa:

Support No issues with this one either. Waacstats (talk) 20:04, 22 September 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Coleophoridae sub-stub

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Coleophoridae stubs is a beefy category, because 99% of the articles are coleophora. I propose making {{Coleophora-stub}} (Coleophora stubs) for 1,374 articles - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 18:56, 17 September 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

River sub-stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
All of these will be subcategories of their respective "[Country] river stubs" and "[Division] geography stubs" parent categories:

Russia

[edit source]

India

[edit source]
Although I support these, just a warning, I think the Indian counts might be inflated as there are a number of categories that fall onto one or both of these that arent exclusive, for example, Category:Rivers of the Western Ghats falls into both of these categories and a number of others, Category:Tributaries of the Narmada River is in the MAharashtra and Madhya Pradesh. Also there may be some undercounts as articles have {{Maharashtra-geo-stub}} or one of its subcats. I suggest the old mantra, templates first, categories of they prove to be over 60, just be careful. Waacstats (talk) 21:11, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Lebanon geography sub-stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create as revised.
Lebanon geography stubs is getting pretty beefy; I propose the following subcats/temps:

I think the template for the last one should be written out in full as {{MountLebanonGovernate-geo-stub}} but otherwise I see no issues with these. Waacstats (talk) 20:56, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

15th-century English MP stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
We have split most of the other English MP by century categories by parliament now, only this and the 18th century(7 years) remain. This one is getting large so I propose following the precedent and splitting by parliament. There are a large number of these, nearly enough to have a stub category for the templates, but most categories contain fewer than 60 articles so yes there will be a large overlap but hopefully not too bad. I have proposed all the categories and templates, just incase someone wants to make the missing articles in the mean time.

Waacstats (talk) 17:06, 12 September 2025 (UTC)

Support - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:09, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
I'm going to create these. Please keep in mind that I'm not at home right now - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 13:47, 23 September 2025 (UTC)
They've been created. You can request small categories to be deleted once everything is sorted out - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 06:54, 25 September 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Australia politician stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
One that keeps creeping up. We have already split out the mayors and diplomats, we have then split out by party and then split one of those parties by where they sit (each state/senate/representative). I can find no party that would pass the 60 mark however I propose we split by state parliment that people sat in, a number of these would already have sub categories as we have split the Labor party politicians. ACT is likely to be too small for a category, the others should easily pass 60

Waacstats (talk) 17:06, 12 September 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Polish Sejm member stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Another one in the 700 range that could do with a trim and this one is only 6 months old. I'm fairly sure we will end up with some multi-stubbing as we do when we split the English mps but by Sejm looks the best way to go. Yes the 1989 Sejm is called the Contract Sejm in both the article and category so I have followed suit, a good encyclopedia will give further information if you wish to read up on the reasoning:

Waacstats (talk) 17:06, 12 September 2025 (UTC)

Support looks good to me :D - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 03:19, 26 September 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Speedies

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
A few for this week,

Waacstats (talk) 17:06, 12 September 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of Great Britain MP (1707–1800) for England stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
We have recently been splitting these categories by parliment, thought it best to follow suit but not really happy with how the names came out, anyone any better ideas. Anyhow the templates and categories would be as follows, given large overlap we should be able to create all the categogries but just in case categories iff the templates reach 60:

Support - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:11, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Wait! You misspelled "Britain" in the categories! - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:11, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
I fixed it nvm - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:03, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Thanks for that, can't even spell my home country's name right. God help me. Waacstats (talk) 21:15, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
I didn't know you were British! I guess I learn something new every day :D - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 22:03, 21 September 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of South Australia geography stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Similar to Asturias below, we could go with LGA's but I feel there are too many of them and none will reach 60 so I propose the LGA regions, unfortunatly we do not have permcats for these so a hand sort will be needed but I always was a glutton for punishment:

Waacstats (talk) 17:06, 12 September 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of Aasturias geogrpahy stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
This one is closing in on 700 articles, We have a choice of by Comarca or by municipality. It doesn't look like any individual municipality will get over 60 so I propose it would be more sensible to split by Comarca. I did think of using upmerged by munucipality templates as this information is more often included in articles but at 79, it felt like doing a US state split again and I'm not ready for that:

Waacstats (talk) 17:06, 12 September 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Cycling race stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Over 600 articles, we have already split out some countries and even specific races, I am unable to find any more caountries to split out and therefore propose the following to take caere of any races IN Europe as opposed to just European championships:

Waacstats (talk) 17:06, 12 September 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of Prešov Region geography stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Starting to get large at 650, we have a nice by district split that we can use and I therefore propose the following templates, with categories for those that pass the 60 mark:

Waacstats (talk) 17:06, 12 September 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Sport of athletics stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Not big enough to need a split but could be tidied up by the following category:

Waacstats (talk) 13:48, 8 September 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Urmia_County_geography_stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Oversized, per other Iranian counties I propose splitting by district as follows

This will all require a handsort, but from a quick look most articles have the Bakhsh or District listed, as usual templates first then category. Waacstats (talk) 13:48, 8 September 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Speedy

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
New finds this month:

Waacstats (talk) 13:48, 8 September 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

American physicist stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
This is another new one to the over 600 list that may be my fault that it grew. I did think that splitting by dob might be the best but as we split the biologists and chemists by areas of interest I propose the same here:

Waacstats (talk) 13:48, 8 September 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Cassidinae stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Another new one heading for the oversized category (773). Looking at the category the following is viable but as no permcats exist I can't give a realible petscan search:

Waacstats (talk) 13:48, 8 September 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Galerucinae stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
New one in the oversized category (1015 articles). It looks like following would bring it down to the 700 region:

Waacstats (talk) 13:48, 8 September 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Northern Ontario geography stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Over 600 articles and deserving of a trim the following appears to be sensible

Not all of these will pass 60 so as usual templates first categories for those that make 60. Waacstats (talk) 13:48, 8 September 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Cologne S-Bahn stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was do not create.
Rhine-Ruhr S-Bahn stubs should be split to match the split of the parent article (Rhine-Ruhr S-Bahn) to Cologne S-Bahn.

In the alternative, station articles served by the Cologne S-Bahn and not the Rhine-Ruhr S-Bahn could be upmerged into North Rhine-Westphalia railway station stubs. Mackensen (talk) 01:39, 8 September 2025 (UTC)

It doesnt look like there are enough articles for a category, I was going tosuggust we create the template and use that to upmerge to both categories, but I suppose there is no guarentee that all the articles to do with Cologne S-Bahn are stations (different lines, the trains people involved etc). Maybe for now we just put both templates on any that need them. Waacstats (talk) 17:10, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
Yes, Cologne S-Bahn stubs would only be a subset of North Rhine-Westphalia railway station stubs; I'm fairly certain it doesn't cross into another state. I'll just re-categorize as appropriate. Mackensen (talk) 20:05, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
May I suggest that, since Cologne is a location, we should capitalize the template: {{Cologne-sbahn-stub}}? Also, should "SBahn" also be capitalized in the template? Her Pegship (?) 19:54, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

20th-century painting stubs split

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
20th-century painting stubs should be split up by decade, like its predecessors.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

1930s comedy film sub-stub

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I propose making 1930s American comedy film stubs ({{1930s-US-comedy-film-stub}}), which will be a subcategory of 1930s comedy film stubs, American comedy film stubs, and 1930s comedy film stubs. 394 articles are waiting for the new template - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 15:28, 5 September 2025 (UTC)

  • I'm a bit surprised that there arent more waiting, I assumed the majority would have been US. Any ways support. Waacstats (talk) 07:18, 11 September 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Retrieved from "http://70.231.62.181/index.php?title=MyWiki:WikiProject_Stub_sorting/Proposals/2025/September&oldid=25050580"