MyWiki:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/2025/October

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Proposals, October 2025

[edit source]

Speedy

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Just the onetwo this week

Waacstats (talk) 18:07, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Yes check.svg Done - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 18:48, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Negro league baseball outfielder stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I have just pushed this one over 500 by sorting out its parent, we could do with culling it by decade of birth, just like the pitchers anad infielders, for example:

template for each decade that we have articles and categories for those that pass the 60 mark. Waacstats (talk) 18:07, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Support all of the proposals :D - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 20:20, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Polish actor stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Over 500, could do with a cull, propose following precedent with the following:

TV and voice actors are showing as short of the 60 but propose categories for iff they reach 60 when sorted. Waacstats (talk) 18:07, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Agapanthiini stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Category is over 700 articles I propose following the permcats and splitting as follows:

Waacstats (talk) 18:07, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Various US politician splits

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
A number of US states have politician cateogries that have passed the 500 mark, I propose we split these by members of the states senate and house.

Waacstats (talk) 18:07, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of North Dakota

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.

All the counties have templates, I propose the following breakdown based on this image
File:North Dakota Wikivoyage Map.png
Regions of North Dakota

Waacstats (talk) 18:07, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Support ravioli, ravioli, please make the categories! :D - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 00:53, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of South Dakota

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.

All the counties have templates, I propose the following split based on this image
File:South Dakota East River West River.png
Regions of South Dakota

Waacstats (talk) 18:07, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of Oklahoma

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.

All the counties have templates, I propose the following split based on this image
File:Oklahoma Static Map.png
Regions of South Dakota

Waacstats (talk) 18:07, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of New Mexico

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.

All the counties have templates, I propose the following split based on this image
File:New Mexico Regions.png
Regions of South Dakota

Waacstats (talk) 18:07, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Kentucky geography stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Category already has some splits I propose the following based on the fact that we still have 700 articles in the main category

Waacstats (talk) 18:07, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Trechinae sub-stub

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I propose the following split for Trechinae stubs:

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

More Tephritinae sub-stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Propose splitting up Tephritinae stubs accordingly:

Support Anouther one that is definitly needed and looks good. Waacstats (talk) 21:36, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
I also plan on making Myopitini stubs ({{Myopitini-stub}}), which will have Urophora stubs, among other articles - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 00:56, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Cassidinae sub-stubs, part 2

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Cassidinae stubs is still pretty beefy; I propose the following splits:

Support This looks good and defintly needed. Waacstats (talk) 21:36, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Negro league baseball infielder stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Another one closing in on 600 culling it by decade of birth for example:

template for each decade that we have articles and categories for those that pass the 60 mark Waacstats (talk) 16:07, 19 October 2025 (UTC)

Support as per usual :D - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:54, 20 October 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Japanese baseball pitcher stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Another one over 500 culling it by decade of birth for example:

template for each decade that we have articles and categories for those that pass the 60 mark Waacstats (talk) 16:07, 19 October 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Dutch football biography stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
A football biography category which we have already split by position, however a couple of these have gotten a bit sizeable and could do with a further split, following multiple precedents by decade of birth, for example:

template for each decade that we have articles and categories for those that pass the 60 mark Waacstats (talk) 16:07, 19 October 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

American golf tournament stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
OVer 500 and could do with a cull,

Waacstats (talk) 16:07, 19 October 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Kabaddi players

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
We have over 100 stub articles relating to kabaddi players, I therefore propose the following:

Waacstats (talk) 16:07, 19 October 2025 (UTC)

Support ravioli ravioli, bring on the categories :D - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:00, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Speedy

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
This weeks speediable finds

Waacstats (talk) 16:07, 19 October 2025 (UTC)

Support getting on it right now - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:30, 20 October 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Tephritinae sub-stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Tephritinae stubs is looking pretty big; I propose the following splits:

Support a good one to reduce at 1400 articles total. Waacstats (talk) 16:11, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Central Bosnia Canton geography sub-stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Central Bosnia Canton geography stubs is pretty big; I propose the following split:

Support No issues here, again might be an idea to have all the municipalities.Waacstats (talk) 16:09, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Zenica-Doboj Canton geography sub-stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Zenica-Doboj Canton geography stubs is pretty beefy; I propose the following splits:

Support is it worth doing templates for the other municipalites? Waacstats (talk) 16:10, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Ardabil province geography sub-stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Ardabil province geography stubs deserves some extra splits:

Looks good, can i suggest we add temmplates for the Counties that dont make 60. Waacstats (talk) 16:08, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of Louisiana geography stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.

We have split Louisiana by parish templates but no PArish was big enough for its own category therefore I suggest we split by region based on this image
File:Map of regions of Louisiana.svg
Regions of Louisiana

{{BienvilleParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{BossierParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{CaddoParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{CaldwellParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{ClaiborneParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{DeSotoParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{EastCarrollParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{FranklinParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{JacksonParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{LincolnParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{MadisonParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{MorehouseParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{OuachitaParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{RedRiverParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{RichlandParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{TensasParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{UnionParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{WebsterParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{WestCarrollParishLA-geo-stub}} and {{WinnParishLA-geo-stub}}

{{AllenParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{BeauregardParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{CatahoulaParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{ConcordiaParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{GrantParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{LaSalleParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{NatchitochesParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{RapidesParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{SabineParishLA-geo-stub}} and {{VernonParishLA-geo-stub}}

{{AcadiaParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{AscensionParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{AssumptionParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{AvoyellesParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{CalcasieuParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{CameronParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{EvangelineParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{IberiaParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{IbervilleParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{JeffersonDavisParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{LafayetteParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{LafourcheParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{PointeCoupeeParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{StCharlesParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{StJamesParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{StJohntheBaptistParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{StLandryParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{StMartinParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{StMaryParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{TerrebonneParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{VermilionParishLA-geo-stub}} and {{WestBatonRougeParishLA-geo-stub}}

{{EastBatonRougeParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{EastFelicianaParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{LivingstonParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{StHelenaParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{StTammanyParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{TangipahoaParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{WashingtonParishLA-geo-stub}} and {{WestFelicianaParishLA-geo-stub}}

{{JeffersonParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{OrleansParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{PlaqueminesParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{StBernardParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{StCharlesParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{StJamesParishLA-geo-stub}} and {{StJohntheBaptistParishLA-geo-stub}} Waacstats (talk) 07:24, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Telecommunication stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
About to break 700 I propose we split out the following categories:

Waacstats (talk) 07:24, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Phytoseiidae stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Another one getting large with two possible splits:

Waacstats (talk) 07:24, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Liberal Party of Australia politician stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Category is ready to break into the 600 club, I propose the following splilt:

Waacstats (talk) 07:24, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Australia television show stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Starting to creep up, I propose the following two splits per other countries that we have split:

Waacstats (talk) 07:24, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Australia athletics biographies

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
We have another athletics category break the 600 mark, propose we split this like we have with other countries, by event:

Waacstats (talk) 07:24, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Oklahoma and the Dakotas

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Following on from last month, all three states are starting to get large. I would like to propose splitting these with by county templates, categories for any that make 60 and then we can more clearly see what we have regarding regional categories. Templates and categories of the following formats for each county:

Waacstats (talk) 07:24, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

Support - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 03:09, 20 October 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Cicindelidae stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Over 600 articles, can easily be split by the following two categories:

Waacstats (talk) 07:24, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

speedy

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
A few speedies for this week:

Waacstats (talk) 07:24, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Compact object stub

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Compact object stubs ({{compact-object-stub}}) For neutron stars and black holes. Found 76 applicable articles via category search. Shocksingularity (talk) 05:49, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

Presumably the parent cat would be Category:Compact stars? Her Pegship (?) 19:28, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
Yeah, plus possibly some intermediate-mass/supermassive BHs Shocksingularity (talk) 21:11, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Hymenobacter stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I propose making Hymenobacter stubs ({{Hymenobacter-stub}}) for over 60 articles in Cytophagia stubs - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:23, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

Support looks good to me Waacstats (talk) 21:51, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Myrmicinae sub-stub

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Myrmicinae stubs is pretty big; I propose the following split:

Support looks good to me Waacstats (talk) 21:51, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Potter wasp sub-stub

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Potter wasp stubs is pretty big; I propose the following sub-stub:

Support looks good to me Waacstats (talk) 21:51, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Cicindelidae sub-stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Cicindelidae stubs is pretty big; I propose the following splits:

Support looks good to me Waacstats (talk) 21:51, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Lebiinae sub-stub

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Lebiinae stubs is pretty beefy; I propose the following split:

Support looks good to me Waacstats (talk) 21:51, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Trechinae sub-stub

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Trechinae stubs is pretty beefy, and not in the good way. I propose the following split:

Support looks good to me Waacstats (talk) 21:51, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Platyninae sub-stub

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Platyninae stubs is pretty big; I propose the following split:

Support looks good to me Waacstats (talk) 21:51, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Staphyliniformia stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
This category/template, Staphyliniformia stubs ({{Staphyliniformia-stub}}) will contain Staphylinoidea stubs and 353 pages - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 23:10, 4 October 2025 (UTC)

Support looks good to me Waacstats (talk) 21:51, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Bostrichoidea sub-stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Bostrichoidea stubs is a little big; I propose the following splits:

Support looks good to me Waacstats (talk) 21:51, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Elaphidiini sub-stub

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Elaphidiini stubs is pretty big; I propose the following:

Support looks good to me Waacstats (talk) 21:51, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Saperdini sub-stub

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Saperdini stubs is pretty beefy. I propose the following subcats/temps:

Support looks good to me Waacstats (talk) 21:51, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Onciderini sub-stub

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Onciderini stubs is pretty big. I propose:

Support looks good to me Waacstats (talk) 21:51, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Mesosini sub-stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Mesosini stubs is pretty beefy, and not in the good way. I propose:

Support looks good to me Waacstats (talk) 21:51, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Agapanthiini sub-stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Agapanthiini stubs is getting really big; I propose the following splits:

Support looks good to me Waacstats (talk) 21:51, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Barisal Division geography sub-stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Barisal Division geography stubs is pretty beefy; I propose the following subcats/temps:

Support looks good to me Waacstats (talk) 21:51, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Retrieved from "http://70.231.62.181/index.php?title=MyWiki:WikiProject_Stub_sorting/Proposals/2025/October&oldid=25142254"