MyWiki:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/2025/November

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Proposals, November 2025

[edit source]

Ammonite sub-stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Ammonite stubs is huge. I propose the following splits:

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Speedy

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Just the one

Waacstats (talk) 19:28, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Isopod stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Another category closer to 600 than 500. I propose th following splits based on perm cats:

Waacstats (talk) 19:28, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

UK MP for England stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
CAtegory is getting large at over 500 articles. We already have three sub categories for different parties, I'd like to propose a former party category in the following:

Waacstats (talk) 19:28, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

American computer scientist stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
American scientist is over 500 and computer scientist is getting bigger. Looking at articles in the permenant category that have either category we have over 170 articles therefore I propose:

While we are at it, the same search shows that there are 79 articles that could take the following:

Waacstats (talk) 19:28, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

London stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
A fast growing category, has pushed through the 600 barrier. It has a lot of local council wards in there. I propose splitting these off:

Waacstats (talk) 19:28, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Pieridae stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Closing in on 600 stubs, I proposewe split by the nest level per the perm cats:

Waacstats (talk) 19:28, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

I have another split to propose:
There's also the possibility of Pierini stubs within the category I proposed - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 09:24, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
Don't know how i missed that one but great catch. Waacstats (talk) 21:06, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
For the Pierini stubs, 261 - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:16, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Italian train station stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I think we need to ignore my proposal from earlier this month regarding this category, I forgot that metro stations go in the rapid transit categories not the train station categories. Therefore I have removed the metro stations from the Italian train station categories and then propose the following speediable category

Waacstats (talk) 19:28, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

I'll create the category in the morning - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 05:42, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

South Korea mountain stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I propose {{SouthKorea-mountain-stub}}, South Korea mountain stubs; 307 - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 04:46, 29 November 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Chinese athletics biographies

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
We have four athletics category break the 500 mark, propose we split these like we have with other countries, by event:

Waacstats (talk) 21:51, 23 November 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Sri Lankan cricket biography, 1990s birth stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Over 500 I propose we split by yob following this pattern

Waacstats (talk) 21:51, 23 November 2025 (UTC)

Support, but please change 1990 to 1990s in the proposal - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 22:30, 24 November 2025 (UTC)
This is for the a by year split so 1990, 1991, 1992 etc rather than the 1990s decade which we already have. sorry for the confusion. Waacstats (talk) 18:47, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
Oh! In that case, go for it! :D - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 19:00, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

French castle stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Starting to get big, we have already split out Grand Est so I propose we continue with the other regions.

names are taken from the geo categories. Catgeories only for those that pass 60. Waacstats (talk) 21:51, 23 November 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Andalusia geography stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Category over 500 and we have already started breaking this down by province, I propose we finish this off with the following:

Obviously cateogries only for those that make it to 60 Waacstats (talk) 21:51, 23 November 2025 (UTC)

Support ravioli, ravioli, bring on the categories :D - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 19:01, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Canadian geologic formation stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Over 500 and could do with a split by province/territory, I therefore propose the following:

Obviously cateogries only for those that make it to 60. Waacstats (talk) 21:51, 23 November 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Białystok_County_geography_stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Category is over 500 I propose splitting by Gmina,

Obviously categories only for those that reach 60.Waacstats (talk) 21:51, 23 November 2025 (UTC)

Support - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 12:09, 30 November 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Asian dessert stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I propose splitting Dessert stubs:

- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 12:24, 19 November 2025 (UTC)

looks good to me. Waacstats (talk) 20:49, 24 November 2025 (UTC)
As a parent-only cat, I don't think Category:Asian dessert stubs needs a template, unless you want to remove the parent-only status? Her Pegship (?) 20:04, 26 November 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Orchidoideae sub-stub

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Orchidoideae stubs is big; I propose the following split:

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

1920s American silent drama film stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I'm taking a break from creating new stubs for the time being, but I'll still be here to propose any new ideas. Anyway, 1920s silent drama film stubs is pretty big; I propose the following split:

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Labour MP for England stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Starting to get large,, suggest they follow the conservative party and be split by decade of birth:

Waacstats (talk) 19:13, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

American historian stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
This one is definitely oversized (over 1000) and has braved attempts previously to split by area of interest. I prospose splitting this by decade of birth:

Waacstats (talk) 19:13, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

Support, but your split uses {{US-photographer-stub}} instead of {{US-historian-stub}}:
If we're really going to do this, then the "areas of interest" categories should be upmerged to fit the proposal - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 18:54, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
More:
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

American photographers

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Definitely getting large, I believe best way to cull this might be by decade of birth. I did think of artistic v journalistic but that seems not to work to well.

Waacstats (talk) 19:13, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

American economists

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Started to get large propose a by century split as birth year isn't always included and I cant find a decade that takes 60.

Waacstats (talk) 19:13, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

Support as long as the stub template uses -20C- rather than -20thC-. Her Pegship (?) 22:30, 23 November 2025 (UTC)
Un-closing, as the note said "create as revised"; the template should be {{US-economist-20C-stub}}, as previously established in other templates, without the "th". Please re-create as revised. Her Pegship (?) 18:30, 25 November 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Indonesia stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Over 500 and in need of a good sort, though the following categories will help with this:

I know we dont normally split languages by nation but given the fact that we have over 80 articles here I think this is a viable category. Waacstats (talk) 19:13, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Ghana stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
A quick sort has brought this down, it could easily be taken much lower by splitting out the local festivals

Waacstats (talk) 19:13, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

French nobility stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create as revised.
Closing in on the 600 mark I propose the following:

Waacstats (talk) 19:13, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

Should the templates be -count- and -duke- without the caps? Her Pegship (?) 22:42, 23 November 2025 (UTC)
Yes. Good catch, thankyou. Waacstats (talk) 18:26, 25 November 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

United States naval ship stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create as revised.
Starting to get large, I propose culling this with the following:

not the sexiest of ship types but we don't appear to have enough of any of the more sexy ships. Waacstats (talk) 19:13, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

I propose we use "tugboat" instead of "tug" (less vernacular), i.e. United States Navy tugboat stubs {{US-navy-tugboat-stub}}. There aren't any other tugboat stub types, so this would set an example for any to come. Her Pegship (?) 20:51, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Yes that does sound better, dont know why i suggested "tug". I will amend now.Waacstats (talk) 18:28, 25 November 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Italian railway station stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Starting to get large, we have a number of stations here that are actually for metro stations as opposed to train stations (some of the rail enthusiasts can be quite specific about this). I propose we split out the Rome and Milan metros as they appear to have enough articles.

Waacstats (talk) 19:13, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

German painter stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Another category that could do with a cull. I suggest the following

Categories for those that reach 60 - the first three only unless theres some hiding. Waacstats (talk) 19:13, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

Support ravioli ravioli, bring on the categories :D - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 18:40, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Support but I think all the other -century- stubs are formed as {{Fooian-19C-stub}} without the "th". Her Pegship (?) 22:29, 23 November 2025 (UTC)
I based this off templates on the {{Italy-painter-20thC-stub}}. We seem to have a mix of both "20thC" and "20C". Waacstats (talk) 18:34, 26 November 2025 (UTC)
OK then... never mind :) Her Pegship (?) 19:50, 26 November 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Australian rules football stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Another over 500 that could do with a cull

Waacstats (talk) 19:13, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Estonian counties

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Two Counties are over the 500 mark and could do with a cull. I propose the following

The rural municipalities are called "Parish" while the urban municipalities are not. Also the categorisation by municipality is not great. Waacstats (talk) 19:13, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

Support, but I had to modify some of the templates so we don't end up creating extra - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 18:41, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Speedies

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
following are ready for categories:

Waacstats (talk) 19:13, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

 Done - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 18:43, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

College basketball season stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Category is nearing 600 and could do with a split, I propose following the college football and splitting by decade:

Waacstats (talk) 19:13, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Election stub categories

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Looking through some of the larger grandchild categories of Category:United States election stubs, I see that: Category:Vermont election stubs has 152 pages, of which 91 are about gubernatorial elections (using my browser's find function); Category:Connecticut election stubs has 173 pages, of which 88 are about gubernatorial elections (using my browser's find function); and Category:Texas election stubs has 165 pages, of which 97 are about Texas House of Representatives districts (using my browser's find function).

Looking beyond just the United States: there are 203 pages that would fit into a hypothetical Category:London elections stubs, of which 104 pages would fit into a hypothetical Category:London Borough council election stubs; 125 out of 166 pages in Category:Japanese election stubs are gubernatorial elections (using my browser's find function); at least[nb 1] 103 out of 172 pages in Category:Malaysian election stubs are state constituency pages (using my browser's find function); there are 185 pages that would fit into a hypothetical Category:European Parliament election stubs; there are 88 pages that would fit into a hypothetical Category:Nigerian election stubs; there are 96 pages that would fit into a hypothetical East Midlands election stubs; there are 295 pages that would fit into a hypothetical East of England election stubs; there are 134 pages that would fit into a hypothetical North West English election stubs; there are 178 pages that would fit into a hypothetical South East England election stubs; there are 121 pages that would fit into a hypothetical South West England election stubs; there are 121 pages that would fit into a hypothetical West Midlands (region) election stubs; there are 78 pages that would fit into a hypothetical Yorkshire and the Humber election stubs; and there are 715 pages that would fit into a hypothetical Category:England by-election stubs, of which 78 pages would fit into a hypothetical Category:East of England by-election stubs, 106 pages would fit into a hypothetical Category:North West England by-election stubs, 129 pages would fit into a hypothetical Category:South East England by-election stubs, 101 pages would fit into a hypothetical Category:South West England by-election stubs, and 81 pages would fit into a hypothetical Category:West Midlands (region) by-election stubs.

To summarize, here is a list of stub categories that I am proposing creating (with subcategories of multiple proposed categories repeated), along with the number of pages that would fit into each:

Care to differ or discuss with me? The Nth User 04:48, 15 November 2025 (UTC)

Support looks good to me - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 05:02, 15 November 2025 (UTC)

Actually, I just thought of some more.

Care to differ or discuss with me? The Nth User 05:31, 15 November 2025 (UTC)

Support looks like a really comprehensive improvement. Waacstats (talk) 19:17, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Not a reply to the proposal, but a suggestion: the reference note "nb-1" you use doesn't appear except in "edit" mode (see here; if you want folks to see it, perhaps you should reformat it without using the nb code. Her Pegship (?) 01:36, 19 November 2025 (UTC)
I actually just added the template to the bottom of this section so it wouldn't disrupt the flow. Care to differ or discuss with me? The Nth User 16:12, 19 November 2025 (UTC)
Comment I'm guessing that there is probably a bot that would make the process of updating stub templates easier, but I don't know what its name is. I thought of looking through the edit history of pages that have been put into stub categories recently approved here, but looking at a page transcluding the recently-created Template:1930s-UK-drama-film-stub yielded a non-bot edit, looking at a page transcluding the recently-created Template:1950s-musical-film-stub yielded a non-bot edit, and looking at a page transcluding the recently-created Template:Pennsylvania-PARepresentative-Democratic-stub yielded a non-bot edit, so maybe there isn't a bot for this, but this still feels like something that a bot would have been created for, and the existence of PetScan indicates that using a bot would be possible. Could someone please tell me if there is a bot for this? I would obviously prefer to not edit stub templates on over 1,500 pages manually if I don't have to. Care to differ or discuss with me? The Nth User 16:12, 19 November 2025 (UTC)
  1. ^ Not all state constituency pages have state constituency in the title, but PetScan doesn't work here because there is no category containing Malaysia state constituencies but not Malaysia federal constituencies.
Comment: closing as "create" with recommendation that the bot question be posed on the project talk page. Her Pegship (?) 22:42, 23 November 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Mongolian politician stub

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was do not create.
Proposal to create Mongolian politician stubs, {{Mongolian-politician-stubs}}, every other east asian countries have their own stubs. East Asian politician stubs have a lot of uncategorized pages of Mongolian politicians. - Egzs (talk) 05:50, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

Support, but we already have {{Mongolia-politician-stub}} - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 14:08, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
As Opal says, we already have the template, we normally wait till we have 60 articles to go with a category. Waacstats (talk) 16:50, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Yeah, a lot of the Mongolian politician articles are not categorized because of no specific category. I can raise the amount, if its okay Egzs (talk) 17:15, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
FYI, currently 25 articles use this template. Her Pegship (?) 19:07, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Crossotini sub-stub

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I propose making Frea (beetle) stubs, {{Frea-stub}} - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 18:02, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

Support looks good. Waacstats (talk) 16:56, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Columbellidae sub-stub

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I propose the following split for Columbellidae stubs:

Support looks good. Waacstats (talk) 16:55, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Camaenidae sub-stub

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Split for Camaenidae stubs:

Support looks good. Waacstats (talk) 16:55, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Ziguinchor region geography stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Senegal geography stubs is pretty big; I propose the following split:

Support looks good, might be worthwhile having templates for the other regions. Waacstats (talk) 16:54, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Irish Conservative Party MP stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.

Support looks like a good start, I was planning at looking at myself. Waacstats (talk) 16:53, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Tetraserica stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Melolonthinae stubs is pretty beefy; I propose the following split:

Support looks good to me. Waacstats (talk) 16:51, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This weeks speedies

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
The list for this week

Waacstats (talk) 18:04, 9 November 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Film stubs breakdown

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Following on from last weeks theme, there are two more film categories that are closing in on 600 articles and I would like to breakdown in the following ways:

templates for any decade we have articles for and categories for any templates that have 60 articles Waacstats (talk) 18:04, 9 November 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Hungarian footy players

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
The hungarian midfielders have surpassed 500 articles and so I would like to split this by decade of birth as per numerous precedent and while we are at it to do the same with the defenders and forwards which we have done elsewhere.

obviously templates for each year and categories for those years that pass 60. Waacstats (talk) 18:04, 9 November 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of some footy cats

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Some of the football categories are creeping over 500 or 600 articles, I'd like to cull these back a bit unfortunatly we have already split by position and decade of birth of birth. Following the example set in the Russian categories I will propose the following splits:

obviously templates for each year and categories for those years that pass 60. Waacstats (talk) 18:04, 9 November 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Aussie rules footballers

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Sticking with the theme from above, a couple of Australian rules football by decade categories are starting to get to the point of needing a split. I propose the same thing here:

obviously templates for each year and categories for those years that pass 60. Waacstats (talk) 18:04, 9 November 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Olympic medalists

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Three countries have more than 500 articles in there Olympic medalist categories. I would like to prune these back with the following:

Waacstats (talk) 18:04, 9 November 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Rissoidae stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Category is over 600, we can cull this back with the following:

Waacstats (talk) 18:04, 9 November 2025 (UTC)

Support; gets them off the list :D - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 18:50, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Polyommatini stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Category is over 600, we can cull this back with the following:

Waacstats (talk) 18:04, 9 November 2025 (UTC)

Support :D - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 19:58, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

More Cassidinae sub-stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
More splits for Cassidinae stubs:

After this is created, I plan on notifying Categories for Discussion to upmerge Oediopalpa stubs - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:12, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Looks good to me Waacstats (talk) 19:36, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Terelliini stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I propose the following sub-stubs of Tephritinae stubs:

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This weeks speedies

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
This weeks list

Waacstats (talk) 10:09, 3 November 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of 1910s drama films

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create as revised.
Not sure about this one but given the fact that there are over 1000 articles here. the following would take over 400 articles:

Waacstats (talk) 10:09, 3 November 2025 (UTC)

Support, but I think it would be "1910s lost", not "Lost 1910s", though I could be wrong... - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 17:34, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Good catch, that fits in better with the existing perm cats, I'll change this to
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of 1960s Italian film stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Category over 500, could do with a cull I propose the following:

Waacstats (talk) 10:09, 3 November 2025 (UTC)

Support go for it :D - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 17:34, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of 1970s Italian film stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Category over 500, could do with a cull I propose the following:

Waacstats (talk) 10:09, 3 November 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of 1920s British film stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Category over 500, could do with a cull I propose the following:

Waacstats (talk) 10:09, 3 November 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of 1930s British film stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Category over 500, could do with a cull I propose the following:

Waacstats (talk) 10:09, 3 November 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of 1930s French Film stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Over 600 articles I propose the following split, that should halve the category:

Waacstats (talk) 10:09, 3 November 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of Musical film stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Over 500 articles I propose the following split by decade:

Waacstats (talk) 10:09, 3 November 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of Musical comedy film stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Over 500 articles I propose the following split by decade, and subcat to the above:

Waacstats (talk) 10:09, 3 November 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

US state house politicians

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
A couple of US states have already had there politician stub categories split out members of the state senate and state house, 4 of these are now over 500, i propose following Wisconsin's example and splitting by party:

Waacstats (talk) 10:09, 3 November 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Democratic party member of the Wisconsin State Assembly stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Having mentioned the Wisonsin State Assembly above, the Demoocrats could do with a cull, following their Republican colleagues I propose a by decade of birth split such as:

templates for all decades we have articles with categories for those that reach 60. Waacstats (talk) 10:09, 3 November 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Retrieved from "http://70.231.62.181/index.php?title=MyWiki:WikiProject_Stub_sorting/Proposals/2025/November&oldid=25234734"