MyWiki:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/2025/December

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Proposals, December 2025

[edit source]

Please check how many articles qualify for a stub type before proposing it.

NEW PROPOSALS

[edit source]
Note to stub creators:
When creating stub types, please list them on the stub type list.

Scopariinae stubs

[edit source]

And again

Waacstats (talk) 20:10, 21 December 2025 (UTC)

Erebinae stubs

[edit source]

Rinse and repeat from below:

Waacstats (talk) 20:10, 21 December 2025 (UTC)

Fasciolariidae stubs

[edit source]

And another over 500:

Waacstats (talk) 20:10, 21 December 2025 (UTC)

Sesiidae stubs

[edit source]

Another 500+ categroy with the following being viable:

Waacstats (talk) 20:10, 21 December 2025 (UTC)

Brassicales stubs

[edit source]

Over 500 and the following are viable:

Waacstats (talk) 20:10, 21 December 2025 (UTC)

Ericaceae stubs

[edit source]

This ones over 500 with the following being viable

Waacstats (talk) 20:10, 21 December 2025 (UTC)

Betaproteobacteria stubs

[edit source]

Yet another one with the following being viable:

Waacstats (talk) 20:10, 21 December 2025 (UTC)

Myrtaceae stubs

[edit source]

Another over 600 with the following being viable:

Waacstats (talk) 20:10, 21 December 2025 (UTC)

Dipsadinae stubs

[edit source]

Over 600 articles and we have one subcat that could have over 60

Waacstats (talk) 20:10, 21 December 2025 (UTC)

Speedies

[edit source]

This weeks finds:

Waacstats (talk) 20:10, 21 December 2025 (UTC)

Swedish politician sub-stubs

[edit source]

Splits for Swedish politician stubs:

As always, please let me know if I should make any changes! :D - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 14:55, 21 December 2025 (UTC)

Sterrhinae sub-stubs

[edit source]

Sterrhinae stubs is pretty big; I propose the following splits:

The last one will contain Scopula stubs - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 05:32, 21 December 2025 (UTC)
  • I cant see any reason against this. Waacstats (talk) 20:14, 21 December 2025 (UTC)

Asthenini sub-stub, part 2

[edit source]

Asthenini stubs is pretty big; I propose the following split:

Geometrinae sub-stubs

[edit source]

Geometrinae stubs is pretty big; I propose the following splits:

Argentine politicians

[edit source]

Yet another politician category over 500, I propose splitting out the national legislators with the following:

Waacstats (talk) 19:53, 14 December 2025 (UTC)

Malaysia politicians

[edit source]

Another politician category over 500 that could do with a split. I found the following to be viable

it may be worth looking at the rest of the states after a good tidy up of the categories involved. Waacstats (talk) 19:53, 14 December 2025 (UTC)

Hungary politicians

[edit source]

Again over 500 articles I propose we split out the MPs/Members of the National Assembly.

Waacstats (talk) 19:53, 14 December 2025 (UTC)

Newfoundland and Labrador politicians

[edit source]

Over 500 articles, I propose the following split based on other provinces:

Waacstats (talk) 19:53, 14 December 2025 (UTC)

German politicians

[edit source]

Two categories have come across my interest recently that could do with reducing in size. I propose the following splits:

Waacstats (talk) 19:53, 14 December 2025 (UTC)

Speedy

[edit source]

This weeks finds;

Waacstats (talk) 19:53, 14 December 2025 (UTC)

Spanish building and structure sub-stubs

[edit source]

A subcategory for Spanish building and structure stubs and some templates:

I don't think it makes any difference to the count but you've included Barcelona (which should be in the Catalan category) instead of Cadiz in the list of templates. Assuming that it is still over 60 I have no issues with this. Waacstats (talk) 19:57, 14 December 2025 (UTC)

Asthenini sub-stub

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I propose the following split for Asthenini stubs:

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Satyrini sub-stub

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I propose the following split for Satyrini stubs:

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Speedy

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
These weeks list:

Waacstats (talk) 20:31, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Hesperiinae stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
A subcat of below, this one is also over 500 I propose a few new subcats to bring it down a bit:

Waacstats (talk) 20:31, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

Support I was just about to propose this :D - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 07:40, 11 December 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Hesperiidae stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Over 500 articles, I propose adding a few subcats:

Waacstats (talk) 20:31, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Poritiinae stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Over 700 articles, could do with a trim. I propose the following subcats based on the perm cats:

Waacstats (talk) 20:31, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

British swimming biography stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Category is over 500 and in need of a split. I therefore propose the following:

Categories for those that pass the 60 mark (England and Scotland according to petscan but lets see with hand sorting} Waacstats (talk) 20:31, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Melolonthinae stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
A third over the 1000 mark, the following appear viable but wont be enough to reduce it below 800

Waacstats (talk) 20:31, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

1920s silent drama film stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Another one over 1000. We recently split lost films out of the 1910s drama films I have no idea why i didn't propose the same here at that time but better later than never.

this will leave us with a 500+ category and a 700+ parent. Others I would like to propose a similar split for are:

May be more later Waacstats (talk) 20:31, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Araneomorphae stubs

[edit source]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Slightly oversized at over 1200 articles, the following appear viable, wont get it off the oversized list bt will get it closer:

Waacstats (talk) 20:31, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Retrieved from "http://70.231.62.181/index.php?title=MyWiki:WikiProject_Stub_sorting/Proposals/2025/December&oldid=25379620"