MyWiki:WikiProject Clans of Scotland/Assessment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Clans of Scotland/Tab header}}

This is the assessment page for the Clans of Scotland WikiProject. {{Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Clans of Scotland articles by quality statistics}}

Quality scale

[edit source]
WikiProject content quality grading scheme
Class Criteria Reader's experience Editing suggestions Example
 FA The article has attained featured article status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured article candidates.
More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured article criteria:{{Wikipedia:Featured article criteria}}
 Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information. No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. Cleopatra
(as of June 2018)
 FL The article has attained featured list status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured list candidates.
More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured list criteria:{{Wikipedia:Featured list criteria}}
 Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items. No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events
(as of May 2018)
 A The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class.
More detailed criteria
The article meets the A-Class criteria:
{{Wikipedia:Content assessment/A-Class criteria|raw=yes}}
 Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting. Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. WP:Peer review may help. Battle of Nam River
(as of June 2014)
 GA The article meets all of the good article criteria, and has been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from WP:Good article nominations.
More detailed criteria
{{Wikipedia:Good article criteria}}
 Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (though not necessarily equalling) the quality of a professional publication. Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing. Everybody Wants to Rule the World
(as of October 2025)
B The article meets all of the B-Class criteria. It is mostly complete and does not have major problems, but requires some further work to reach good article standards.
More detailed criteria
{{Wikipedia:Content assessment/B-Class criteria|raw=yes}}
 Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher. A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines. Psychology
(as of January 2024)
C The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup.
More detailed criteria
The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements, or need editing for clarity, balance, or flow.
 Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study. Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems. Wing
(as of June 2018)
Start An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources.
More detailed criteria
The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas. The article has one or more of the following:
  • A useful picture or graphic
  • Multiple links that help explain or illustrate the topic
  • A subheading that fully treats an element of the topic
  • Multiple subheadings that indicate material that could be added to complete the article
 Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more. Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Improve the grammar, spelling, and writing style; decrease the use of jargon. Gravel
(as of January 2006)
Stub A very basic description of the topic. Meets none of the Start-Class criteria. Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant. Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant. Lineage (anthropology)
(as of December 2014)
List Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list or set index article, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area. There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader. Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized. List of literary movements

Importance scale

[edit source]
Label Criteria
Top Articles describing the central, core and basic elements, culture and heritage of the Scottish clans, or subjects of top importance to pan-clan history
Examples: Scottish clans, Scottish chief, Tartan, Court of the Lord Lyon.
High Articles describing the major dominant chiefs or clans of Scotland, or subjects of significant importance to clans of Scotland
Examples: Clan Campbell, Clan Stuart, Clan Cameron, List of castles in Scotland, Scottish Tartans Authority, Coat of Arms.
Mid Articles describing the specialist and individual elements and heritage of the Scottish clans
Examples: Alasdair MacColla, Clan Muir, Battle of Mulroy.
Low Articles describing subjects of specialist and/or obscure interest
Examples: Rowallan Castle, Gabrán mac Domangairt


How to assess articles

[edit source]

To assess an article, add |class= and |importance= to the WikiProject banner on the article's talk page to get this:

{{WikiProject Clans of Scotland|class=|importance=}}

To assess the quality of the article, add either stub, start, B, GA, A, or FA after class=.

Example:
{{WikiProject Clans of Scotland|class=GA|importance=}}

To assess the importance of the article, add low, mid, high, or top after importance=.

Example:
{{WikiProject Clans of Scotland|class=GA|importance=high}}
The following is a list of parameters for different quality ratings and importance ratings
FA
A
GA
B
Start
Stub

The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article:

Top
High
Mid
Low
???

The following values may be used for importance assessments:

Log

[edit source]

{{Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Clans of Scotland articles by quality log}}

Retrieved from "http://70.231.62.181/index.php?title=MyWiki:WikiProject_Clans_of_Scotland/Assessment&oldid=420460"