MyWiki:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2017 April 22

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This template must be substituted. Replace {{Archive header with {{subst:Archive header.

{| width = "100%"

|- ! colspan="3" align="center" | Help desk |- ! width="20%" align="left" | < April 21 ! width="25%" align="center"|<< Mar | April | May >> ! width="20%" align="right" |Current help desk > |}

Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


April 22

[edit source]

Request on 17:41:23, 22 April 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by 24.46.97.28

[edit source]

as I submitted article for creation without reference will staff archive enrico j Madrid and article enrico j Madrid for reference

24.46.97.28 (talk) 17:41, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Reply - I see you have added several references. Before re-submitting for review, I would ensure you are complying with Wikipedia:Reliable sources as regards the references you select, and I would ensure that you better comply with the Wikipedia manual of style as regards the formatting of your draft. Isingness (talk) 23:42, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

23:20:40, 22 April 2017 review of submission by Wernien

[edit source]


Wernien (talk) 23:20, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

May I please as, why the review of my draft article takes that long? I don't want to complain, but could it be that the article has been overlooked or is still not good enough to be published. - Thnak you very much. And I apologise in advance, I do not write very much here. Wernien (talk) 23:30, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Reply - It has only been less than three weeks; with the backlog you may be waiting a while longer. Regardless, you may want to add third-party references to all parts of your text so that when it is reviewed it does not get rejected for poor sourcing. From what I can see, the JSTOR link is also dead, so you likely want to ensure all parts of your draft are functional to avoid other issues. Isingness (talk) 23:39, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Thanks - Thank you very much, I have repaired two links. I have also checked the references, To my understanding the sourcing should be OK. I am looking forward to the possibility that the article will be published.Wernien (talk) 16:28, 23 April 2017 (UTC)