MyWiki:Requested moves/Technical requests

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

{{Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests/Instructions}}

Technical requests

[edit source]

Uncontroversial technical requests

[edit source]

Looking at various sources, most of them don't call it "Powerful Owl". Some of them do say that it depicts a powerful owl, but that's different from saying that is the name of the statue. The statue seems to be referred to with a variety of names, but perhaps the most frequent and official one is simply Owl. See also the comments on the article's Talk page. MOS:ART/TITLE would suggest the title Owl (Armstrong). —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 20:56, 20 December 2025 (UTC)
Yeah "The Big Powerful Owl" seems a bit far-fetched from what the sources say. Support moving to Owl (Armstrong) per MOS:ART/TITLE. HurricaneZetaC 21:28, 20 December 2025 (UTC)

Requests to revert undiscussed moves

[edit source]


Contested technical requests

[edit source]

@[[User:TenghuiHadath}|TenghuiHadath}]] No, kingdom should be lowercase; see other pages in Category:Kingdoms of Sri Lanka, Category:Former kingdoms etc. It's only capitalized when its the first letter of the title. Vestrian24Bio 13:28, 16 December 2025 (UTC)
@TenghuiHadath - fixing ping. HurricaneZetaC 18:44, 16 December 2025 (UTC)
This isn’t the case for other kingdoms though, such as “Ryukyu Kingdom”, “Indo-Greek Kingdom” or “Bosporan Kingdom” (all of these are capital K)
This is inconsistent and should be rectified accordingly. The correct directions in which to rectify these errors is towards using a capital K for all of these kingdoms, because it’s firstly easier, and secondly actually grammatically correct. TenghuiHadath (talk) 05:10, 18 December 2025 (UTC)
@VDVSK waiting for sources before moving (note that while English-language sources are preferred, non-English are acceptable if that's all there is) ASUKITE 18:00, 17 December 2025 (UTC)
Hello @Asukite and @Tenshi Hinanawi. Doesn't COMMONNAME invite articles to have their most used name? Both the Russian and Turkish Wikis list the title as "Invincible and Legendary" but I also found some sources that refer to it by that title as its primary title:
  1. http://www.sovmusic.ru/english/download.php?fname=nesokr2
  2. http://a-pesni.org/ww2/oficial/nesokruch.htm
  3. https://www.marxists.org/history/ussr/sounds/lyrics/nesokrushimaia.htm
  4. https://mikessite.co.uk/soviet-and-russian-songs-this-one-is-called-indestructible-and-legendary
If you also Google it on YouTube then you'll get more results under IaL than SotSA. I believe IaL was the original title when the song was composed but it was changed after the renaming of the Red Army? I ain't too keen on the specifics so take that last sentence with some salt. VDVSK (talk) 22:09, 18 December 2025 (UTC)
@VDVSK it appears this request has been contested, so it would be best to open an RM by clicking the discuss button in order to discuss the proposal. CNC (talk) 03:21, 20 December 2025 (UTC)
@ExcitedA I think π is the symbol specifically and not the number, and I can see this being controversial. Plus, it isn't as easy to type. HurricaneZetaC 23:37, 18 December 2025 (UTC)
@ExcitedA Symbols... should never be used in titles Mach61 03:56, 20 December 2025 (UTC)
@Anti k-h Pppery said that a history merge isn't needed here, and this isn't the place for histmerges anyway. HurricaneZetaC 23:37, 18 December 2025 (UTC)
@Iskandar323 It looks like the undiscussed move was in 2013? It's been at that stable title for long enough that I believe an RM is needed to change it back. HurricaneZetaC 17:32, 19 December 2025 (UTC)
@TryKid It's been nearly 2 years since that move, so I believe it's been too long to revert per WP:RMUM. HurricaneZetaC 17:34, 19 December 2025 (UTC)
The punctuation of the title seems incorrect, as if describing a slaughter riot that is anti-cow. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 19:36, 19 December 2025 (UTC)
@Mach61 As far as I know, primary topic grabs are never considered uncontroversial. (Page movers have contested requests like these in the past. Please read WP:PCM.) Thanks, 1isall (he/him) (talk | contribs) 04:07, 20 December 2025 (UTC)
@Abo Yemen Sorry, but as Farmandeh Arkhar has just reverted/contested the move by moving it back, this move isn't uncontroversial. HurricaneZetaC 19:24, 20 December 2025 (UTC)
@Mr slav999 Actually, after looking at this, I reverted the undiscussed move on the main article since there was some disagreement in 2018 to moving the page (WP:RMUM #2). No objection to opening an RM about this, since it's been 7 years since that last discussion. HurricaneZetaC 20:03, 20 December 2025 (UTC)

Administrator needed

[edit source]