MyWiki:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/all/Cosmopolitan
Invalid title for TemplateStyles' src attribute.
Template:WP:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/Header
Template:WP:RSPNutshell
| type | website |
|---|---|
| shortcut | WP:COSMOPOLITAN |
| status | Template:WP:RSPSTATUS/sandbox no consensus |
| deprecated | no |
| blacklisted | no |
| recency | 2019 |
| Domain cosmopolitan.com | |
| in source code spamcheck tool | |
[[Category:Perennial sources deemed Template:WP:RSPSTATUS/expand in 2019]]
Summary
[edit source]There is no consensus on the reliability of Cosmopolitan. It is generally regarded as a situational source, which means context is important. The treatment of Cosmopolitan as a source should be decided on a case-by-case basis, depending on the article and the information to be verified.
Excerpt
[edit source]Cosmopolitan (stylized in all caps) is an American quarterly women's fashion and entertainment magazine first published in New York City in March 1886 as a family magazine; it was later transformed into a literary magazine and, since 1965, has become a women's magazine. Cosmopolitan is one of the best-selling magazines.
Discussions
[edit source]Links
[edit source]- WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 3#IMDb Publicity
- WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 109#Tell me if I'm in the right place
- WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 225#Usage of "serious" articles from Buzzfeed, Teen Vogue, and Cosmopolitan
- WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 249#Threesome
- WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 256#Is Cosmopolitan a reliable source?
Recency
[edit source]Original table row for comparison
[edit source]| Source | Status (legend) |
Discussions | Use | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| List | Last | Summary | |||
| Cosmopolitan Template:WP:RSPSHORTCUT | Template:WP:RSPSTATUS | 1 2 3 4 5 | Template:WP:RSPLAST | There is no consensus on the reliability of Cosmopolitan. It is generally regarded as a situational source, which means context is important. The treatment of Cosmopolitan as a source should be decided on a case-by-case basis, depending on the article and the information to be verified. | Template:WP:RSPUSES |