MyWiki:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/all/BuzzFeed
Invalid title for TemplateStyles' src attribute.
Template:WP:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/Header
Template:WP:RSPNutshell
| type | website |
|---|---|
| shortcut | WP:BUZZFEED |
| status | Template:WP:RSPSTATUS/sandbox no consensus |
| deprecated | no |
| blacklisted | no |
| recency | 2023 |
| Domain buzzfeed.com | |
| in source code spamcheck tool | |
[[Category:Perennial sources deemed Template:WP:RSPSTATUS/expand in 2023]]
BuzzFeed
[edit source]Summary
[edit source]Editors find the quality of BuzzFeed articles to be highly inconsistent. Respondents to a 2014 survey from the Pew Research Center on news sources in America ranked BuzzFeed at the bottom of the list.[1] BuzzFeed may use A/B testing for new articles, which may cause article content to change.[2] BuzzFeed operated a separate news division, BuzzFeed News, which had higher editorial standards and was hosted on a different website. See also: BuzzFeed News.
Excerpt
[edit source]BuzzFeed, Inc. is an American Internet media, news, and entertainment company with a focus on digital media. Based in New York City, BuzzFeed was founded in 2006 by Jonah Peretti and John S. Johnson III to focus on tracking viral content. Kenneth Lerer, co-founder and chairman of The Huffington Post, started as a co-founder and investor in BuzzFeed and is now the executive chairman.
Discussions
[edit source]Links
[edit source]- WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 93#BuzzFeed
- WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 179#BuzzFeed
- WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 188#Buzzfeed, Mother Jones for BLP's.
- WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 189#May Buzzfeed sometimes be an RS? (Article about Chris Epps)
- WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 213#Buzzfeed
- WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 231#Beware BuzzFeed articles for at least a day after publication
- WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 232#BuzzFeed and Amazon.com
- WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 245#BuzzFeed (yes, I know – again)
- WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 419#Additional content from BuzzFeed appearing on BuzzFeed News
Recency
[edit source]BuzzFeed News
[edit source]| type | website |
|---|---|
| shortcut | WP:BUZZFEEDNEWS |
| status | Template:WP:RSPSTATUS/sandbox generally reliable |
| deprecated | no |
| blacklisted | no |
| recency | 2023 |
| Domain buzzfeednews.com | |
| in source code spamcheck tool | |
[[Category:Perennial sources deemed Template:WP:RSPSTATUS/expand in 2023]]
Summary
[edit source]There is consensus that BuzzFeed News is generally reliable. BuzzFeed News operated separately from BuzzFeed, and most news content originally hosted on BuzzFeed was moved to the BuzzFeed News website in 2018.[3] In light of the staff layoffs at BuzzFeed in January 2019, some editors recommend exercising more caution for BuzzFeed News articles published after this date. The site's opinion pieces should be handled with WP:RSOPINION. BuzzFeed News shut down in May 2023, and its archives remain accessible.[4] See also: BuzzFeed.
Discussions
[edit source]Links
[edit source]- WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 179#BuzzFeed
- WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 222#Buzzfeed reporting remarks by unnamed senators
- WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 223#BuzzFeed yet again
- WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 225#Usage of "serious" articles from Buzzfeed, Teen Vogue, and Cosmopolitan
- WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 236#Huffington Post and BuzzFeed
- WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 239#Buzzfeed News as a source for text on PragerU
- WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 245#BuzzFeed (yes, I know - again)
- WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 259#BuzzFeed News downgrade?
- WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 330#Bellingcat
- WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 349#BuzzFeed News source on 2021 Maricopa County presidential ballot audit
- WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 403#Buzzfeed News shutting down - what now?
- WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 419#Additional content from BuzzFeed appearing on BuzzFeed News
Recency
[edit source]Notes and references
[edit source]- ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
- ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
- ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
- ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
Original table row for comparison
[edit source]| Source | Status (legend) |
Discussions | Use | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| List | Last | Summary | |||
| BuzzFeed Template:WP:RSPSHORTCUT | Template:WP:RSPSTATUS | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 | Template:WP:RSPLAST | Editors find the quality of BuzzFeed articles to be highly inconsistent. Respondents to a 2014 survey from the Pew Research Center on news sources in America ranked BuzzFeed at the bottom of the list.[1] BuzzFeed may use A/B testing for new articles, which may cause article content to change.[2] BuzzFeed operated a separate news division, BuzzFeed News, which had higher editorial standards and was hosted on a different website. See also: BuzzFeed News. | Template:WP:RSPUSES |
| BuzzFeed News Template:WP:RSPSHORTCUT | Template:WP:RSPSTATUS | 12[a] | Template:WP:RSPLAST | There is consensus that BuzzFeed News is generally reliable. BuzzFeed News operated separately from BuzzFeed, and most news content originally hosted on BuzzFeed was moved to the BuzzFeed News website in 2018.[3] In light of the staff layoffs at BuzzFeed in January 2019, some editors recommend exercising more caution for BuzzFeed News articles published after this date. The site's opinion pieces should be handled with WP:RSOPINION. BuzzFeed News shut down in May 2023, and its archives remain accessible.[4] See also: BuzzFeed. | Template:WP:RSPUSES |
Notes
[edit source]References
[edit source]- ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
- ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
- ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
- ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).