MyWiki:Reference desk/Archives/Language/2017 December 19

{| width = "100%"

|- ! colspan="3" align="center" | Language desk |- ! width="20%" align="left" | < December 18 ! width="25%" align="center"|<< Nov | December | Jan >> ! width="20%" align="right" |Current desk > |}

Welcome to the Wikipedia Language Reference Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages.

December 19

What is the antonym of "per se"?

What is the antonym of "per se" (by/in itself, excluding anything else)? I mean, "including anything else". --Yejianfei (talk) 11:43, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

in itself, of itself, by itself, as such, intrinsically. So, the antonym is likely extrinsically. 140.254.70.225 (talk) 14:49, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

including everything else, excluding itself. Maybe someone knowledgeable in Latin can make a translation, which can be used as an antonym for per se. 140.254.70.225 (talk) 15:03, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

Extrensic is the antonym of intrinsic, but it's not a good antonym of per se.[1] I was thinking et alii, or perhaps something even more encompassing than that. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 15:05, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

et omnia alia might work. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 15:09, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

• As the phrase means "by/in itself" I think "in the wider context" is the actual sense opposite to per se. What high-falutin Latinate term stands for that? inter alia makes sense. μηδείς (talk) 00:32, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

What's the antonym of camel ? I think Asia (If not a pie). I'm not sure if everything must have an antonym, but as far as "per se" is concerned, I think it does have an antonym, being "and likewise" (if not et cetera). HOTmag (talk) 00:36, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Is camel an adjective? ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 04:13, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Sometimes. InedibleHulk (talk) 00:05, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Colors have antonyms? ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 00:07, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Negative. That is to say, positively. See also the complementary colors. InedibleHulk (talk) 00:29, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Those are "opposites" but I don't think they qualify as "antonyms". ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 00:33, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

The colours themselves don't, but their words do. InedibleHulk (talk) 02:48, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

If you invert Tugs, he turns into Hugs. The main camel in camel turns a majestic sky blue, while the sky turns an eerie shade of camel. But yeah, the opposite of the animal is closer to Asia. InedibleHulk (talk) 06:28, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

• The antonym of "per se" is not required to be a Latin phrase. A native English phrase is allowed if it is accurate enough. --Yejianfei (talk) 01:58, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

• I wouldn't translate per se (at least as I sometimes use it) as by itself, more like as itself. —Tamfang (talk) 07:39, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

"In and of itself" might better fit the sense of per se as used in English. μηδείς (talk) 03:42, 22 December 2017 (UTC)