MyWiki:Reference desk/Archives/Computing/2016 April 27

{| width = "100%"

|- ! colspan="3" align="center" | Computing desk |- ! width="20%" align="left" | < April 26 ! width="25%" align="center"|<< Mar | April | May >> ! width="20%" align="right" |Current desk > |}

Welcome to the Wikipedia Computing Reference Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages.

April 27

Block ciphers with key-dependent S-boxes

Blowfish (cipher) and Twofish have key-dependent S-boxes. Are there any other block ciphers with this trait? Johnson&Johnson&Son (talk) 05:40, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Isn't that rather common? AES has key-dependent S-boxes and every year there are at least a hundred people who make up their own version of AES and continue to use key-dependent S-boxes. 209.149.115.199 (talk) 12:50, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

AES has a fixed S-box. Rijndael with a different S-box may be secure but isn't AES. I think you can replace the S-box in any cipher that has one, so the question is meaningless unless it's limited to variants that have some sort of official status. -- BenRG (talk) 22:27, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

You can replace the fixed S-box of any cipher that has fixed S-boxes. But I really don't see how you can replace the fixed S-boxes of existing ciphers with key-dependent S-boxes, since the key schedule doesn't provide a way to key them. So no, the question is not meaningless. Johnson&Johnson&Son (talk) 02:08, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

It is trivial to turn a fixed S-box into a key-dependent S-box. You calculate the S-boxes first, then do the encryption/decryption. The specific S-boxes in the United States federally accepted AES are fixed, but that doesn't mean that you have to use those S-boxes and ONLY those S-boxes. Those are just ones that have been tested to do well. You can use your own or make them on the fly using keys. 209.149.115.199 (talk) 16:23, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Khufu and REDOC II are two. Also, Applied Cryptography describes IDEA's multiplication mod 2¹⁶+1 as a key-dependent S-Box. -- BenRG (talk) 22:27, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Mercy (cipher) -- Finlay McWalter··–·Talk 22:46, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Searching for a nonexistent website

File:BELLE AIRE House in Roanoke VA.jpg claims that its source is the "Deyerle Family Association Website", and no evidence of proof is provided, so it's time for Commons:Template:npd. However, I figured I'd just find the website, and if the photo were still there, I could add a link as a rationale for speedy deletion. Problem: the website doesn't seem to exist, even though I found other online references to it, so I suppose it's been dead for a while. Is there a way to find a no-longer-extant website when nobody mentions a URL? Google won't provide long-dead URLs, and the Internet Archive requires the URL in the first place. In the end, I found a Geocities link through [1], but aside from its front page, it never got accessed by the Internet Archive, so this is now more of a general question than a help-me-with-this-specific-file question. Nyttend (talk) 12:08, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

I recommend time-travel (in either direction!) --Tagishsimon (talk) 12:35, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

PC video game

My Tom Clancy's H.A.W.X 2 not working, its telling me to play it online. Any idea why? -- Apostle (talk) 20:09, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Its developed and published by Ubisoft. This company has a history of exessive software protection, including enforcing an online connection to to play even if you dont play multiplayer. --Kharon (talk) 01:47, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Okay thank you File:Face-sad.svg -- Apostle (talk) 07:33, 28 April 2016 (UTC)