MyWiki:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Freemasonry/ToDo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete - if you really want the content for some reason, ask, but the consensus here is pretty clear. WilyD 08:12, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Freemasonry/ToDo

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Freemasonry/ToDo (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Page has been essentially unused for three years and is causing confusion as it is not the active todo list (Wikipedia:WikiProject_Freemasonry/ToDo) that is used for the project portal. RiverStyx23{_submarine^target} 02:05, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

• Delete as it has been superseded. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 12:47, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
• Delete - superseded and requested by an active member of the project. No reason to stand in the way of an in-project clean-up attempt. Stalwart111 13:08, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
• Don't delete it is the talk page for the actual to do list, so rewrite it to make that clear, or as a minimum redirect it to the project discussion page. Talk pages are useful and serve their own purpose. The-Pope (talk) 13:03, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

This page never had a talk page until this one was created; the project has no need of it. The page is unnecessary clutter. Project issues, including these, are better discussed on the project's talk page, not on talk pages created for subpages of the project page (and I've already been dunned once for doing that). It should be a project decision. RiverStyx23{_submarine^target} 13:23, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Then change it to a redirect page to where you want the discussion to take place, the project's talk page, rather than leave a red linked talk page, which just encourages someone to recreate it in the future. You don't need an MFD to do that.The-Pope (talk) 09:34, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

• Comment I've taken the bold action of blanking the previous content, adding a talk page header (to indicate the purpose of the page). I've left the MfD banner as the process clock is still running. Hasteur (talk) 22:34, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
• The idea of redirecting to the project talk page makes sense to me. Blueboar (talk) 15:39, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
  • I would be in agreement with that, but let's delete the page first and start clean. RiverStyx23{_submarine^target} 15:22, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --Kleinzach 05:47, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
• Delete, assuming that the nominator is speaking with the concurrence if the WikiProject. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:53, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.