MyWiki:Help desk/Archives/2014 August 7

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This template must be substituted. Replace {{Archive header with {{subst:Archive header.

{| width = "100%"

|- ! colspan="3" align="center" | Help desk |- ! width="20%" align="left" | < August 6 ! width="25%" align="center"|<< Jul | August | Sep >> ! width="20%" align="right" |Current help desk > |}

Welcome to the Wikipedia Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


August 7

[edit source]

Making major changes to articles by copying them into the Special namespace

[edit source]

Hi, I remember reading somewhere (possibly on some project page) that for creating/rewriting entire pages there's some functionality for starting a page in the special namespace and migrating it into the regular namespace once it's complete. Unfortunately I've lost track of where I saw this, and can't seem to find any reference to it anymore. How do I do this? Thanks! Ouroborosglyx ping me? 12:53, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

Quotes from foreign languages

[edit source]

How do we embed quotes from a foreign languages into the articles? How does it look like with translations? Any examples? SkywalkerPL (talk) 08:45, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

Why is the RFA process broken?

[edit source]

It looks to me like it works pretty fine. But everyone states it is a completely broken process, but pretty much every RFA I've seen has been accepted because the potential admin is a very good choice, and the one that have been rejected have been rejected because they are incredibly new or probably can't be trusted. Somebody explain why the process doesn't work? Grognard 123chess456 (talk) 03:24, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

@123chess456: because a minority of users choose to use it as a battleground to add nothing constructive or useful to the process? Although less of it goes on nowadays, the RfA process tends to overanalyse past contributions, as opposed to how they would be sutable as an admin (IMO). --Mdann52talk to me! 08:26, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
Past contributions indicate future performance. Doesn't seem broken to me! Grognard 123chess456 (talk) 08:33, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
Sometimes. InedibleHulk (talk) 11:07, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
Behaviors can change over time, so what might have been true two years ago as far as editing history may not be true 'today', so holding a candidate's past history against them is somewhat wrong, IMHO - unless they have not shown a change in that history at the time that they go through an RFA.   ArcAngel   (talk) ) 02:40, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Daily Mail and General Trust

[edit source]

I think this is about Daily Mail and General Trust (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Maproom (talk) 10:44, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

Requested edits normally go on the talk page of the article to which the request relates. I have collapsed the request here and removed the template and moved the request to the article talk page. SpinningSpark 00:20, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

Photo Upload

[edit source]

Hi There.

I would like to find out who uploaded the main image on this article. I would be interested to see if this is my dog? This dog looks exactly like mine even has the same white marking on the chest.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Africanis

Kindest regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by 105.227.222.114 (talk) 10:33, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

The page for the image is here. It says "Taken by Rudolph Botha, 2005/12/04, Pretoria, South Africa. ... 28 June 2007 (original upload date)". Maproom (talk) 10:37, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
Or maybe this one, with a lot of white on the chest. The image page says "Canis Africanis photographed nearby Graaff-reinet ... 23 June 2008". Maproom (talk) 10:42, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

How to read page reviews

[edit source]

I've received notifications that a couple of the articles on my Watchlist have been 'reviewed'. How can I read the review/see the outcome of it? Thanks pear 11:22, 7 August 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pear285 (talkcontribs)

I don't think this notification applies to formal, written reviews (as in Wikipedia:Peer review or Wikipedia:Articles for creation). Rather I think "reviewing" in this context just means the article has been checked by Wikipedia:New pages patrol or perhaps Wikipedia:Pending changes#Reviewing pending edits. All it means in this context is that an experienced editor's eyeballs have been on the article, and it checked out. I could be wrong, but that's what I remember it meaning. --Jayron32 12:12, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

Previewing references

[edit source]

Hello,

Is there a simple way to automatically view references in "preview" mode. My current method is to add "{{reflist}}" temporarily to the code while previewing; but this gets messy if I forget to delete it before saving!

Thanks! --Zfish118 (talk) 13:15, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

That is currently the only way to do it. But use {{reflistp}} as it only shows in preview mode and it is tracked in a category for later cleanup. There is a feature request for this on Bugzilla: T7984. --  Gadget850 talk 15:10, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
Well, another way is to edit the whole article rather than an individual section, so that the new reference(s) will show up in the article's existing References section when one previews. I realize that doing so can be bothersome when editing a long article, but I sometimes do this to avoid the problem of forgetting to remove an ad hoc {{reflist}}. Deor (talk) 16:37, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
Thank you. The concept behind Reflistp is exactly the kind of workaround I was looking for if no feature or gadget could produce this functionality. I had resorted to editing the whole page to preview, but that was generally not practical for editing tiny, one-space mistakes in very long articles. --Zfish118 (talk) 17:52, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

Emails

[edit source]

Not sure this is the right place for this question. If another editor and I preferred to have some exchanges on Wikipedia work via email rather than on our Talk pages – not for meatpuppeting purposes! – how can this be done without revealing each other's real names and email addresses? In other words, does the email facility on Wikipedia protect privacy and not reveal information about one's name and email address to anyone? --P123ct1 (talk) 15:30, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

You could send emails to each other via Wikipedia, but your email address will be revealed so that the recipient can reply to you. If protecting privacy is a primary concern I would recommend communicating via the WP Talk pages. More information is available at Wikipedia:Emailing users#Privacy. Cheers. DonIago (talk) 15:59, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
See WP:EMAIL for more detail, if you've not already found it. CaptRik (talk) 16:03, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
My Wikipedia email goes to a separate email address that I created just for Wikipedia. You could do the same. In the real name field of whatever account you use, simply use your username here. There are a bunch of free email services. I happen to use Gmail and my Wikipedia email gets checked at the same time as the rest of the email. Dismas|(talk) 17:43, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

How can I tell people on Wikipedia that I'm taking a break from it?

[edit source]

Because of the violations I made; I think taking a break is a good idea. Venustar84 (talk) 16:28, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

See Wikipedia:Wikibreak--S Philbrick(Talk) 16:33, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
I heard about it here, so that also works. I don't think we've met, but have a nice vacation! InedibleHulk (talk) 16:38, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

'User' ID: Does someone else perhaps have what I thought is my unique account name? How can I tell?

[edit source]

I try to log in but have forgotten my password. My 'account name' / 'user ID' appears still to exist; however, when I request an emailed 'reset' nothing appears in the inbox.

Since my email address hasn't changed, what springs to mind is that perhaps 'I' am no longer 'me' ...? (I'm pretty sure I have inscribed the correct personal account name.) So, might someone else now be using 'my' account? Aarrgh! This has the potential to become (or maybe it already is) an existential dilemma. Thanks for - anyone's - help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.66.92.141 (talk) 17:50, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

If you have forgotten the password then an account hijacking is not likely but at Special:Contributions you can see whether the account has made edits you didn't make. Mails often get lost in spam folders or elsewhere. Try checking for a spam folder in your mail software or on your mail providers web interface, or change spam settings and request a new mail. If you cannot receive a password mail and don't remember the password then you have to create a new account. PrimeHunter (talk) 18:24, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

Palm Beach Outlets

[edit source]

I am the marketing Director for the Palm Beach Outlets. I would like to change the name of the page back to Palm Beach Mall as the current page is generating an additional facebook page. Can you please advise how to do this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pamrada (talkcontribs) 18:28, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi, Pamrada. If "Palm Beach Outlets" is the correct current name of the company we cannot change the article title. The problem is with Facebook, not Wikipedia so you will need to contact them to resolve the problem. Please also note that Wikipedia is not at all interested in being part of any marketing plan, strategy or activity. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 19:32, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

Message to IP editor

[edit source]

I got a notice on wikipedia (I didn't even know I had an inbox there) while searching a page saying "I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, but that you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you" it was time stamped 19 October 2012. I've never edited any page on wikipedia. What's going on? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.30.255.129 (talk) 18:32, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

What's going on is that in October 2012, someone using the IP address 70.30.255.129 made an edit that needed to be corrected, and a message was left on that user's talk page, User talk:70.30.255.129. Now you are using that same IP address, and you became aware of the message. To avoid this happening again, you can register an account (see the "Create account" link near the top right of most pages). If you create an account and always log in to it, you won't get sent messages about some other person's actions. Also, other users won't be able to deduce from the IP address what part of the world you are in; you may value that anonymity. Maproom (talk) 19:24, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

I am trying to get the article on Xploration Nation - TV Shows changed to Xploration Station

[edit source]

I work for Steve Rotfeld Productions and we produce the 2 hour block called Xploration Station. About 6 months ago we changed the nae to Xploration Station from Xploration Nation. I don't know how all this works on Wikipedi, but I tried changing it and pissed your editors off. All I need is the article to be correct and represnt our TV show correctly. You can look on our new improved website for confirmation of the name change and see all our social media links refer you to all the Xploration Station pages. www.rotfeldproductions.com.

Can someone help me change your site to reflect the name change? If so Thank you so much

Matt — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mjay931979 (talkcontribs) 20:02, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

First, the technical point, most changes to articles are done by editing the text, but the title is a special case, which is changed by moving. I see a request for a move, but it was turned down. (I don't see any signs that anyone was annoyed, it is a very common situation.)
If you can supply some reliable source showing that the change has occurred (not planned to occur but had happened) it will be easy for someone to move it to the correct title. If you provide it here, I'll do it.--S Philbrick(Talk) 20:45, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
Sorry, missed that you did supply some evidence. I've moved it.--S Philbrick(Talk) 20:49, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

Syncing Saved Pages

[edit source]

Hi Wikipedia, I Have a Log In Account for both iPhone,ipad and my Android but I cannot see same saved items on all devices even when I synced? What did I miss? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alkalidodo (talkcontribs) 22:11, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

Is this question related to using Wikipedia? If not this is an inappropriate forum. You could try the reference desk. SpinningSpark 00:41, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

Image with caption to the side?

[edit source]

Is that possible?  I tried an image with caption in a {{quote box}} on the bottom (as seen here), but this spoils the page layout.  The current solution is really just a workaround and has some problems, such as the pull-quote not conforming to MoS. (as seen here).   Any suggestions?   —E:71.20.250.51 (talk) 22:11, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

You could achieve that with a table but it sounds like a bad idea to me to place the caption to the side. SpinningSpark 00:46, 8 August 2014 (UTC)