MyWiki:Articles for deletion/Python Paste

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Non-admin closure. Jujutacular ^T · C 20:03, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Python Paste

Python Paste (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable software. A plain google search doesn't yield signifianct coverage in reliable sources, just some technical and blog articles. Nothing on google news, and only a single mention in a technical article about something else in google news archives. Pontificalibus (talk) 11:54, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:10, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
• Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 14:36, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
• Keep. Paster (aka Paste Script) is part of Paste, and it's covered [1] to a significant extent this book on Plone, and similarly so in this [2] book on Pylons, because it's part of the common plumbing used by both frameworks. Pcap ping 07:32, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:27, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

• Keep per the references found by Pcap. It certainly does need to be cleaned up, though. TJRC (talk) 01:44, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
• Keep per Pcap and TJRC. LotLE×talk 02:10, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
• Weak keep File:Symbol keep vote.svg Seems to meet the minimum standardss for notability, but it should probably be spruced up with the references.--Ipatrol (talk) 22:21, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.