MyWiki:Articles for deletion/Optical modulators using semiconductor nano-structures
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Stifle (talk) 10:01, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
- Optical modulators using semiconductor nano-structures (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Procedural AfD. Was prodded under "Fork of multiple article". I'm neutral, but prodding would remove a lot of potential mergable material. Headbomb {ταλκκοντριβς – WP Physics} 11:19, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 14:06, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
Opposed: No argument is found here or on the article talk page for why this article should be deleted. The connection to nanostructures is not well presented, but otherwise the article seems OK. Brews ohare (talk) 15:22, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
Comment:: The author removed the AfD notice a day or so ago, I've now restored it.Headbomb {ταλκκοντριβς – WP Physics} 12:27, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
Comment Headbomb, removing the AfD notice may cast a bad light on this article or the user that created the article, but he (or she) may be new. In any case, I would need more information concerning the deletion, or keep, of this article. I don't see content forking, or POV forking, at first glance and this appears to be a very good article. I asked you some questions on the article's talk page, if you don't mind. Danke schön! спасибо! Ti-30X (talk) 02:32, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
Apparently, when I wrote my "inquiry" in the article talk page I didn't save the page before I closed the window. Well, I can address my concerns here. I am wondering if the the same user created three different artiles with three different ID's. ? Where or what is the content fork, or POV fork related to this article? Danke schön! спасибо! Thanks! Ti-30X (talk) 18:30, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | Talk 01:20, 14 June 2009 (UTC) - The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.