MyWiki:Articles for deletion/Measuring function
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Stifle (talk) 11:35, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
- Measuring function (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Contested prod, not by me. This is a dictionary definition, and looks like it always will be; transwiki to Wiktionary Septentrionalis PMAnderson 16:48, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
- Keep No consideration seems to have been given to good alternatives to deletion such as merger with Size theory. Per WP:BEFORE, If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a good candidate for AfD. Colonel Warden (talk) 16:58, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
- Make mine Strong and immediate transwiki then. This article seems to have been created to move this definition out of size theory, which (with its related articles) are the only things that link here - or are ever likely to. Wiktionary exists for this purpose. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 17:08, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
- My initial tentative conclusion would be to merge this into size theory and redirect it to that article. Maybe I'll say more tomorrow or the next day..... Michael Hardy (talk) 04:31, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
- Also appears in natural pseudodistance and size pair, which is why to put this definition in Wiktionary; but perhaps we can consolidate all four. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 17:42, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
- Keep The 2 given references are reliable and verifiable Rirunmot (talk) 00:45, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
- Keep, important mathematical concept, properly referenced. JIP | Talk 07:06, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.