MyWiki:Articles for deletion/Hi Performance FileSystem
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to HP-UX without prejudice against selective merge. Unresolved talk page discussions about the title can be worked out at the talk page. (non-admin closure) Left guide (talk) 09:03, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Hi Performance FileSystem (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG Clenpr (talk) 07:58, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:53, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
* Speedy keep: with WP:NPASR. Drive-by nomination with no evidence of WP:BEFORE; nominator has previously been warned for nominating without evidence of BEFORE. Dclemens1971 (talk) 14:05, 28 August 2025 (UTC) Striking since !vote is now mooted by below discussion. Dclemens1971 (talk) 18:38, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
- Delete: the article makes no attempt to provide sources meeting GNG, and the topic has had no academic coverage and no coverage in textbooks of any kind. The topic can be briefly mentioned with the source at HP-UX, though if so, the disputed title (unresolved talk page discussion since 2 years ago) should be resolved. Caleb Stanford (talk) 23:48, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
- Merge/redirect to HP-UX. The article title is indeed misspelled. It's supposed to be "High Performance File System" (hyphen optional). Searching that yields several secondary sources, though not much since it's by most accounts a faithful clone of UFS without much in the way of proprietary modification. DigitalIceAge (talk) 17:21, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.