Musical argument
A musical argument is a means of creating tension through the relation of expressive content and musical form:
Traditional dialectal[a] music is representational: the musical form relates to an expressive content and is a means of creating a growing tension; this is what is usually called the musical argument.
— Wim Mertens (1999)[1]
Experimental musical forms may use process or indeterminacy rather than argument.[2]
The musical argument may be characterized as the primary flow and current idea being presented in a piece:
The very definition of musical argument is something that keeps going, and you uncover new details and new combinations. A musical argument is not the same as a verbal argument. A verbal argument implies that there's [sic] two sides; a musical argument makes the two sides one thing, like counterpoint. A fugue is like that; a double fugue, at least, takes two different ideas and shows you how they relate, and it shows you how they're the same thing.
Thus one may hear of a musical argument being interrupted, extended, or repeated.[original research?]
See also
[edit | edit source]Notes
[edit | edit source]- ^ The purpose of the dialectic method of reasoning is resolution of disagreement through rational discussion between opposing viewpoints.
References
[edit | edit source]- ^ Mertens, Wim (1999). American Minimal Music: La Monte Young, Terry Riley, Steve Reich, Philip Glass, reprinted edition (London: Kahn & Averill), p.88. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).. Quoted in LaBelle, Brandon (2006). Background Noise (London and New York: Continuum), p.7. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value)..
- ^ LaBelle (2006), p.7.
- ^ Gans, David (2002). Conversations With The Dead, p.166. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value)..