Littlewood conjecture
In mathematics, the Littlewood conjecture is an open problem in Diophantine approximation, proposed by J. E. Littlewood around 1930. It states that for any two real numbers and ,
where is the distance to the nearest integer.
Formulation and explanation
[edit | edit source]This means the following: take a point (α, β) in the plane, and then consider the sequence of points
- (2α, 2β), (3α, 3β), ... .
For each of these, multiply the distance to the closest line with integer x-coordinate by the distance to the closest line with integer y-coordinate. This product will certainly be at most 1/4. The conjecture makes no statement about whether this sequence of values will converge; it typically does not, in fact. The conjecture states something about the limit inferior, and says that there is a subsequence for which the distances decay faster than the reciprocal, i.e.
- o(1/n)
in the little-o notation.
Connection to further conjectures
[edit | edit source]In 1955 Cassels and Swinnerton-Dyer.[1] showed that Littlewood's Conjecture would follow from the following conjecture in the geometry of numbers in the case :
Conjecture 1: Let L be the product of n linear forms on . Suppose and L is not a multiple of a form with integer coefficients. Then .
Conjecture 1 is equivalent to the following conjecture concerning the orbits of the diagonal subgroup D on as was essentially noticed by Cassels and Swinnerton-Dyer.
Conjecture 2: Let . For any , if the orbit is relatively compact, then is closed.
This is due to Margulis. [2] Conjecture 2 is a special case of the following far more general conjecture, also due to Margulis.
Conjecture 3: Let G be a connected Lie group, a lattice in G, and H a closed connected subgroup generated by -split elements, i.e. all eigenvalues of are real for each generator g. Then for any , exactly one of the following holds:
- is homogeneous, i.e. there is a closed subgroup F of G such that .
- There exists a closed connected subgroup F of G and a continuous epimorphism from F onto a Lie group L such that , is closed in , is closed in L where is the stabilizer, and is a one-parameter subgroup of L containing no non-trivial -unipotent elements, i.e. elements g for which 1 is the only eigenvalue of .
Partial results
[edit | edit source]Borel showed in 1909 that the exceptional set of real pairs (α,β) violating the statement of the conjecture is of Lebesgue measure zero.[3] Manfred Einsiedler, Anatole Katok and Elon Lindenstrauss have shown[4] that it must have Hausdorff dimension zero;[5] and in fact is a union of countably many compact sets of box-counting dimension zero. The result was proved by using a measure classification theorem for diagonalizable actions of higher-rank groups, and an isolation theorem proved by Lindenstrauss and Barak Weiss.
These results imply that non-trivial pairs (i.e., pairs (α,β) which are individually badly approximable and where 1, α, and β are linearly independent over ) satisfying the conjecture exist: indeed, given a real number α such that , it is possible to construct an explicit β such that (α,β) is non-trivial and satisfies the conjecture.[6]
See also
[edit | edit source]References
[edit | edit source]- ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
- ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
- ^ Adamczewski & Bugeaud (2010) p.444
- ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
- ^ Adamczewski & Bugeaud (2010) p.445
- ^ Adamczewski & Bugeaud (2010) p.446
- Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
Further reading
[edit | edit source]- Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).