Identity theorem
In real analysis and complex analysis, branches of mathematics, the identity theorem for analytic functions states: given functions f and g analytic on a domain D (open and connected subset of or ), if f = g on some , where has an accumulation point in D, then f = g on D.[1]
Thus an analytic function is completely determined by its values on a single open neighborhood in D, or even a countable subset of D (provided this contains a converging sequence together with its limit). This is not true in general for real-differentiable functions, even infinitely real-differentiable functions. In comparison, analytic functions are a much more rigid notion.
The underpinning fact from which the theorem is established is the expandability of a holomorphic function into its Taylor series.
The connectedness assumption on the domain D is necessary. For example, if D consists of two disjoint open sets, can be on one open set, and on another, while is on one, and on another.
Lemma
[edit | edit source]If two holomorphic functions and on a domain D agree on a set S which has an accumulation point in , then on a disk in centered at .
To prove this, it is enough to show that for all , since both functions are analytic.
If this is not the case, let be the smallest nonnegative integer with . By holomorphy, we have the following Taylor series representation in some open neighborhood U of :
By continuity, is non-zero in some small open disk around . But then on the punctured set . This contradicts the assumption that is an accumulation point of .
This lemma shows that for a complex number , the fiber is a discrete (and therefore countable) set, unless .
Proof
[edit | edit source]Define the set on which and have the same Taylor expansion:
We'll show is nonempty, open, and closed. Then by connectedness of , must be all of , which implies on .
By the lemma, in a disk centered at in , they have the same Taylor series at , so , hence is nonempty.
As and are holomorphic on , , the Taylor series of and at have non-zero radius of convergence. Therefore, the open disk also lies in for some . So is open.
By holomorphy of and , they have holomorphic derivatives, so all are continuous. This means that is closed for all . is an intersection of closed sets, so it's closed.
Full characterisation
[edit | edit source]Since the identity theorem is concerned with the equality of two holomorphic functions, we can simply consider the difference (which remains holomorphic) and can simply characterise when a holomorphic function is identically . The following result can be found in.[2]
Claim
[edit | edit source]Let denote a non-empty, connected open subset of the complex plane. For analytic the following are equivalent.
- on ;
- the set contains an accumulation point, ;
- the set is non-empty, where .
Proof
[edit | edit source](1 2) holds trivially.
(2 3) is shown in section Lemma in part with Taylor expansion at accumulation point, just substitute g=0.
(3 1) is shown in section Proof with set where all derivatives of f-g vanishes, just substitute g=0.
See also
[edit | edit source]References
[edit | edit source]- Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).