Identity theorem

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

In real analysis and complex analysis, branches of mathematics, the identity theorem for analytic functions states: given functions f and g analytic on a domain D (open and connected subset of or ), if f = g on some SD, where S has an accumulation point in D, then f = g on D.[1]

Thus an analytic function is completely determined by its values on a single open neighborhood in D, or even a countable subset of D (provided this contains a converging sequence together with its limit). This is not true in general for real-differentiable functions, even infinitely real-differentiable functions. In comparison, analytic functions are a much more rigid notion.

The underpinning fact from which the theorem is established is the expandability of a holomorphic function into its Taylor series.

The connectedness assumption on the domain D is necessary. For example, if D consists of two disjoint open sets, f can be 0 on one open set, and 1 on another, while g is 0 on one, and 2 on another.

Lemma

[edit | edit source]

If two holomorphic functions f and g on a domain D agree on a set S which has an accumulation point c in D, then f=g on a disk in D centered at c.

To prove this, it is enough to show that f(n)(c)=g(n)(c) for all n0, since both functions are analytic.

If this is not the case, let m be the smallest nonnegative integer with f(m)(c)g(m)(c). By holomorphy, we have the following Taylor series representation in some open neighborhood U of c:

(fg)(z)=(zc)m[(fg)(m)(c)m!+(zc)(fg)(m+1)(c)(m+1)!+]=(zc)mh(z).

By continuity, h is non-zero in some small open disk B around c. But then fg0 on the punctured set B{c}. This contradicts the assumption that c is an accumulation point of {f=g}.

This lemma shows that for a complex number a, the fiber f1(a) is a discrete (and therefore countable) set, unless fa.

Proof

[edit | edit source]

Define the set on which f and g have the same Taylor expansion: T={zD|f(k)(z)=g(k)(z) for all k0}=k=0{zD|(f(k)g(k))(z)=0}.

We'll show T is nonempty, open, and closed. Then by connectedness of D, T must be all of D, which implies f=g on T=D.

By the lemma, f=g in a disk centered at c in D, they have the same Taylor series at c, so cT, hence T is nonempty.

As f and g are holomorphic on D, wT, the Taylor series of f and g at w have non-zero radius of convergence. Therefore, the open disk Br(w) also lies in T for some r. So T is open.

By holomorphy of f and g, they have holomorphic derivatives, so all f(n),g(n) are continuous. This means that {zD|(f(k)g(k))(z)=0} is closed for all k. S is an intersection of closed sets, so it's closed.

Full characterisation

[edit | edit source]

Since the identity theorem is concerned with the equality of two holomorphic functions, we can simply consider the difference (which remains holomorphic) and can simply characterise when a holomorphic function is identically 0. The following result can be found in.[2]

Claim

[edit | edit source]

Let G denote a non-empty, connected open subset of the complex plane. For analytic h:G the following are equivalent.

  1. h0 on G;
  2. the set G0={zGh(z)=0} contains an accumulation point, z0;
  3. the set G=n0Gn is non-empty, where Gn:={zGh(n)(z)=0}.

Proof

[edit | edit source]

(1 2) holds trivially.

(2 3) is shown in section Lemma in part with Taylor expansion at accumulation point, just substitute g=0.

(3 1) is shown in section Proof with set where all derivatives of f-g vanishes, just substitute g=0.

Q.E.D.

See also

[edit | edit source]

References

[edit | edit source]
  1. ^ For real functions, see Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  2. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  • Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).