Ixodidae

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Hard ticks)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Ixodidae
Temporal range: Cretaceous–present
Ixodes ricinus (engorged)
Ixodes ricinus (engorged)
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Arthropoda
Subphylum: Chelicerata
Class: Arachnida
Order: Ixodida
Superfamily: Ixodoidea
Family: Ixodidae
C. L. Koch, 1844
Diversity
18 genera, about 769 species

The Ixodidae are the family of hard ticks or scale ticks,[1] one of the three families of ticks, consisting of 750 species, as of 2025.[2] They are known as 'hard ticks' because they have a scutum or hard shield, which the other major family of ticks, the 'soft ticks' (Argasidae), lack. They are ectoparasites of a wide range of host species, and some are vectors of pathogens that can cause human disease.[3]

Description

[edit | edit source]

The Ixodidae are distinguished from the Argasidae by the presence of a scutum.[4] In both the nymph and the adult, a prominent gnathosoma (or capitulum, mouth and feeding parts) projects forward from the animal's body; in the Argasidae, conversely, the gnathosoma is concealed beneath the body.[citation needed]

Ixodidae attach to a host bite painlessly and are generally unnoticed, and they remain in place until they engorge and are ready to moult; this process may take days or weeks. Some species drop off the host to moult in a safe place, whereas others remain on the same host and only drop off once they are ready to lay their eggs.[citation needed]

Classification

[edit | edit source]

The Ixodidae is divided into two groups: the Prostriata and the Metastriata, distinguished by the position of the anal groove, which is anterior in the former, and posterior in the latter.[5] The Metastriata are further divided into two lineages, Amblyocephalus and Haematobothrion.[6][7] As of 2025, the Ixodidae is composed of 769 extant species in 18 genera, in addition to two fossil genera.[2]

Ixodidae
Ixodidae cladogram after Barker et al., (2024)[8]
File:Ticks Donitz.jpg
The Ixodidae is composed of a wide range of genera. The family is distinguished by the presence of a hard, shell-like scutum
Lineage Genera # of Species
Prostriata Ixodinae Ixodes Latreille, 1795 274
Metastriata Amblyocephalus Amblyomma Koch, 1844 135[a]
Anomalohimalaya Hoogstraal, Kaiser & Mitchell, 1970 3
Cosmiomma Schulze, 1919 1
Dermacentor Koch, 1844 43
Hyalomma Koch, 1844 28
Margaropus Karsch, 1879 3
Nosomma Schulze, 1919 1[b]
Rhipicentor Nuttall & Warburton, 1908 2
Rhipicephalus Koch, 1844 90
Haematobothrion Alloceraea Schulze, 1919[11] 6
Archaeocroton Dumbleton, 1943[12] 1
Bothriocroton Keirans, King & Sharrad, 1994 7
Cryptocroton Barker & Barker[13] 1
Haemaphysalis Koch, 1844 170[c]
Sharifiella Santos Dias, 1958[15] 1
Unresolved Africaniella Travassos Dias, 1974[9] 2
Robertsicus Barker & Burger, 2018[16] 1
769

Fossil genera[d]


The Ixodidae is also sometimes classified by its subfamilies, but the current formulations do not encompass all species. There are currently five recognised subfamilies:

Medical importance

[edit | edit source]

Many hard ticks are of considerable medical importance, acting as vectors of diseases caused by bacteria, protozoa, and viruses, such as Rickettsia and Borrelia.[4] Other tick-borne diseases include Lyme disease, babesiosis, ehrlichiosis, Rocky Mountain spotted fever, anaplasmosis, Southern tick-associated rash illness, tick-borne relapsing fever, tularemia, Colorado tick fever, Powassan encephalitis, and Q fever.[20] Ixodid ticks are the primary vectors of tick paralysis, which can affect domestic dogs, cats and livestock, as well as humans.[21]

Notes

[edit | edit source]
  1. ^ The elevation of Africaniella in 2020, and Cryptocroton in 2024 reduces the count of this genus in Guglielmone et al (2020) by three.[9][10]
  2. ^ N. keralensis was proposed in 2007, but has subsequently been rejected
  3. ^ The elevation of Alloceraea in 2024 reduces the count of this genus in Guglielmone et al (2020) by six.[14]
  4. ^ Other genera, such as Alloceraea and Bothriocroton have recognised paleobiota species
  5. ^ Hyalomma and Nosomma were formerly considered part of the Hyalomminae, but this subfamily has subsequently been sunk into the Rhipicephalinae.[18][19]

See also

[edit | edit source]

Lua error in mw.title.lua at line 392: bad argument #2 to 'title.new' (unrecognized namespace name 'Portal').

References

[edit | edit source]
  1. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  2. ^ a b Guglielmone, A. A., Petney, T. N., & Robbins, R. G. (2020). Ixodidae (Acari: Ixodoidea): descriptions and redescriptions of all known species from 1758 to December 31, 2019. Zootaxa, 4871(1). https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4871.1.1
  3. ^ Sonenshine, D. E., & Roe, R. (2014). Biology of ticks. (Second edition). Oxford University Press.
  4. ^ a b Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  5. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  6. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  7. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  8. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  9. ^ a b Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  10. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  11. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  12. ^ Barker, S. C., & Burger, T. D. (2018). Two new genera of hard ticks, Robertsicus n. Gen. And Archaeocroton n. Gen., and the solution to the mystery of Hoogstraal's and Kaufman's "primitive" tick from the Carpathian Mountains. Zootaxa, 4500(4). https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4500.4.4
  13. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  14. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  15. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  16. ^ Barker, S. C., & Burger, T. D. (2018). Two new genera of hard ticks, Robertsicus n. Gen. And Archaeocroton n. Gen., and the solution to the mystery of Hoogstraal's and Kaufman's "primitive" tick from the Carpathian Mountains. Zootaxa, 4500(4). https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4500.4.4
  17. ^ Barker, S.C., Kelava, S., Murrell, A., Cho, M., Teo, E.J.M., Nakao, R. & Apanaskevich, D.A. (2025) Margaropus Karsch, 1879 is not closely related to Boophilus Curtice, 1891 (Acari: Ixodidae). Zootaxa, 5569 (3), 477–492. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5569.3.4
  18. ^ Barker, S. C., & Murrell, A. (2002). Phylogeny, Evolution and Historical Zoogeography of Ticks: A Review of Recent Progress.
  19. ^ Nava S, Guglielmone AA, Mangold AJ. An overview of systematics and evolution of ticks. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed). 2009 Jan 1;14(8):2857-77. doi: 10.2741/3418. PMID: 19273240.
  20. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  21. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
[edit | edit source]
  • File:Wikispecies-logo.svg Data related to Ixodidae at Wikispecies
  • Error creating thumbnail: File missing Media related to Lua error in Module:Commons_link at line 62: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value). at Wikimedia Commons

Lua error in Module:Taxonbar at line 165: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value). Lua error in Module:Authority_control at line 153: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).