Global System of Trade Preferences among Developing Countries

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Global System of Trade Preferences among Developing Countries
File:GSTP Membership Map.jpg
Status as of Feb 10, 2023
TypePreferential Trade Agreement
SignedApril 13, 1988
LocationBelgrade, Serbia
EffectiveApril 19, 1989[1]
Parties
42 states[2]
DepositaryMorocco, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development
LanguagesArabic, English, French, Spanish

The Global System of Trade Preferences among Developing Countries (GSTP)[3] is a preferential trade agreement, currently encompassing 42 members ("participants"), signed on 13 April 1988 with the aim of increasing trade between developing countries. It was negotiated within the framework of the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). The Agreement  entered into force on 19 April 1989 and was notified to the then General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), predecessor of the World Trade Organization (WTO), on 25 September 1989. The 42 members of GSTP include 7 LDCs as well (Bangladesh, Benin, Guinea, Mozambique, Myanmar, Sudan, and Tanzania).

The Agreement was initiated by UNCTAD to promote trade among developing countries, thereby fostering economic growth and South-South cooperation and has its roots in the Group of 77, a coalition of 134 developing countries created in 1964 to increase their negotiating leverage and promote their economic interests.

The GSTP was established in 1989 as a framework for preferential tariff reductions and other measures of cooperation, including "para-tariffs, non-tariff measures, direct trade measures including medium and long-term contracts and sectoral agreements", to stimulate trade between developing countries. Today, only preferential tariffs are covered by the agreement.

Through the framework of the GSTP, its participants aim to promote economic growth and development by capitalizing on South-South trade. Institutionally, the Committee of Participants (COP) is the highest decision-making organ of the GSTP and has the mandate to oversee the operation of the Agreement. The UNCTAD Secretariat provides substantive and technical support to the operation of the GSTP Agreement.

GSTP economies represented a market of US$14 trillion in 2018, having grown at an average of 10.3% since 2000, nearly twice the world average growth. These economies generated an import demand of some US$4 trillion in 2018, or 20% of total world imports.

History

[edit | edit source]

Background

[edit | edit source]

The first efforts to implement a preferential trading system at the plurilateral level that would encompass developing countries started in the mid-60s. In fact, following the establishment of the GATT Committee of Trade and Development in 1965,[4] the Group on Expansion of Trade among Developing Countries was set up to analyze the dynamics behind trade among developing countries.[5] In 1967, the first meeting of the Trade Negotiations Committee of Developing Countries in GATT was held. The Committee aim was to collect list of exports and concessions from developing countries in order to reach a common ground.

In 1971 a Protocol on Trade Negotiations among Developing Countries (PTN)[6] was agreed under the auspices of the Trade Negotiations Committee of Developing Countries and signed by 16 countries (Brazil, Chile, Egypt, Greece, India, Israel, Korea, Pakistan, Peru, Spain, Tunisia, Türkiye, Uruguay, Yugoslavia, Mexico and the Philippines), entering into force in 1973. As stated in the Protocol, the countries "agreed that the establishment of preferences among developing countries, appropriately administered and subject to the necessary safeguards, could make an important contribution to the trade among developing countries, and that such arrangements should be looked at in a constructive and forward-looking spirit". The protocol covered 740 tariff positions, of whom one third covered agricultural products and raw materials.

In parallel, the Group of 77 was working to promote the change necessary to realise the conditions that would foster economic development for developing countries. During the 1976 Mexico City Conference on Economic Co-operation among Developing Countries, a detailed programme[7] on economic co-operation was compiled. The programme covered trade extensively and provided the conceptual basis for the GSTP. In fact, section XV. "Trade among developing countries" expressly mentioned the intention to "review all tariff and non-tariff problems relating to development of trade among developing countries" and "establish a system of trade preferences among developing countries at the subregional, regional, and interregional levels. Such a system should not allow the extension to developed countries of preferences granted to developing countries". The programme would be endorsed during the Fourth Ministerial Meeting of the Group of 77 in Arusha in 1979 and developed further in Caracas in 1981.

Negotiations

[edit | edit source]

In 1982, Ministers of Foreign Affairs belonging to the Group of 77 met in New York and defined the main components of the Agreement, establishing the negotiations framework as well. The Group of 77 began preparatory work in Geneva in 1984 with Ministerial impetus provided in 1985 through the New Delhi Ministerial Meeting.

It is during the Ministerial Meeting in Brasilia in 1986 that the GSTP was established as a provisional legal framework. The negotiations on the text of the Agreement were to be completed two years after in Belgrade, jointly with the first round of tariff reduction negotiations.

In April 1989, when the Agreement entered into force, the schedules of tariff concessions covered more than 1800 tariff items. These number was reduced to less than 1000 after the dissolution on Yugoslavia and the withdrawal of Romania from the Agreement.

São Paulo Round

[edit | edit source]

In 2004, GSTP participants decided to start new negotiations. A Third Round of Trade Negotiations was launched on the occasion of UNCTAD XI in São Paulo, Brazil.[8] This round of negotiations is called the São Paulo Round. Under the authority of the GSTP Negotiating Committee, the 22 participants (Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay, and Uruguay (forming Mercosur), Algeria, Chile, Cuba, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Egypt, India, Indonesia, Iran, Malaysia, Mexico, Morocco, Nigeria, Pakistan, Republic of Korea, Sri Lanka, Thailand, Vietnam and Zimbabwe) aimed at broadening and deepening tariff concessions.[9]

During the negotiations, ministerial guidance was provided in April 2008 on the occasion of UNCTAD XII, in Accra, Ghana.[10] Subsequently, meeting in December 2009 in Geneva, Ministers approved the parameters ("modalities") for exchanging tariff concessions.[11] The Ministerial Decision on Modalities of 2 December 2009[12] included, in par. 7, "(a) an across-the-board, line-by-line, linear cut of at least 20 per cent on at least 70 per cent of their dutiable tariff lines; or (b) in the case of Participants with duty-free tariff lines accounting for more than 50 per cent of their total national tariff lines an across-the-board, line-by-line, linear cut of at least 20 per cent on at least 60 per cent of their dutiable tariff lines; and (c) the proposed schedule of tariff concessions shall be presented in the same format as the schedules annexed to this Protocol." The modalities provided for differential and more favorable treatment within the market access modalities.

After six years of negotiations, the Round was concluded on 15-16 December 2010 at a Ministerial Meeting in Foz do Iguaçu, Brazil, where 8 participants (counting Mercosur as one) exchanged tariff concessions and adopted the São Paulo Round Protocol.[12] These are: Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay (forming Mercosur), the Republic of Korea, India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Egypt, Morocco and Cuba.

Implementation

[edit | edit source]

Under paragraph 10 (c) of the Protocol, the results of the São Paulo Round will enter into force with the ratification of at least four countries. Currently, Argentina (2018), Brazil (2022), Cuba (2013), India (2010), Malaysia (2011) and Uruguay (2017) ratified the Agreement.[13] However, ratification by all four members of Mercosur is required for the Protocol to be deemed to have been ratified by Mercosur as a group, as the group maintains a single schedule of tariff concessions as a customs union with common external tariffs. Pending one more ratification, the São Paulo Round results remain to be implemented.

Membership

[edit | edit source]

GSTP membership and São Paulo Round participants

[edit | edit source]
GSTP Members (42) Participating in the “São Paulo Round” Signatory members of the final Protocol of the “São Paulo Round” Ratification
File:Flag of Algeria.svg Algeria Yes
File:Flag of Argentina.svg Argentina Yes Through MERCOSUR Yes
File:Flag of Bangladesh.svg Bangladesh
File:Flag of Benin.svg Benin
File:Flag of Bolivia.svg The Plurinational State of Bolivia
File:Flag of Brazil.svg Brazil Yes Through MERCOSUR Yes
File:Flag of Cameroon.svg Cameroon
File:Flag of Chile.svg Chile Yes
File:Flag of Cuba.svg Cuba Yes Yes Yes
File:Flag of North Korea.svg Democratic People’s Republic of Korea Yes
File:Flag of Ecuador.svg Ecuador
File:Flag of Egypt.svg Egypt Yes Yes
File:Flag of Ghana.svg Ghana
File:Flag of Guinea.svg Guinea
File:Flag of Guyana.svg Guyana
File:Flag of India.svg India Yes Yes Yes
File:Flag of Indonesia.svg Indonesia Yes Yes
File:Flag of Iran.svg The Islamic Republic of Iran Yes
File:Flag of Iraq.svg Iraq
File:Flag of Libya.svg Libya
File:Flag of Malaysia.svg Malaysia Yes Yes Yes
File:Flag of Mexico.svg Mexico Yes
File:Flag of Morocco.svg Morocco Yes Yes
File:Flag of Mozambique.svg Mozambique
File:Flag of Myanmar.svg Myanmar
File:Flag of Nicaragua.svg Nicaragua
File:Flag of Nigeria.svg Nigeria Yes
File:Flag of Pakistan.svg Pakistan Yes
File:Flag of Paraguay.svg Paraguay Yes Through MERCOSUR
File:Flag of Peru.svg Peru
File:Flag of the Philippines.svg Philippines
File:Flag of South Korea.svg South Korea Yes Yes
File:Flag of Singapore.svg Singapore
File:Flag of Sri Lanka.svg Sri Lanka Yes
File:Flag of Sudan.svg Sudan
File:Flag of Thailand.svg Thailand Yes
File:Flag of Trinidad and Tobago.svg Trinidad and Tobago
File:Flag of Tunisia.svg Tunisia
File:Flag of Tanzania.svg The United Republic of Tanzania
File:Flag of Uruguay.svg Uruguay Yes Through MERCOSUR Yes
File:Flag of Venezuela.svg The Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela
File:Flag of Vietnam.svg Vietnam Yes
File:Flag of Zimbabwe.svg Zimbabwe Yes
File:Flag of Mercosur.svg Mercosur Yes Yes

Former members: Yugoslavia (from 1989-04-19 until dissolution), Romania (from 1989-04-19 until its EU membership), Colombia (from 1989-04-19 until 2017).

Implications for South-South trade

[edit | edit source]

South-South trade represents an important untapped potential for developing countries.[14] The reasons lie in its growth in terms of value – the total South-South trade was US$600 billion in 1995 and it hit US$5.3 trillion in 2021[15] – and its overall volume – trade volume between developing countries is now higher than the one between developing and developed countries.

GSTP participants represent significant markets as well. Collectively, the 43 GSTP economies (including Colombia) represented a market of US$14 trillion in 2018, having grown at 10.3 per cent since 2000s, nearly twice the world average growth. In addition, these economies generated an import demand of some US$4 trillion in 2018, or 20 per cent of total world imports. In addition, it provides opportunities for diversification and resilience. Research shows that South-South trade tends to foster non-traditional exports, including agro-industrial products and higher value-added and technology intensive manufactured goods, and makes it easier for firms to move up the value chain.[16]

The GSTP represents an important step further towards stronger South-South trade integration and cooperation. In particular, the São Paulo Round provided a major impulse to South-South trade. Current signatories have a combined population of over 2 billion. In terms of the Agreement, while previous rounds of 1992 and 1998 covered some 650 tariff lines, the São Paulo Round is set to cover over 47,000.

A preliminary model-based estimates by UNCTAD find that the São Paulo Round outputs will have a significant positive welfare effect.[17] In fact, estimates suggest that implementation of the São Paulo Round by all eleven of its current signatories will result in shared welfare gains of US$14 billion.

See also

[edit | edit source]

References

[edit | edit source]
  1. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  2. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  3. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  4. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  5. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  6. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  7. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  8. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  9. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  10. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  11. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  12. ^ a b Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  13. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  14. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  15. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  16. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  17. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
[edit | edit source]