Formally smooth map
In algebraic geometry and commutative algebra, a ring homomorphism is called formally smooth (from French: Formellement lisse) if it satisfies the following infinitesimal lifting property:
Suppose B is given the structure of an A-algebra via the map f. Given a commutative A-algebra, C, and a nilpotent ideal , any A-algebra homomorphism may be lifted to an A-algebra map . If moreover any such lifting is unique, then f is said to be formally étale.[1][2]
Formally smooth maps were defined by Alexander Grothendieck in Éléments de géométrie algébrique IV.
For finitely presented morphisms, formal smoothness is equivalent to usual notion of smoothness.
Examples
[edit | edit source]Smooth morphisms
[edit | edit source]All smooth morphisms are equivalent to morphisms locally of finite presentation which are formally smooth. Hence formal smoothness is a slight generalization of smooth morphisms.[3]
Non-example
[edit | edit source]One method for detecting formal smoothness of a scheme is using infinitesimal lifting criterion. For example, using the truncation morphism
the infinitesimal lifting criterion can be described using the commutative square
where
. For example, if
and
then consider the tangent vector at the origin
given by the ring morphism
sending
Note because
, this is a valid morphism of commutative rings. Then, since a lifting of this morphism to
is of the form
and
, there cannot be an infinitesimal lift since this is non-zero, hence
is not formally smooth. This also proves this morphism is not smooth from the equivalence between formally smooth morphisms locally of finite presentation and smooth morphisms.
See also
[edit | edit source]References
[edit | edit source]- ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
- ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
- ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
External links
[edit | edit source]- Formally smooth with smooth fibers, but not smooth https://mathoverflow.net/q/333596
- Formally smooth but not smooth https://mathoverflow.net/q/195