First-order second-moment method

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

In probability theory, the first-order second-moment (FOSM) method, also referenced as mean value first-order second-moment (MVFOSM) method, is a probabilistic method to determine the stochastic moments of a function with random input variables. The name is based on the derivation, which uses a first-order Taylor series and the first and second moments of the input variables.[1]

Approximation

[edit | edit source]

Consider the objective function g(x), where the input vector x is a realization of the random vector X with probability density function fX(x). Because X is randomly distributed, g is also randomly distributed. Following the FOSM method, the mean value of g is approximated by

μgg(μ)

The variance of g is approximated by

σg2i=1nj=1ng(μ)xig(μ)xjcov(Xi,Xj)

where n is the length/dimension of x and g(μ)xi is the partial derivative of g at the mean vector μ with respect to the i-th entry of x. More accurate, second-order second-moment approximations are also available [2]

Derivation

[edit | edit source]

The objective function is approximated by a Taylor series at the mean vector μ.

g(x)=g(μ)+i=1ng(μ)xi(xiμi)+12i=1nj=1n2g(μ)xixj(xiμi)(xjμj)+

The mean value of g is given by the integral

μg=E[g(x)]=g(x)fX(x)dx

Inserting the first-order Taylor series yields

μg[g(μ)+i=1ng(μ)xi(xiμi)]fX(x)dx=g(μ)fX(x)dx+i=1ng(μ)xi(xiμi)fX(x)dx=g(μ)fX(x)dx1+i=1ng(μ)xi(xiμi)fX(x)dx0=g(μ).

The variance of g is given by the integral

σg2=E([g(x)μg]2)=[g(x)μg]2fX(x)dx.

According to the computational formula for the variance, this can be written as

σg2=E([g(x)μg]2)=E(g(x)2)μg2=g(x)2fX(x)dxμg2

Inserting the Taylor series yields

σg2[g(μ)+i=1ng(μ)xi(xiμi)]2fX(x)dxμg2={g(μ)2+2gμi=1ng(μ)xi(xiμi)+[i=1ng(μ)xi(xiμi)]2}fX(x)dxμg2=g(μ)2fX(x)dx+2gμi=1ng(μ)xi(xiμi)fX(x)dx+[i=1ng(μ)xi(xiμi)]2fX(x)dxμg2=gμ2fX(x)dx1+2gμi=1ng(μ)xi(xiμi)fX(x)dx0+[i=1nj=1ng(μ)xig(μ)xj(xiμi)(xjμj)]fX(x)dxμg2=g(μ)2μg2+i=1nj=1ng(μ)xig(μ)xj(xiμi)(xjμj)fX(x)dxcov(Xi,Xj)μg2=i=1nj=1ng(μ)xig(μ)xjcov(Xi,Xj).

Higher-order approaches

[edit | edit source]

The following abbreviations are introduced.

gμ=g(μ),g,i=g(μ)xi,g,ij=2g(μ)xixj,μi,j=E[(xiμi)j]

In the following, the entries of the random vector X are assumed to be independent. Considering also the second-order terms of the Taylor expansion, the approximation of the mean value is given by

μggμ+12i=1ng,iiμi,2

The incomplete second-order approximation (ISOA[3]) of the variance is given by

σg2gμ2+i=1ng,i2μi,2+14i=1ng,ii2μi,4+gμi=1ng,iiμi,2+i=1ng,ig,iiμi,3+12i=1nj=i+1ng,iig,jjμi,2μj,2+i=1nj=i+1ng,ij2μi,2μj,2μg2

The skewness of g can be determined from the third central moment μg,3. When considering only linear terms of the Taylor series, but higher-order moments, the third central moment is approximated by

μg,3i=1ng,i3μi,3

For the second-order approximations of the third central moment as well as for the derivation of all higher-order approximations see Appendix D of Ref.[3] Taking into account the quadratic terms of the Taylor series and the third moments of the input variables is referred to as second-order third-moment method.[4] However, the full second-order approach of the variance (given above) also includes fourth-order moments of input parameters,[5] the full second-order approach of the skewness 6th-order moments,[3][6] and the full second-order approach of the kurtosis up to 8th-order moments.[6]

Practical application

[edit | edit source]

There are several examples in the literature where the FOSM method is employed to estimate the stochastic distribution of the buckling load of axially compressed structures (see e.g. Ref.[7][8][9][10]). For structures which are very sensitive to deviations from the ideal structure (like cylindrical shells) it has been proposed to use the FOSM method as a design approach. Often the applicability is checked by comparison with a Monte Carlo simulation. Two comprehensive application examples of the full second-order method specifically oriented towards the fatigue crack growth in a metal railway axle are discussed and checked by comparison with a Monte Carlo simulation in Ref.[5][6]

In engineering practice, the objective function often is not given as analytic expression, but for instance as a result of a finite-element simulation. Then the derivatives of the objective function need to be estimated by the central differences method. The number of evaluations of the objective function equals 2n+1. Depending on the number of random variables this still can mean a significantly smaller number of evaluations than performing a Monte Carlo simulation. However, when using the FOSM method as a design procedure, a lower bound shall be estimated, which is actually not given by the FOSM approach. Therefore, a type of distribution needs to be assumed for the distribution of the objective function, taking into account the approximated mean value and standard deviation.

References

[edit | edit source]
  1. ^ A. Haldar and S. Mahadevan, Probability, Reliability, and Statistical Methods in Engineering Design. John Wiley & Sons New York/Chichester, UK, 2000.
  2. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  3. ^ a b c B. Kriegesmann, "Probabilistic Design of Thin-Walled Fiber Composite Structures", Mitteilungen des Instituts für Statik und Dynamik der Leibniz Universität Hannover 15/2012, Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value)., Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Universität Hannover, Hannover, Germany, 2012, PDF; 10,2MB.
  4. ^ Y. J. Hong, J. Xing, and J. B. Wang, "A Second-Order Third-Moment Method for Calculating the Reliability of Fatigue", Int. J. Press. Vessels Pip., 76 (8), pp 567–570, 1999.
  5. ^ a b Mallor C, Calvo S, Núñez JL, Rodríguez-Barrachina R, Landaberea A. "Full second-order approach for expected value and variance prediction of probabilistic fatigue crack growth life." International Journal of Fatigue 2020;133:105454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.105454.
  6. ^ a b c Mallor C, Calvo S, Núñez JL, Rodríguez-Barrachina R, Landaberea A. "Uncertainty propagation using the full second-order approach for probabilistic fatigue crack growth life." International Journal of Numerical Methods for Calculation and Design in Engineering (RIMNI) 2020:11. https://doi.org/10.23967/j.rimni.2020.07.004.
  7. ^ I. Elishakoff, S. van Manen, P. G. Vermeulen, and J. Arbocz, "First-Order Second-Moment Analysis of the Buckling of Shells with Random Imperfections", AIAA J., 25 (8), pp 1113–1117, 1987.
  8. ^ I. Elishakoff, "Uncertain Buckling: Its Past, Present and Future", Int. J. Solids Struct., 37 (46–47), pp 6869–6889, Nov. 2000.
  9. ^ J. Arbocz and M. W. Hilburger, "Toward a Probabilistic Preliminary Design Criterion for Buckling Critical Composite Shells", AIAA J., 43 (8), pp 1823–1827, 2005.
  10. ^ B. Kriegesmann, R. Rolfes, C. Hühne, and A. Kling, "Fast Probabilistic Design Procedure for Axially Compressed Composite Cylinders", Compos. Struct., 93, pp 3140–3149, 2011.