Extremal orders of an arithmetic function

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The extremal orders of an arithmetic function in number theory, a branch of mathematics, are the best possible bounds of the given arithmetic function. Specifically, if f(n) is an arithmetic function and m(n) is a non-decreasing function that is ultimately positive and

lim infnf(n)m(n)=1

we say that m is a minimal order for f. Similarly if M(n) is a non-decreasing function that is ultimately positive and

lim supnf(n)M(n)=1

we say that M is a maximal order for f.[1]: 80  Here, lim infn and lim supn denote the limit inferior and limit superior, respectively.

The subject was first studied systematically by Ramanujan starting in 1915.[1]: 87 

Examples

[edit | edit source]
  • For the sum-of-divisors function σ(n) we have the trivial result lim infnσ(n)n=1 because always σ(n) ≥ n and for primes σ(p) = p + 1. We also have lim supnσ(n)nlnlnn=eγ, proved by Gronwall in 1913.[1]: 86 [2]: Theorem 323 [3] Therefore n is a minimal order and e−γ n ln ln n is a maximal order for σ(n).
  • For the Euler totient φ(n) we have the trivial result lim supnϕ(n)n=1 because always φ(n) ≤ n and for primes φ(p) = p − 1. We also have lim infnϕ(n)lnlnnn=eγ, proven by Landau in 1903.[1]: 84 [2]: Theorem 328 
  • For the number of divisors function d(n) we have the trivial lower bound 2 ≤ d(n), in which equality occurs when n is prime, so 2 is a minimal order. For ln d(n) we have a maximal order ln 2 ln n / ln ln n, proved by Wigert in 1907.[1]: 82 [2]: Theorem 317 
  • For the number of distinct prime factors ω(n) we have a trivial lower bound 1 ≤ ω(n), in which equality occurs when n is a prime power. A maximal order for ω(n) is ln n / ln ln n.[1]: 83 
  • For the number of prime factors counted with multiplicity Ω(n) we have a trivial lower bound 1 ≤ Ω(n), in which equality occurs when n is prime. A maximal order for Ω(n) is ln n / ln 2[1]: 83 
  • It is conjectured that the Mertens function, or summatory function of the Möbius function, satisfies lim supn|M(x)|x=+, though to date this limit superior has only been shown to be larger than a small constant. This statement is compared with the disproof of Mertens conjecture given by Odlyzko and te Riele in their several decades old breakthrough paper Disproof of the Mertens Conjecture. In contrast, we note that while extensive computational evidence suggests that the above conjecture is true, i.e., along some increasing sequence of {xn}n1 tending to infinity the average order of xn|M(xn)| grows unbounded, that the Riemann hypothesis is equivalent to the limit limxM(x)/x12+ε=0 being true for all (sufficiently small) ε>0.

See also

[edit | edit source]

Notes

[edit | edit source]
  1. ^ a b c d e f g Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  2. ^ a b c Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  3. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).

Further reading

[edit | edit source]
  • Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value). A survey of extremal orders, with an extensive bibliography.