Eucryphia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Eucryphia
File:Eucryphia cordifolia Flor del ulmo (RastaChango).jpg
Eucryphia cordifolia, South America
File:Eucryphia lucida (Leatherwood) flower.jpg
Eucryphia lucida, Tasmania, Australia
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Plantae
Clade: Tracheophytes
Clade: Angiosperms
Clade: Eudicots
Clade: Rosids
Order: Oxalidales
Family: Cunoniaceae
Genus: Eucryphia
Cav.
Type species
Eucryphia cordifolia
Cav.[1] (1798)
Species

See text

Synonyms[2]

Eucryphia is a small genus of trees and large shrubs native to the south temperate regions of South America and coastal eastern Australia, mainly Tasmania. Sometimes placed in a family of their own, the Eucryphiaceae, they are placed by more recent classifications in the Cunoniaceae. There are seven species,[2] two in South America and five in Australia, and several named hybrids.

Description

[edit | edit source]

They are mostly evergreen though one species (E. glutinosa) is usually deciduous.[3]

The leaves are opposite, and either simple or pinnate with 3–13 leaflets. The flowers are produced in late summer or autumn, are showy and sweetly scented, 3–6 cm (1.2–2.4 in) diameter, with four creamy-white petals, and numerous stamens and styles. The fruit is a woody capsule 1–1.5 cm (0.4–0.6 in) long containing several seeds, and maturing in 12–15 months.

Etymology

[edit | edit source]

The generic name Eucryphia is composed of two parts, namely eu- and -cryphia. The Greek ευ-κρυφαιος means well-covered and refers to the foliage, which is clustered towards the apex of branches.[4]

Species

[edit | edit source]

Extant species

[edit | edit source]

Extinct species

[edit | edit source]

Natural hybrids

[edit | edit source]

There are two known natural hybrids, although additional, artificial hybrids have been created. However, these are not naturally occurring.

Artificial hybrids and cultivars

[edit | edit source]

(those marked agm have gained the Royal Horticultural Society's Award of Garden Merit)[10]

  • E. × intermedia (E. glutinosa × E. lucida)
    • E. × intermedia 'Rostrevor'agm[11]
  • E. × hillieri (E. moorei × E. lucida): Developed from a self-sown seedling at the nursery of Hillier & Sons, Chandlers Ford in Hampshire around 1953.[12]
  • E. × nymansensis (E. cordifolia × E. glutinosa)
    • E. × nymansensis 'Nymansay'agm[13] originated from Lt. Col. Leonard C.R. Messel's garden at Nymans, Sussex (1913)[12]
    • E. × nymansensis 'Nymans Silver' is a sport discovered at Nymans, Sussex in 2005. It is a variegated form with serrated oval leaves that are outlined in creamy white. It was discovered growing on a E. × nymansensis within the garden. It is considered to be faster growing and more columnar in nature. The name 'Nymans Silver' was proposed by Philip Holmes, Deputy Head Gardener at Nymans.' [1]
  • E. 'Penwith' (E. cordifolia × E. lucida)
  • E. × hybrida (E. glutinosa × E. lucida)

The species and their hybrids are attractive small trees for gardens, typically with a slender conic crown when young, though widening with age. They are valued for their conspicuous scented flowers, produced in late summer and autumn when few or no other trees are in flower. Cultivation is restricted to areas with mild winters, cool summers and good rainfall; away from their native areas, this restricts them to the Atlantic coastal regions of Europe, the Pacific Northwest of North America, and New Zealand.

Honey

[edit | edit source]

The nectar of two of the species provides an important sources of honey. Eucryphia lucida from Tasmania is the main source of a very distinctively flavoured honey known as Leatherwood (the common name for the species). Some of this honey may come from the other Tasmanian species, E. milliganii. In Chile, Ulmo honey (again after the local species name) comes from E. cordifolia. Leatherwood honey and Ulmo honey are very similar in flavour, even though the two species have probably been separated for more than 45 million years.

References

[edit | edit source]
  1. ^ Bausch, J. (1938). "A revision of the Eucryphiaceae." Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew), 1938(8), 317-349.
  2. ^ a b Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  3. ^ Alvarez, C., Acevedo Tapia, M. A., González Ortega, M. P., Dumroese, R. K., Cartes Rodríguez, E. J., & Quiroz Marchant, I. (2019). "Field Establishment Techniques for Guindo Santo, an Endemic Species from Central Chile."
  4. ^ Gledhill, D. (2008). "The Names of Plants." p. 159. Cambridge University Press.
  5. ^ a b c Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  6. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  7. ^ a b c Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  8. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  9. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  10. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  11. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  12. ^ a b Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  13. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
[edit | edit source]

Lua error in Module:Taxonbar at line 165: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value). Lua error in Module:Authority_control at line 153: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).