Draft:Griffith (unit)
This article, Draft:Griffith (unit), has recently been created via the Articles for creation process. Please check to see if the reviewer has accidentally left this template after accepting the draft and take appropriate action as necessary.
Reviewer tools: Preload talk Inform author |
This article, Draft:Griffith (unit), has recently been created via the Articles for creation process. Please check to see if the reviewer has accidentally left this template after accepting the draft and take appropriate action as necessary.
Reviewer tools: Preload talk Inform author |
- File:Symbol opinion vote.svg Comment: I'm only seeing trivial footnote mentions in the sourcing. The source that is to an online comment is an unreliable source, and the definition and usage sections currently are in need of sourcing. đžwasianpowerđž (talk âą contribs) 03:37, 17 December 2025 (UTC)
The griffith (symbol: Gf) is a proposed non-SI unit of the quantity expressed in pascalâmetre to the one-half (Pa·m1/2), used in the context of fracture mechanics to quantify material resistance to crack propagation. The unit was suggested as a tribute to the British mechanical engineer Alan Arnold Griffith (1893â1963), whose pioneering work laid the foundations of modern fracture mechanics.
Definition
[edit | edit source]The griffith is defined as:
This unit corresponds to the same dimensions as the classical expression of fracture toughness terms used in linear elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM), where stress-intensity factors are commonly expressed in Pa·m1/2.
Common multiple unit of the griffith is the megagriffith (1 MGf = 106 Gf).
Origin and Proposal
[edit | edit source]The use of the unit was originally suggested by Pedro Rivero-AntĂșnez et al.,[1], and Prof. C. Ramadas and Mr. A. R. Jadhav [2] as a more intuitive and less cumbersome alternative to the expression Pa·m1/2. Their proposal intended to honour A. A. Griffithâs seminal contributions to the understanding of stress concentration, crack initiation, and brittle fracture.
The first documented proposal of the term griffith in an official international scientific context appears in a 2020 article by Rivero-AntĂșnez et al..[1]. In this work, the authors adopted the designation âgriffithâ (Gf) for the unit Pa·m1/2 when reporting fracture-related mechanical properties of alumina-based ceramics. According to the authors, their literature search revealed one earlier public discussion on the website iMechanica[2], where the possibility of naming the fracture toughness unit had been debated. Since then, it has been used in some other articles published at international journals [3][4][5]
Historical Background
[edit | edit source]The unit is named after Alan Arnold Griffith, who introduced the energy-based approach to fracture and established the relationship between crack size, applied stress, and failure in brittle solids. His classical 1921 paper, The Phenomena of Rupture and Flow in Solids, is recognized as one of the foundational works of modern fracture mechanics..[6]
Usage
[edit | edit source]Although the griffith is not an SI unit and is not formally recognized by standards organizations, it has been proposed as a convenient shorthand within the fracture mechanics community, particularly in scientific publications dealing with the mechanical characterization of brittle materials.
See also
[edit | edit source]- Fracture mechanics
- Fracture toughness
- Stress intensity factor
- Alan Arnold Griffith
- Linear elastic fracture mechanics
References
[edit | edit source]- ^ a b P. Rivero-AntĂșnez, R. Cano-Crespo, L. Esquivias, N. de la Rosa-Fox, C. Zamora-Ledezma, A. DomĂnguez-RodrĂguez, V. Morales-FlĂłrez, "Mechanical characterization of solâgel alumina-based ceramics with intragranular reinforcement of multiwalled carbon nanotubes," Ceramics International, vol. 46, 2020, pp. 19723â19730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.04.285
- ^ a b Jadhav, Ajit R. (2007, 6 August). âNaming the SI Unit for Fracture Toughness (KIC)â. iMechanica â the web of mechanics and mechanicians. https://imechanica.org/comment/30363#comment-30363.
- ^ P. Rivero-AntĂșnez, R. Cano-Crespo, F. SĂĄnchez-Bajo, A. DomĂnguez-RodrĂguez, V. Morales-FlĂłrez, "Reactive SPS for solâgel alumina samples: Structure, sintering behavior, and mechanical properties", Journal of the European Ceramic Society, vol. 41, no. 11, 2021, pp. 5548â5557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2021.04.060
- ^ P. Rivero-AntĂșnez, V. Morales-FlĂłrez, F. L. Cumbrera, L. Esquivias, "Rietveld analysis and mechanical properties of in situ formed La-ÎČ-Al2O3/Al2O3 composites prepared by sol-gel method", Ceramics International, vol. 48, no. 17, 2022, pp. 24462â24470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.05.058
- ^ P. Rivero-AntĂșnez, C. Zamora-Ledezma, F. SĂĄnchez-Bajo, J. C. Moreno-LĂłpez, E. Anglaret, V. Morales-FlĂłrez, "Solâgel method and reactive SPS for novel aluminaâgraphene ceramic composites", Journal of the European Ceramic Society, vol. 43, no. 3, 2023, pp. 1064â1077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2022.10.043
- ^ Griffith, A. A., "The Phenomena of Rupture and Flow in Solids," Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 221, 1921, pp. 163â198.