Distinction without a difference

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

A distinction without a difference is a type of logical fallacy where an author or speaker attempts to describe a distinction between two things where no discernible difference exists.[1] It is particularly used when a word or phrase has connotations associated with it that one party to an argument prefers to avoid.

For example, a person might say "I did not lie; I merely stretched the truth a little bit."[2]

Form of the fallacy

[edit | edit source]
  • Claim X is made where the truth of the claim requires a distinct difference between A and B.
  • There is no distinct difference between A and B.
  • Therefore, claim X is incorrectly claimed to be true.

Example

[edit | edit source]

In the following conversation:

  • Sergio: There is no way I would ever even consider taking dancing lessons.
  • Kitty: How about I ask my friend from work to teach you?
  • Sergio: If you know someone who is willing to teach me how to dance, then I am willing to learn, sure.[3]

Sergio's fallacy is thinking that being taught by someone is different than taking a lesson.

See also

[edit | edit source]

References

[edit | edit source]
  1. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  2. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  3. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).