Distance-transitive graph

The Biggs-Smith graph, the largest 3-regular distance-transitive graph.

Graph families defined by their automorphisms
distance-transitive	→	distance-regular	←	strongly regular
↓
symmetric (arc-transitive)	←	t-transitive, t ≥ 2		skew-symmetric
↓
(if connected) vertex- and edge-transitive	→	edge-transitive and regular	→	edge-transitive
↓		↓		↓
vertex-transitive	→	regular	→	(if bipartite) biregular
↑
Cayley graph	←	zero-symmetric		asymmetric

In the mathematical field of graph theory, a distance-transitive graph is a graph such that, given any two vertices v and w at any distance i, and any other two vertices x and y at the same distance, there is an automorphism of the graph that carries v to x and w to y. Distance-transitive graphs were first defined in 1971 by Norman L. Biggs and D. H. Smith.

A distance-transitive graph is interesting partly because it has a large automorphism group. Some interesting finite groups are the automorphism groups of distance-transitive graphs, especially of those whose diameter is 2.

Examples

Some first examples of families of distance-transitive graphs include:

• The Johnson graphs.
• The Grassmann graphs.
• The Hamming Graphs (including Hypercube graphs).
• The folded cube graphs.
• The square rook's graphs.
• The Livingstone graph.

Classification of cubic distance-transitive graphs

After introducing them in 1971, Biggs and Smith showed that there are only 12 finite connected trivalent distance-transitive graphs. These are:

Graph name	Vertex count	Diameter	Girth	Intersection array
Tetrahedral graph or complete graph K4	4	1	3	{3;1}
complete bipartite graph K3,3	6	2	4	{3,2;1,3}
Petersen graph	10	2	5	{3,2;1,1}
Cubical graph	8	3	4	{3,2,1;1,2,3}
Heawood graph	14	3	6	{3,2,2;1,1,3}
Pappus graph	18	4	6	{3,2,2,1;1,1,2,3}
Coxeter graph	28	4	7	{3,2,2,1;1,1,1,2}
Tutte–Coxeter graph	30	4	8	{3,2,2,2;1,1,1,3}
Dodecahedral graph	20	5	5	{3,2,1,1,1;1,1,1,2,3}
Desargues graph	20	5	6	{3,2,2,1,1;1,1,2,2,3}
Biggs-Smith graph	102	7	9	{3,2,2,2,1,1,1;1,1,1,1,1,1,3}
Foster graph	90	8	10	{3,2,2,2,2,1,1,1;1,1,1,1,2,2,2,3}

Relation to distance-regular graphs

Every distance-transitive graph is distance-regular, but the converse is not necessarily true.

In 1969, before publication of the Biggs–Smith definition, a Russian group led by Georgy Adelson-Velsky showed that there exist graphs that are distance-regular but not distance-transitive. The smallest distance-regular graph that is not distance-transitive is the Shrikhande graph, with 16 vertices and degree 6. The only graph of this type with degree three is the 126-vertex Tutte 12-cage. Complete lists of distance-transitive graphs are known for some degrees larger than three, but the classification of distance-transitive graphs with arbitrarily large vertex degree remains open.

References

Early works

• .
• .
• .
• .
• .

Surveys

• , chapter 20.
• .
• , chapter 7.
• .
• , section 4.5.
• .