Descriptive set theory

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

In mathematical logic, descriptive set theory (DST) is the study of certain classes of "well-behaved" subsets of the real line and other Polish spaces. As well as being one of the primary areas of research in set theory, it has applications to other areas of mathematics such as functional analysis, ergodic theory, the study of operator algebras and group actions, and mathematical logic.

Polish spaces

[edit | edit source]

Descriptive set theory begins with the study of Polish spaces and their Borel sets.

A Polish space is a second-countable topological space that is metrizable with a complete metric. Heuristically, it is a complete separable metric space whose metric has been "forgotten". Examples include the real line , the Baire space 𝒩, the Cantor space 𝒞, and the Hilbert cube I.

Universality properties

[edit | edit source]

The class of Polish spaces has several universality properties, which show that there is no loss of generality in considering Polish spaces of certain restricted forms.

  • Every Polish space is homeomorphic to a Gδ subspace of the Hilbert cube, and every Gδ subspace of the Hilbert cube is Polish.
  • Every Polish space is obtained as a continuous image of Baire space; in fact every Polish space is the image of a continuous bijection defined on a closed subset of Baire space. Similarly, every compact Polish space is a continuous image of Cantor space.

Because of these universality properties, and because the Baire space 𝒩 has the convenient property that it is homeomorphic to 𝒩ω, many results in descriptive set theory are proved in the context of Baire space alone.

Borel sets

[edit | edit source]

The class of Borel sets of a topological space X consists of all sets in the smallest σ-algebra containing the open sets of X. This means that the Borel sets of X are the smallest collection of sets such that:

  • Every open subset of X is a Borel set.
  • If A is a Borel set, so is XA. That is, the class of Borel sets are closed under complementation.
  • If An is a Borel set for each natural number n, then the union An is a Borel set. That is, the Borel sets are closed under countable unions.

A fundamental result shows that any two uncountable Polish spaces X and Y are Borel isomorphic: there is a bijection from X to Y such that the preimage of any Borel set is Borel, and the image of any Borel set is Borel. This gives additional justification to the practice of restricting attention to Baire space and Cantor space, since these and any other Polish spaces are all isomorphic at the level of Borel sets.

Borel hierarchy

[edit | edit source]

Each Borel set of a Polish space is classified in the Borel hierarchy based on how many times the operations of countable union and complementation must be used to obtain the set, beginning from open sets. The classification is in terms of countable ordinal numbers. For each nonzero countable ordinal α there are classes 𝜮α0, 𝜫α0, and 𝜟α0.

  • Every open set is declared to be 𝜮10.
  • A set is declared to be 𝜫α0 if and only if its complement is 𝜮α0.
  • A set A is declared to be 𝜮δ0, δ > 1, if there is a sequence ⟨ Ai ⟩ of sets, each of which is 𝜫λ(i)0 for some λ(i) < δ, such that A=Ai.
  • A set is 𝜟α0 if and only if it is both 𝜮α0 and 𝜫α0.

A theorem shows that any set that is 𝜮α0 or 𝜫α0 is 𝜟α+10, and any 𝜟β0 set is both 𝜮α0 and 𝜫α0 for all α > β. Thus the hierarchy has the following structure, where arrows indicate inclusion.

𝜮10𝜮20𝜟10𝜟20𝜫10𝜫20𝜮α0𝜟α0𝜟α+10𝜫α0

Regularity properties of Borel sets

[edit | edit source]

Classical descriptive set theory includes the study of regularity properties of Borel sets. For example, all Borel sets of a Polish space have the property of Baire and the perfect set property. Modern descriptive set theory includes the study of the ways in which these results generalize, or fail to generalize, to other classes of subsets of Polish spaces.

Analytic and coanalytic sets

[edit | edit source]

Just beyond the Borel sets in complexity are the analytic sets and coanalytic sets. A subset of a Polish space X is analytic if it is the continuous image of a Borel subset of some other Polish space. Although any continuous preimage of a Borel set is Borel, not all analytic sets are Borel sets. A set is coanalytic if its complement is analytic.

Projective sets and Wadge degrees

[edit | edit source]

Many questions in descriptive set theory ultimately depend upon set-theoretic considerations and the properties of ordinal and cardinal numbers. This phenomenon is particularly apparent in the projective sets. These are defined via the projective hierarchy on a Polish space X:

  • A set is declared to be 𝜮11 if it is analytic.
  • A set is 𝜫11 if it is coanalytic.
  • A set A is 𝜮n+11 if there is a 𝜫n1 subset B of X×X such that A is the projection of B to the first coordinate.
  • A set A is 𝜫n+11 if there is a 𝜮n1 subset B of X×X such that A is the projection of B to the first coordinate.
  • A set is 𝜟n1 if it is both 𝜫n1 and 𝜮n1 .

As with the Borel hierarchy, for each n, any 𝜟n1 set is both 𝜮n+11 and 𝜫n+11.

The properties of the projective sets are not completely determined by ZFC. Under the assumption V = L, not all projective sets have the perfect set property or the property of Baire. However, under the assumption of projective determinacy, all projective sets have both the perfect set property and the property of Baire. This is related to the fact that ZFC proves Borel determinacy, but not projective determinacy.

There are also generic extensions of L for any natural number n>2 in which 𝒫(ω)L consists of all the lightface Δn1 subsets of ω.[1]

More generally, the entire collection of sets of elements of a Polish space X can be grouped into equivalence classes, known as Wadge degrees, that generalize the projective hierarchy. These degrees are ordered in the Wadge hierarchy. The axiom of determinacy implies that the Wadge hierarchy on any Polish space is well-founded and of length Θ, with structure extending the projective hierarchy.

Borel equivalence relations

[edit | edit source]

A contemporary area of research in descriptive set theory studies Borel equivalence relations. A Borel equivalence relation on a Polish space X is a Borel subset of X×X that is an equivalence relation on X.

Effective descriptive set theory

[edit | edit source]

The area of effective descriptive set theory combines the methods of descriptive set theory with those of generalized recursion theory (especially hyperarithmetical theory). In particular, it focuses on lightface analogues of hierarchies of classical descriptive set theory. Thus the hyperarithmetic hierarchy is studied instead of the Borel hierarchy, and the analytical hierarchy instead of the projective hierarchy. This research is related to weaker versions of set theory such as Kripke–Platek set theory and second-order arithmetic.

Table

[edit | edit source]
Lightface Boldface
Σ0
0
= Π0
0
= Δ0
0
(sometimes the same as Δ0
1
)
Σ0
0
= Π0
0
= Δ0
0
(if defined)
Δ0
1
= recursive
Δ0
1
= clopen
Σ0
1
= recursively enumerable
Π0
1
= co-recursively enumerable
Σ0
1
= G = open
Π0
1
= F = closed
Δ0
2
Δ0
2
Σ0
2
Π0
2
Σ0
2
= Fσ
Π0
2
= Gδ
Δ0
3
Δ0
3
Σ0
3
Π0
3
Σ0
3
= Gδσ
Π0
3
= Fσδ
Σ0
= Π0
= Δ0
= Σ1
0
= Π1
0
= Δ1
0
= arithmetical
Σ0
= Π0
= Δ0
= Σ1
0
= Π1
0
= Δ1
0
= boldface arithmetical
Δ0
α
recursive)
Δ0
α
countable)
Σ0
α
Π0
α
Σ0
α
Π0
α
Σ0
ωCK
1
= Π0
ωCK
1
= Δ0
ωCK
1
= Δ1
1
= hyperarithmetical
Σ0
ω1
= Π0
ω1
= Δ0
ω1
= Δ1
1
= B = Borel
Σ1
1
= lightface analytic
Π1
1
= lightface coanalytic
Σ1
1
= A = analytic
Π1
1
= CA = coanalytic
Δ1
2
Δ1
2
Σ1
2
Π1
2
Σ1
2
= PCA
Π1
2
= CPCA
Δ1
3
Δ1
3
Σ1
3
Π1
3
Σ1
3
= PCPCA
Π1
3
= CPCPCA
Σ1
= Π1
= Δ1
= Σ2
0
= Π2
0
= Δ2
0
= analytical
Σ1
= Π1
= Δ1
= Σ2
0
= Π2
0
= Δ2
0
= P = projective

See also

[edit | edit source]

References

[edit | edit source]
  • Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  • Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  • Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).

Citations

[edit | edit source]
  1. ^ V. Kanovei, V. Lyubetsky, "On the Δn1 problem of Harvey Friedman. In Mathematical Logic and its Applications (2020), DOI 10.3380/math8091477.
[edit | edit source]