Complex Wishart distribution

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Complex Wishart
Notation A ~ CWp(Γ, n)
Parameters n > p − 1 degrees of freedom (real)
Γ > 0 (p × p Hermitian pos. def)
Support A (p × p) Hermitian positive definite matrix
PDF

det(𝐀)(np)etr(𝜞1𝐀)det(𝜞)n𝒞Γ~p(n)

Mean E[A]=nΓ
Mode (np)𝜞 for np + 1
CF det(Ipi𝜞𝜣)n

In statistics, the complex Wishart distribution is a complex version of the Wishart distribution. It is the distribution of n times the sample Hermitian covariance matrix of n zero-mean independent Gaussian random variables. It has support for p×p Hermitian positive definite matrices.[1]

The complex Wishart distribution is also encountered in wireless communications, while analyzing the performance of Rayleigh fading MIMO wireless channels.[2]

The complex Wishart distribution is the density of a complex-valued sample covariance matrix. Let

Sp×p=i=1nGiGiH

where each Gi is an independent column p-vector of random complex Gaussian zero-mean samples and (.)H is an Hermitian (complex conjugate) transpose. If the covariance of G is 𝔼[GGH]=M then

Sn𝒞𝒲(M,n,p)

where 𝒞𝒲(M,n,p) is the complex central Wishart distribution with n degrees of freedom and mean value, or scale matrix, M.

fS(𝐒)=|𝐒|npetr(𝐌1𝐒)|𝐌|n𝒞Γ~p(n),np,|𝐌|>0

where

𝒞Γ~p(n)=πp(p1)/2j=1pΓ(nj+1)

is the complex multivariate Gamma function.[3]

Using the trace rotation rule tr(ABC)=tr(CAB) we also get

fS(𝐒)=|𝐒|np|𝐌|n𝒞Γ~p(n)exp(i=1pGiH𝐌1Gi)

which is quite close to the complex multivariate pdf of G itself. The elements of G conventionally have circular symmetry such that 𝔼[GGT]=0.

Inverse Complex Wishart The distribution of the inverse complex Wishart distribution of 𝐘=𝐒𝟏 according to Goodman,[3] Shaman[4] is

fY(𝐘)=|𝐘|(n+p)etr(𝐌𝐘𝟏)|𝐌|n𝒞Γ~p(n),np,det(𝐘)>0

where 𝐌=𝜞𝟏.

If derived via a matrix inversion mapping, the result depends on the complex Jacobian determinant

𝒞JY(Y1)=|Y|2p

Goodman and others[5] discuss such complex Jacobians.

Eigenvalues

[edit | edit source]

The probability distribution of the eigenvalues of the complex Hermitian Wishart distribution are given by, for example, James[6] and Edelman.[7] For a p×p matrix with νp degrees of freedom we have

f(λ1λp)=K~ν,pexp(12i=1pλi)i=1pλiνpi<j(λiλj)2dλ1dλp,λi0

where

K~ν,p1=2pνi=1pΓ(νi+1)Γ(pi+1)

Note however that Edelman uses the "mathematical" definition of a complex normal variable Z=X+iY where iid X and Y each have unit variance and the variance of Z=𝐄(X2+Y2)=2. For the definition more common in engineering circles, with X and Y each having 0.5 variance, the eigenvalues are reduced by a factor of 2.

This spectral density can be integrated to give the probability that all eigenvalues of a Wishart random matrix lie within an interval.[8]

The spectral density can be also integrated to give the marginal distribution of eigenvalues.[9] [10]

There are also approximations for marginal eigenvalue distributions. From Edelman we have that if S is a sample from the complex Wishart distribution with p=κν,0κ1 such that Sp×p𝒞𝒲(2𝐈,pκ) then in the limit p the distribution of eigenvalues converges in probability to the Marchenko–Pastur distribution function

pλ(λ)=[λ/2(κ1)2][κ+1)2λ/2]4πκ(λ/2),2(κ1)2λ2(κ+1)2,0κ1

This distribution becomes identical to the real Wishart case, by replacing λ by 2λ, on account of the doubled sample variance, so in the case Sp×p𝒞𝒲(𝐈,pκ), the pdf reduces to the real Wishart one:

pλ(λ)=[λ(κ1)2][κ+1)2λ]2πκλ,(κ1)2λ(κ+1)2,0κ1

A special case is κ=1

pλ(λ)=14π(8λλ)12,0λ8

or, if a Var(Z) = 1 convention is used then

pλ(λ)=12π(4λλ)12,0λ4.

The Wigner semicircle distribution arises by making the change of variable y=±λ in the latter and selecting the sign of y randomly yielding pdf

py(y)=12π(4y2)12,2y2

In place of the definition of the Wishart sample matrix above, Sp×p=j=1νGjGjH, we can define a Gaussian ensemble

𝐆i,j=[G1Gν]p×ν

such that S is the matrix product S=𝐆𝐆𝐇. The real non-negative eigenvalues of S are then the modulus-squared singular values of the ensemble 𝐆 and the moduli of the latter have a quarter-circle distribution.

In the case κ>1 such that ν<p then S is rank deficient with at least pν null eigenvalues. However the singular values of 𝐆 are invariant under transposition so, redefining S~=𝐆𝐇𝐆, then S~ν×ν has a complex Wishart distribution, has full rank almost certainly, and eigenvalue distributions can be obtained from S~ in lieu, using all the previous equations.

In cases where the columns of 𝐆 are not linearly independent and S~ν×ν remains singular, a QR decomposition can be used to reduce G to a product like

𝐆=Q[𝐑0]

such that 𝐑q×q,qν is upper triangular with full rank and S~~q×q=𝐑𝐇𝐑 has further reduced dimensionality.

The eigenvalues are of practical significance in radio communications theory since they define the Shannon channel capacity of a ν×p MIMO wireless channel which, to first approximation, is modeled as a zero-mean complex Gaussian ensemble.

References

[edit | edit source]
  1. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  2. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  3. ^ a b Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  4. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  5. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  6. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  7. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  8. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  9. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  10. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).