Body surface area

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

In physiology and medicine, the body surface area (BSA) is the measured or calculated surface area of a human body. For many clinical purposes, BSA is a better indicator of metabolic mass than body weight because it is less affected by abnormal adipose mass. Nevertheless, there have been several important critiques of the use of BSA in determining the dosage of medications with a narrow therapeutic index, such as chemotherapy.

Typically, there is a 4–10-fold variation in drug clearance between individuals due to differing the activity of drug elimination processes related to genetic and environmental factors. This can lead to significant overdosing and underdosing (and increased risk of disease recurrence). It is also thought to be a distorting factor in Phase I and II trials that may result in potentially helpful medications being prematurely rejected.[1][2] The trend to personalized medicine is one approach to counter this weakness.

Examples of uses of the BSA:

There is some evidence that BSA values are less accurate at extremes of height and weight, where Body Mass Index may be a better estimate (for hemodynamic parameters).[3]

Calculation

[edit | edit source]

Various calculations have been published to arrive at the BSA without direct measurement. In the following formulae, M is the subject's mass, and H is the subject's height.

The most widely used is the Du Bois formula,[4][5] which has been shown to be equally as effective in estimating body fat in obese and non-obese patients, something the Body mass index fails to do.[6]

BSA=a×M0.425×H0.725
where a=71.84cm1.275kg0.425

The Mosteller formula is also commonly used, and is mathematically simpler:[7]

BSA=bM×H
where b=10006cm1.5kg0.5

Other formulas for BSA include:

Haycock[8] c×M0.5378×H0.3964
Gehan and George[9]     d×M0.51456×H0.42246
Boyd [10] e×(M1kg)0.0188log10fM×H0.3
Fujimoto[11] g×M0.444×H0.663
Takahira[11] h×M0.425×H0.725
Shuter and Aslani[12] i×M0.441×H0.655
Lipscombe [13]     j×M0.434972×H0.67844
Schlich[14] k×M0.46×H1.08       (women)
l×M0.38×H1.24       (men)
where c=242.65cm1.6036kg0.5378, d=235cm1.57754kg0.51456, e=333cm1.7, f=100.61570.0188kg, g=88.83cm1.337kg0.556, h=72.41cm1.275kg0.425, i=94.9cm1.345kg0.441, j=87.8108cm1.32156kg0.434972, k=9.75482cm0.96kg0.46, and l=5.79479cm0.76kg0.38.

For any formula, the units should match. Lipscombe, following Mosteller's reasoning, observed that the formulas obtained by Fujimoto, Shuter and Aslani, Takahira, and Lipscombe are suggestive of m×M4/9×H2/3, where the coefficient m's numerical value is solely dependent on the density unit, specifically equal to 8009(kgcm3)49.

A weight-based formula that does not include a square root (making it easier to use) was proposed by Costeff and recently validated for the pediatric age group. It is n4M+oM+p, where n=1m2, o=7kg, and p=90kg.[15][16]

Average values

[edit | edit source]

Average BSA for children of various ages, for men, and for women, can be estimated using statistical survey data and a BSA formula:[17]

Mean male BSA by age
Age or age group metric imperial
Neonate (newborn) 0.243 m2 2.612 ft2
2 years 0.563 m2 6.060 ft2
5 years 0.787 m2 8.471 ft2
10 years 1.236 m2 13.304 ft2
13 years 1.603 m2 17.255 ft2
18 years 1.980 m2 21.313 ft2
20–79 years 2.060 m2 22.173 ft2
80+ years 1.920 m2 20.667 ft2
Mean female BSA by age
Age or age group metric imperial
Neonate (newborn) 0.234 m2 2.519 ft2
2 years 0.540 m2 5.813 ft2
5 years 0.771 m2 8.299 ft2
10 years 1.245 m2 13.401 ft2
13 years 1.550 m2 16.684 ft2
18 years 1.726 m2 18.579 ft2
20–79 years 1.830 m2 19.697 ft2
80+ years 1.638 m2 17.631 ft2

The estimations in the above tables are based weight and height data from the U.S. NCHS National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2011-2014).[18]

There was an average BSA of 1.73 m2 for 3,000 cancer patients from 1990 to 1998 in a European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) database.[19]

During 2005 there was an average BSA of 1.79 m2 for 3,613 adult cancer patients in the UK. Among them, the average BSA for men was 1.91 m2 and for women was 1.71 m2.[20]

See also

[edit | edit source]

References

[edit | edit source]
  1. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  2. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  3. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  4. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value). Reprinted in Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  5. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  6. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  7. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  8. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  9. ^ Gehan EA, George SL, Cancer Chemother Rep 1970, 54:225-235
  10. ^ Boyd, Edith (1935). The Growth of the Surface Area of the Human Body. University of Minnesota. The Institute of Child Welfare, Monograph Series, No. x. London: Oxford University Press.
  11. ^ a b Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  12. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  13. ^ Lipscombe, Trevor, Body Surface Area Formula by Use of Geometric Means Medicina Internacia Revuo 2020, 29 (114):11-18
  14. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  15. ^ Costeff H, "A simple empirical formula for calculating approximate surface area in children.," Arch Dis Child, vol. 41, no. 220, pp. 681–683, Dec. 1966.
  16. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  17. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  18. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  19. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  20. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).