MyWiki:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2017 February 2
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by imported>Scsbot at 02:26, 8 February 2017 (edited by robot: archiving February 2). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.Revision as of 02:26, 8 February 2017 by imported>Scsbot (edited by robot: archiving February 2)
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
This template must be substituted. Replace {{Archive header with {{subst:Archive header.
{| width = "100%"
|- ! colspan="3" align="center" | Help desk |- ! width="20%" align="left" | < February 1 ! width="25%" align="center"|<< Jan | February | Mar >> ! width="20%" align="right" |Current help desk > |}
| Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
|---|
| The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
Contents
February 2
[edit source]04:11:38, 2 February 2017 review of submission by 2600:8803:7A00:19:9D05:572F:5403:52C
[edit source]Can You create the 2017-18 NCAA bowl games article cause I think the error needs to be right.2600:8803:7A00:19:9D05:572F:5403:52C (talk) 04:11, 2 February 2017 (UTC) 2600:8803:7A00:19:9D05:572F:5403:52C (talk) 04:11, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- Assistance has been requested from the College Football project. For more detail, see the note at the top of the draft. NewYorkActuary (talk) 21:41, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
15:31:41, 2 February 2017 review of draft by Yourgirl
[edit source]How do i add the contents and images? Yourgirl (talk) 15:31, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- @Yourgirl: The table of contents appears automatically when sections are correctly formated. To demonstrate, I've reformatted the first three sections for you, using equals signs in the section headings. You can reformat the rest. Don't worry about images at this point, the rules for them are complex, and their presence or absence will have no effect on whether the draft is approved or not. The draft has bigger problems.
- Wikipedia does not normally list all of an academic's journal and conference papers, only their books, so half the contents of the draft should be removed. The three references are inadequate to support the remainder or to establish notability. Study WP:PROF carefully. Decide what criterion he satisfies, find the sources to prove it, and state it clearly in the draft. --Worldbruce (talk) 19:38, 4 February 2017 (UTC)