MyWiki:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2017 January 27
This template must be substituted. Replace {{Archive header with {{subst:Archive header.
|- ! colspan="3" align="center" | Help desk |- ! width="20%" align="left" | < January 26 ! width="25%" align="center"|<< Dec | January | Feb >> ! width="20%" align="right" |Current help desk > |}
| Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
|---|
| The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
Contents
January 27
[edit source]Request on 00:04:25, 27 January 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Giacomo44
[edit source]
The editor (NikolaiHo) who rejected an entry I submitted about an author has not replied to two detailed messages I have left on his "talk" page. His rejection was based on the "notable" criterion, which I dispute and can provide ample verifiable evidence to support a "notable" claim. If the editor does not reply in a timely manner, I want another editor or a third opinion. Giacomo44 (talk) 00:04, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Giacomo44 (talk) 00:04, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
- User:Giacomo44 - First, the draft was declined primarily for tone reasons rather than for notability reasons. I have reviewed the draft and I agree that it is written non-neutrally, apparently to praise its subject rather than to describe him neutrally. Second, however, as to notability, you have only provided one reference. It is usually a good idea to provide at least two references in order to establish general notability. Third, it appears that the editor who declined your draft edits irregularly. I also see that you expressed hostility toward the reviewer for their failure to respond to you. We are all volunteers, and expressing hostility toward another volunteer editor is not a useful way to get your draft approved. I would suggest that finding more references and changing the tone would be a more productive approach. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:37, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
17:14:30, 27 January 2017 review of submission by Terrybraunstein
[edit source]- Terrybraunstein (talk · contribs)
- No draft specified!
Terrybraunstein (talk) 17:14, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Terry_Braunstein_(artist)
Please remove the following from my page--it has been reviewed by a number of people, and it has been over a year since it was published. If it requires further review, would you please do so or tell me how this should be accomplished:
This page is a new unreviewed article. This template should be removed once the page has been reviewed by someone other than its creator; if necessary the page should be appropriately tagged for cleanup. (January 2016)
Thank you.
Terry Braunstein
- The page in question appears to be Terry Braunstein (artist). I see that the page has been tagged for a long time. However, please read the conflict of interest guideline. It isn't "your page"; it is a page about you. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:33, 28 January 2017 (UTC)