MyWiki:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2017 January 26

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by imported>Caroline Arruda at 17:12, 14 August 2017 (04:02:52, 26 January 2017 review of submission by Caroline Arruda). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This template must be substituted. Replace {{Archive header with {{subst:Archive header.

{| width = "100%"

|- ! colspan="3" align="center" | Help desk |- ! width="20%" align="left" | < January 25 ! width="25%" align="center"|<< Dec | January | Feb >> ! width="20%" align="right" |Current help desk > |}

Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


January 26

[edit source]

Request on 14:38:20, 26 January 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Beckcurran

[edit source]


Hello, the article was rejected as it did not meet the WP:PROF#Criteria but the subject of the article is not a professor or academic, she is an author and business woman and does meet the WP:BIO#Criteria. (as she has received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject.

I have removed some of the content from the article that could have made the reviewer say I needed WP:PROF criteria, is this acceptable now? Thanks for your help.

Beckcurran (talk) 14:38, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Hello, Beckcurran. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. I see that one of the reviewers has already responded to your question by placing a comment near the top of your draft. If we can be of any further help, please let us know. NewYorkActuary (talk) 04:05, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

14:48:01, 26 January 2017 review of submission by Giorgi gusharashvili

[edit source]

We are advertising agency from a small country and we have some notable achievements, we've submitted our Wiki article for review for the third time and it has been declined. We wanted to know how could we adjust the text to make it acceptable for Wikipedia policies. The reviewer deleted it because of "advertising purposes", but the thing is that the references that we have are valid and we don't know what much else to provide. Please help, sincerely, Leavingstone

Hello, Giorgi. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. I see that your question has already been answered by one of our reviewers, by placing a comment near the top of your draft. If we can be of any further assistance, please let us know. NewYorkActuary (talk) 04:07, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

20:31:45, 26 January 2017 review of submission by Donn Knox

[edit source]


Donn Knox (talk) 20:31, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

User:Donn Knox - Your submission is blank. Did you submit it by accident? Robert McClenon (talk) 03:06, 27 January 2017 (UTC)