imported>Pegship: archiving dec

2022-03-14T22:56:21Z

archiving dec

New page

{{archive}}

==Proposals, December 2021==

===Sri Lankan politician stubs===
{{sfp top|create}}
{{cl|Sri Lankan politician stubs}} is sitting at a 516 pages at the moment.

There are [[Provinces of Sri Lanka|9 provinces of Sri Lanka]]. Each MP represents an electoral district which corresponds exactly with the sub-[[Districts of Sri Lanka|districts of Sri Lanka]]. This makes for easy sorting even with historical stubs; thus, this would just be standard sorting by region: this would follow the set-up of {{cl|Sri Lanka geography stubs}}.

These would be created as:
#{{tl|CentralLK-politician-stub}} // {{cl|Central Province, Sri Lanka politician stubs}}
#{{tl|EasternLK-politician-stub}} // {{cl|Eastern Province, Sri Lanka politician stubs}}
#{{tl|NorthCentralLK-politician-stub}} // {{cl|North Central Province, Sri Lanka politician stubs}}
#{{tl|NorthWesternLK-politician-stub}} // {{cl|North Western Province, Sri Lanka politician stubs}}
#{{tl|NorthernLK-politician-stub}} // {{cl|Northern Province, Sri Lanka politician stubs}}
#{{tl|SabaragamuwaLK-politician-stub}} // {{cl|Sabaragamuwa Province politician stubs}}
#{{tl|SouthernLK-politician-stub}} // {{cl|Southern Province, Sri Lanka politician stubs}}
#{{tl|UvaLK-politician-stub}} // {{cl|Uva Province politician stubs}}
#{{tl|WesternLK-politician-stub}} // {{cl|Western Province, Sri Lanka politician stubs}}

It may also be beneficial to sort by party, but I'll determine this after initial sorting is complete.

[[User:Curbon7|Curbon7]] ([[User talk:Curbon7|talk]]) 07:06, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
*'''Support''' per nom. '''[[User:Pegship|Her Pegship]]''' ('''[[User talk:Pegship|?]]''') 03:16, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
{{sfp bottom}}

===Nepal politician stubs===
{{sfp top|create}}
{{cl|Nepalese politician stubs}} is sitting at a casual 513 pages at the moment.

There are [[Provinces of Nepal|7 provinces of Nepal]] as created in 2015. Even though these were created recently, they are organized by the grouping of the pre-existing sub-[[List of districts of Nepal|districts of Nepal]]. This makes for easy sorting even with historical stubs; thus, this would just be standard sorting by region: this would follow the set-up of {{cl|Nepal geography stubs}}.

These would be created as:
#{{tl|Bagmati-politician-stub}} // {{cl|Bagmati Province politician stubs}}
#{{tl|Gandaki-politician-stub}} // {{cl|Gandaki Province politician stubs}}
#{{tl|Karnali-politician-stub}} // {{cl|Karnali Province politician stubs}}
#{{tl|Lumbini-politician-stub}} // {{cl|Lumbini Province politician stubs}}
#{{tl|Province1NP-politician-stub}} // {{cl|Province No. 1 politician stubs}}
#{{tl|Province2NP-politician-stub}} // {{cl|Province No. 2 politician stubs}}
#{{tl|Sudurpashchim-politician-stub}} // {{cl|Sudurpashchim Province politician stubs}}

n.b. Province No. 1 and Province No. 2 will be renamed by the government eventually.

By region is pretty much the only way to sort Nepali politicians, as by party seems extremely difficult/impossible. This is because their political system has consisted of like 10-20 different major communist parties that are constantly merging and collapsing like every 2 seconds; this makes it a nigh impossible to figure out a sorting system that will last.

[[User:Curbon7|Curbon7]] ([[User talk:Curbon7|talk]]) 10:58, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
*'''Support''' per nom. '''[[User:Pegship|Her Pegship]]''' ('''[[User talk:Pegship|?]]''') 02:44, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
{{sfp bottom}}

===Taiwanese politician stubs===
{{sfp top|created}}
{{cl|Taiwanese politician stubs}} is huge, sitting at 485 articles. Propose splitting via the two major parties (i.e. {{tl|Taiwan-KMT-politician-stub}} for [[Kuomintang]] and {{tl|Taiwan-DPP-politician-stub}} for [[Democratic Progressive Party]]). Splitting via geography wouldn't work well since Taiwan is unitary, so by party seems better. Would sort first and make the categories after they reach 60 each. [[User:Curbon7|Curbon7]] ([[User talk:Curbon7|talk]]) 23:15, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
*'''Support''' per nom. '''[[User:Pegship|Her Pegship]]''' ('''[[User talk:Pegship|?]]''') 02:45, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
*Sorting completed. Was able to cut down to 248 pages. That's pretty much as good as it's gonna get, as most of the remainder have no party affiliation. Both categories were able to be created. [[User:Curbon7|Curbon7]] ([[User talk:Curbon7|talk]]) 06:38, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
{{sfp bottom}}

===Texas election stubs===
{{sfp top|created}}
{{tl|Texas-election-stub}} has [https://templatecount.toolforge.org/index.php?lang=en&namespace=10&name=Texas-election-stub#bottom 74 instances]. Would be created as {{cl|Texas election stubs}}. [[User:Curbon7|Curbon7]] ([[User talk:Curbon7|talk]]) 04:15, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
*'''Support''' per nom. '''[[User:Pegship|Her Pegship]]''' ('''[[User talk:Pegship|?]]''') 02:45, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
{{sfp bottom}}

===British Army stub===
{{sfp top|do not create}}
If there's consensus for the above template, can somebody [[Draft:Template:British-Army-stub|approve this draft?]] Thanks. --[[User:I dream of horses|I dream of horses]] [[Special:Contribs/I dream of horses|(Contribs)]] [[User talk:I dream of horses|(Talk)]] 03:05, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
:The parent category, {{cl|United Kingdom military stubs}}, is very poorly sorted and needs significant work; that said, I would '''support''' as an upmerge until it reaches the 60 article threshold (with the category likely being {{cl|British Army stubs}} once it crosses the threshold). [[User:Curbon7|Curbon7]] ([[User talk:Curbon7|talk]]) 03:28, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
::"Significant work" - really??? Care to explain your high provocative statement? [[Special:Contributions/78.32.143.113|78.32.143.113]] ([[User talk:78.32.143.113|talk]]) 04:33, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
:{{Comment}} As the creator of this draft stub, it is simply the case of creating a 'parity' of other arms [[British Armed Forces]] - the [[Royal Air Force]] has a 'root' stub, as does the [[Royal Navy]]. So why does the [[British Army]] not have a 'root' stub template? I would strongly suggest that many British Army-specific stub articles have been incorrectly classified with the WRONG stub template. My guess is that there would very easily be more that 60 articles which could be more accurately stubbed with {{tl|British Army stub}}. Kind regards. [[Special:Contributions/78.32.143.113|78.32.143.113]] ([[User talk:78.32.143.113|talk]]) 04:42, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
::If many British Army-related stub articles have been incorrectly classified, perhaps there is a question of whether they should be re-classified under an existing stub type (for example, {{cl|United Kingdom military unit and formation stubs}}, and/or {{cl|British Army personnel stubs}}). (I believe that is the work to which Curbon7 refers.) If there are fewer than 60 articles for which a new {{tl|British-Army-stub}} would be the best choice, we generally [[Wikipedia:Glossary#U|upmerge]] the template until more than 60 articles have been tagged with it, at which point it should have its own category. '''[[User:Pegship|Her Pegship]]''' ('''[[User talk:Pegship|?]]''') 04:35, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
{{sfp bottom}}

[[Category:WikiProject Stub sorting archives: Proposals 2021|12]]

MyWiki:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/Archive/2021/December - Revision history

imported>Pegship: archiving dec